SectionC3

Seriously. Usually that guy just writes a bunch of marginally comprehensible gibberish. His most recent post is more deluded and desperate than normal. These people are all tied up in knots - accusing each other of sharing child porn, worried about junk checks for children. It’s sick. Where’s Chris Farley when you need him? Hopefully not in that van by the river. Now his pal Bills Fan NC is sharing more of what Mr. Chris Farley previously characterized as child porn. Our lonely eyes tun to you, Mr. Chris Farley, for comment on this turn of events.

It is not for every sport. But if you want to have a junk check before a child plays a sport like bowling, or golf, or tennis, or swimming, or track, that’s on you. And, you’ve overlooked the point that the physical is not conducted immediately before competition. Between the time of the physical and the time of the competition something with respect to the examinee’s condition could change. So your junk check position really is that you think that junk should be examined before each competition. Sick. Very sick.

This is nonsensical. Even for you. That’s saying something.

Interesting. MAGA begins to unwittingly turn on itself. Chris Farley has accused that other guy of sharing child porn. Outstanding. Let’s see MAGA wiggle out of this one.

What I say is that you’re into some pretty lurid stuff. I also say that I’m still waiting for a response to the point that you’re pro-junk check before kids play high school sports. Sick. But that’s MAGA for you.

Their brains are also programmed to spell correctly. So there’s that.

Hoax. You don't even know what you want to ban. Maybe if you stopped worrying about Bert and Ernie potentially getting it on and stopped obsessing over kids showing you their junk before they compete in high school sports you could come up with a list of books that you believe should be burned to protect children from people who want to see their junk before they play high school tennis or high school golf. Weird and sick, I know, but that's where MAGA Republicans are these days. This is an odd post. On the one hand, you support junk checks before kids play sports. On the other hand, you're worried about innuendo regarding a fictional frog and a fictional toad. You are one conflicted guy, that's for sure.

You lost me at Yeldon could still play.

Not happening.

Nothing specific I’m going to share here, that’s for sure. But rest assured, he is a scumbag.

Hyperbolic.

Agree to disagree.

No, it’s not. In any event, I believe I called him a scumbag. He’s earned it.

Bad, by any objective measure. I’ll say no more.

You have this all wrong. Don’t assume this is about business.

Here they really should be looking for a guy with one solid, unquestionable trait. This guy’s is his size. So we’ll see what happens. I

This. Take a flier on voorhees with the bonus pick we picked up if he’s still there. Perfect time to take a swing or to bank or for next year.

I agree. How many of the guys drafted today will make our team? Maybe two? Nothing is a reach right now. It’s all a crapshoot. And the perfect time to take a shot on someone who has an unusual talent or trait.

Nope

This is kind of where I'm at (although you put it much more intelligently). Bernard is a fast guy who plays exceedingly slow. This guy doesn't have Bernard's track speed, but I think he plays a fair bit faster and certainly more violently. I think they're going to try to beef him up a bit and eventually put him in the middle. Whether he starts in September is a questionable thing, but the reality is that our LBs both missed some time over the past couple of years and tend to get beat up. So unless we beef up at 3T, and even if we were to beef up at 3T, this guy probably is going to see the field one way or another this year.

My distaste for him has nothing to do with his professional capacity. He is a scumbag. I'll leave it at that.

Spector cost us Hodgins, too. Keeping Spector, at least. I’m with you on our evaluation of LBs. Does Bernard even get a second year at this point? He better have a good camp.

No it’s not. Trust me.

He’s a scumbag. That’s what’s wrong with him.

CB actually makes a lot of sense to me of the value is there and if they believe the CB is better than Benford/available safeties. Tre probably is in his last year. Rookie corner plays next year; Benford slides over to safety, and away we go. Not a bad way to remake the secondary on the fly. I’m with you on WR. I think they’re looking boundary now after the Kincaid pick.