Dr. Who

Plausible. It's still a mess. Sure didn't expect to be focusing on the Sabres this early in the year.

He seems to consistently come up small in pressure situations.

Dak takes a sack, let's the clock run down, then throws short of the end zone.

I've never been tempted to go to another team's message board. It just seems like an invitation for ill-will. You seem to think you're the victim of injustice. I don't know you. I recollect finding you insincere and annoying last year, but my memory is hazy on that. There's no way to verify whether you are indeed a golden gloves pugilist and veteran. What I can verify is how you interact with folks I know for years as posters here. Some of them are consistently insightful, and generally quite decent to others. The fact that you have come here for several years and provoked them is not evidence in your favor. And really, what is the meaning of these tough guy poses? That by itself hardly radiates maturity.

Happy birthday, fella!

The only time I see what that fella posts is when someone quotes him. He's only here to troll and say nasty things about anything the Bills do.

Easy enough to do. And just for the record, my scarf is only moderately tight.

So sweet to see the Chiefs lose. And sweeter still to a crap team. Not too often you'll see a team beat the Chiefs with just 114 yards passing... So if we lose next week do they still remain a “crap” team? The bolded was the original statement that I did not make that you responded to. Your statement appeared a non-sequitur to me, because it was not evident how whether the Bills win or lose next week had any relevance as to whether the Broncos were a "crap" team. That was what my actual comment was about. Your further responses confirm what a fine fellow you are indeed.

I'm responding to your response. I didn't make the original statement.

Why even ask that question? And Denver is generally considered not good, so what's your point? Are Bills' fans not allowed to be happy when the competition loses? Maybe you're not annoyed by all the Mahomes commercials or the favorable calls that seem to help them out late in the game, but plenty of folks are.

The bad teams winning this week means fewer sellers. Still think Beane will try to make a small move to bolster the D.

Understood. I initially reacted to the same thing.

Fella, it's a joke. Someone upthread declared them unstoppable after the first touchdown. I responded by declaring it a bit premature for those sorts of announcements, with the further assertion that they were currently stoppable because SF had answered. The whole enterprise is dubious . . .

Never met a donut he didn't love. Bengals pretty close to going back to unstoppable, btw.

We only want the ones who can't play.

And now it's tied. Maybe let's wait a bit before making pronouncements. Or do we continue based on every momentary permutation. It could get tedious. Currently, they may be stoppable.

He took a lot of bad sacks in the first half. Falcons have had a spark once Heinicke came in.

So, the hapless Falcons are not only losing to the Titans, they have allowed 3 reception tds by Hopkins.

And one of them is named Gabe Davis.

I hope we start seeing Kincaid become the de facto second option. It would be nice if Hopkins shook loose at the TDL and that Beane was in on it. I'm rooting for a Falcons' win to nudge the Titans into being a seller. (Overall, I'm pleased with Gabe Davis this year. He's done better than I expected. If he was WR3, I'd be happier.)

Or you could fix the spelling in the title, like a rational human being.

How you doing Camilla? Give Charles my regards.

Henry would be nice, but expensive. He's a bit of a luxury, though I'd love to have him. I think they should prioritize 1DT and LB. Don't know what is out there.

That's good life advice. And trying to be in control resulted in overly cautious, conservative choices.

I was never happy with the Elam pick, but now, of course, no one is.