Fan in Chicago

On such things, I trust Leroi and Foster isn't on the bills top-5 list according to him

Thanx, Blokes

Does this make him a 'system quarterback' ? I worry about what happens if the Bills change coaches as it limits either his future or the freedom to choose future coaches. Also, does he look like a kid who has demonstrated a good work ethic ?

Threads regarding prospects have a lot of utility value (1) it allows for (hopefully) respectful debate among college football fans who may follow a few teams more closely than others (2) (more importantly) it educates non-college football watchers such as me regarding the top prospects. Belive it or not, I learn a lot more when I read posts from you, Blokes, DaveM etc so do keep it going and (3) its bloody good entertainment to the dispassionate observer None of this deserves some of the hand wringing seen here often.

Jerry Sullivan still writing in 2030 ? That sure is one heck of a nightmare

And that really makes sense. While I agree that we have to keep swinging to get a hit, there is still the question of how much to over-value the QB position. With all the evaluations, I really don't see any consensus picks in the top-10

Earlier in this thread, Leroi had promised to report the Bills' final 5 for the #10 spot. This was that list. Interesting that there is no QB on that list. All those QBs they are looking at must be for the 2nd Rd pick or a tradeback into Rd 1

Your premise itself starts this discussion off on the wrong foot. Not many share this point of view. The Bills are finally giving enough importance to the QB position to not be happy with that they have. They are taking a deeper look at a few and will pick one if the value is there. As Cardale has not played enough, we have no idea which trajectory he will follow. More options are better.

I am going to go on a limb and say that this does not change the Bills draft strategy. If they land the QB they like at the pick position they want, they will take him. Then Jones and Yates can fight out for the 2nd/3rd spot.

I can argue that said hungry kid may not be near as talented. Sherman in an immediate impact player who changes the nature of our currently woeful secondary. We all know how important QB pressure and secondary coverage is, in a conference with Brady. I am setting emotions aside when I say that this will be a good trade if it costs us a second or a player-for-player deal.

I watched the video before my posts today. He answered that question. You claim he didn't because it won't fit your narrative.

What on earth are you jabbering about ? Which questions did Pegula not answer?? And I find your statement quite ironic when you have not answered oldman's simple question. Twice

That is a fair point and well argued. I don't think the Bills should attempt to revolutionize anything. For much of the past decade and especially these past few years, the Bills have left themselves with little margin for error. They should make safe picks esp with the top 2-3 picks and not go for boom-or-bust and 'project' prospects.

Are you claiming to know the selection process of all Superbowl winning teams ? I sure have no clue about any other team's internal workings. All I know is that there are few organizations which are consistently successful due to one person making all strategic, marketing and execution decisions. Most major decisions are made with collaboration, though it still needs a leader to guide the process and make sure it is a balanced decision. I dont know if you are claiming otherwise.

Personally, I prefer that no one person has absolute authority. Whaley will scout but McD has to decide which players fit in his schemes the best. Do you prefer this or a person on an ego-trip like Donahoe selecting McGahee or 'run to the podium' choice CJ Spiller ?

This makes the most sense and something that several in here had said might be happening. But of course it is way too boring to the LaCanforas and Sully's of the media world and the Whaley detractors on this board. Leaks seem to be plugged, they are all in on the 'one voice' philosophy and have hired an image consultant. If there is to be one voice, better McD than Whaley.

I feel like sniping at you but really dont know where to start. So just for simplicity - what did you want to say in this post ? McD should have won games without ever having been a HC ? That he should emote like Jack Nicholson to be truly called a good coach ? Nobody expects anybody to be 'sold' on a rookie HC till at least the second year.

Good post, oldman.

Please define "anyone"

I have been told that my humor is only exceeded by my football knowledge.

Probably doesn't want to pay for the extra long phone line for the modem

You are being kind. More like 5+ years

Please tell me you are being sarcastic Yep. That interview just confirmed what several of us believed for a while - that RR is a lazy, egotistic bum who is entirely incompetent to be an NFL head coach

I dont think so, Hapless. I still think the Bills will draft a QB with one of their first 2 picks and go WR with the other (then D the rest of the way). They kept a known devil in TT being fully aware of his limitations. No other QB out there would have provided this to the Bills at this time. Once the rookie or CJ is ready, they will play if better than TT. The Bills avoided a desperation pick like EJ was. This gives them the luxury to get the value guy at their pick.

Let me help re-structure your question. While the thought of trading McCoy sounds outlandish, the concept of a player-for-player trade or a Player+pick = Sherman may not be a bad discussion to have. What would the Bills give up to bring an aggressive DB into the fold ? Against Brady (with Cooks) on the other side, an strong secondary would be a good strategy. What other chips are we willing to use to sweeten the pot ? Wood ? Clay ? In any case, this discussion should be merged in the larger Sherman thread.