Jump to content

SectionC3

Community Member
  • Posts

    7,494
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by SectionC3

  1. Their brains are also programmed to spell correctly. So there’s that.
  2. Hoax. You don't even know what you want to ban. Maybe if you stopped worrying about Bert and Ernie potentially getting it on and stopped obsessing over kids showing you their junk before they compete in high school sports you could come up with a list of books that you believe should be burned to protect children from people who want to see their junk before they play high school tennis or high school golf. Weird and sick, I know, but that's where MAGA Republicans are these days. This is an odd post. On the one hand, you support junk checks before kids play sports. On the other hand, you're worried about innuendo regarding a fictional frog and a fictional toad. You are one conflicted guy, that's for sure.
  3. You lost me at Yeldon could still play.
  4. Not happening.
  5. Nothing specific I’m going to share here, that’s for sure. But rest assured, he is a scumbag.
  6. Agree to disagree.
  7. No, it’s not. In any event, I believe I called him a scumbag. He’s earned it.
  8. Bad, by any objective measure. I’ll say no more.
  9. You have this all wrong. Don’t assume this is about business.
  10. Here they really should be looking for a guy with one solid, unquestionable trait. This guy’s is his size. So we’ll see what happens. I
  11. This. Take a flier on voorhees with the bonus pick we picked up if he’s still there. Perfect time to take a swing or to bank or for next year.
  12. I agree. How many of the guys drafted today will make our team? Maybe two? Nothing is a reach right now. It’s all a crapshoot. And the perfect time to take a shot on someone who has an unusual talent or trait.
  13. This is kind of where I'm at (although you put it much more intelligently). Bernard is a fast guy who plays exceedingly slow. This guy doesn't have Bernard's track speed, but I think he plays a fair bit faster and certainly more violently. I think they're going to try to beef him up a bit and eventually put him in the middle. Whether he starts in September is a questionable thing, but the reality is that our LBs both missed some time over the past couple of years and tend to get beat up. So unless we beef up at 3T, and even if we were to beef up at 3T, this guy probably is going to see the field one way or another this year.
  14. My distaste for him has nothing to do with his professional capacity. He is a scumbag. I'll leave it at that.
  15. Spector cost us Hodgins, too. Keeping Spector, at least. I’m with you on our evaluation of LBs. Does Bernard even get a second year at this point? He better have a good camp.
  16. No it’s not. Trust me.
  17. He’s a scumbag. That’s what’s wrong with him.
  18. CB actually makes a lot of sense to me of the value is there and if they believe the CB is better than Benford/available safeties. Tre probably is in his last year. Rookie corner plays next year; Benford slides over to safety, and away we go. Not a bad way to remake the secondary on the fly. I’m with you on WR. I think they’re looking boundary now after the Kincaid pick.
  19. I suppose I see a little Kelce in his running style. I initially wasn't sure about the pick. But (now that a whopping ten minutes has passed), I've settled on the idea that this regime has earned the benefit of the doubt.
  20. We did bring in OJ Howard last year with an eye on using more two TE sets. So they've been thinking about this for awhile.
  21. WR to giants here? Trade up smells of blocking us.
  22. Depends on the terms of the trade, and who’s on the board.
  23. Hopefully they get tempted by Levis.
×
×
  • Create New...