Jump to content

SectionC3

Community Member
  • Posts

    7,501
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by SectionC3

  1. CB actually makes a lot of sense to me of the value is there and if they believe the CB is better than Benford/available safeties. Tre probably is in his last year. Rookie corner plays next year; Benford slides over to safety, and away we go. Not a bad way to remake the secondary on the fly. I’m with you on WR. I think they’re looking boundary now after the Kincaid pick.
  2. I suppose I see a little Kelce in his running style. I initially wasn't sure about the pick. But (now that a whopping ten minutes has passed), I've settled on the idea that this regime has earned the benefit of the doubt.
  3. We did bring in OJ Howard last year with an eye on using more two TE sets. So they've been thinking about this for awhile.
  4. WR to giants here? Trade up smells of blocking us.
  5. Depends on the terms of the trade, and who’s on the board.
  6. Hopefully they get tempted by Levis.
  7. I figured. Lots of meetings and McD is tight w Narduzzi, right?.
  8. The guess here is that you’re talking about Addison.
  9. Happy to enlighten you. You misspelled forward. It’s a fairly simple thing. To me, at least. And, if we weaken public schools through efforts such as those in South Carolina, we risk diluting the bedrock of our educational system. Which, of course, leaves us with a bunch of people who can’t properly spell “forward.” Is your grammar (or, largely, anyone’s grammar) a big issue? Of course not. But if we can’t get the small things right, we can’t get the big things right. That does not bode well for the future of our country.
  10. Thanks for contributing a couple of bucks to social welfare programs. I think it’s a way to get in good with St. Peter when you inevitably run into him at the pearly gates. Hopefully now you have some more time to get to work on your anger issues! Your post illustrates why this is a bad idea.
  11. Who said anything about poor curb appeal? Sounds like there’s a little projecting there! But it’s probably true. I’m retired from the scene, but from what I hear women don’t care to date angry dudes who wear red hats and think the world owes them a favor because they didn’t do well in school and now have to do such things as clean my car and collect my trash.
  12. I haven't been. I don't think I'd fit in. I have all of my teeth, I have a job, and I'm not morbidly obese. I also don't blame everyone else for all of my self-inflicted problems (diabetes, stupidity, poor credit, obesity, bullet holes in the side of my double-wide, etc.), so a MAGA rally is not the place for me.
  13. They should take a field trip to a MAGA rally. Much more effective.
  14. Hoax. I asked for titles plural. All you have is one. So, sadly, it appears that you don’t even know what you want burned, aside from that single title.
  15. Hoax. I asked for titles. I got one. So either there’s only one lurid book causing all of this fuss, or you book burners don’t have a clue what you’re taking about. Or maybe it’s both. Whatever. Bottom line is you don’t even know what you want banned.
  16. So that’s the only item of “porn” that concerns you? Got it. I was worried that you want stuff banned because someone on NewsMax had the idea and that you don’t actually have a clue what it is that you want banned. I guess that no longer is a concern!
  17. Which pornographic material is in question? Perhaps you could identify some of these “pornographic” titles so that the veracity of your claim can be assessed. Otherwise, this is just another hoax.
  18. You gotta lay off the Bud Light. This is incomprehensible.
  19. Your attempt at wit is charming and clever. Hoax. Be better.
  20. In point of fact nobody's burning down cities. Looks like all of MAGA's hand-wringing about Antifa and the Antifa Air Force was nothing but a hoax.
  21. Sort of like all of those guys who want to shut down Mickey Mouse for not being sufficiently judgmental. Sad. I don't agree with her politics, but the fact is that she's doing something consequential with her life and you're talking about what it is that she's doing. So there's that.
  22. Is this what MAGA calls gaslighting? You and I are both concerned about our education system. I'm worried that continued dilution of our educational standards and processes will result in the licensing of physicians who believe in hoaxes such as the utility of HCQ and Ivermectin in combating COVID. If memory serves, and heaven knows I don't have the best memory, you are a physician who believed (and, perhaps, believes) in the utility of those COVID-inefficacious drugs. Rather than contest that point, you--and forgive me, maybe I have this wrong--appear to be gaslighting by referring to a different issue that nobody else has raised. Sad.
  23. Nah. They amuse me. They (and now, apparently you) are the joke.
  24. So you're saying you're the equivalent of a commie and a socialist, but just without the pyrotechnics. Well done.
  25. Solid point. If this keeps up, then soon enough we'll be cranking out physicians who believe that HCQ and Ivermectin are effective treatments for COVID.
×
×
  • Create New...