ndirish1978

Wait guys, what if she was asking for it?!

Uhh, he is a monster receiver. Don't sleep on him just cause he was on our team that sucked last year with a QB who can't pass gas. He will be an excellent TE as a pro, he catches EVERYTHING. I would be ecstatic if we took him- I think he's better than Keller as far as being polished player and we can get him a rd later; that leaves us free to go CB/WR in rds 1-2 and we get our 3 major needs filled immediately.

I don't like Kelsay, that's a given, but would someone please explain to me how it is the FO is going to sign a man to a 4 yr $24m contract and then draft a replacement for him with their first rd pick? They are going to eat this one and give him another year to pan out.

If Youboty is so sold, please explain how Greer, who was NOT a relatively high draft pick, was able to pass him on the depth chart. How Kilwaukee Thomas, who was cut, was before him? Just because you saw a game once and Youboty made a tackle does not win your argument.

You have cornered the market on ridiculous posts. This is by far the worst idea I have heard on here for a while. DON'T pick because you want to find a trading partner...only they will still be on the hook for a #1 salary and you will get less in return? Yeah, that makes sense.

PLEASE SWEED

CompensaTORY picks can't be, but he is talking about compensaTOEY, completely different!

My main issues, though I think the program is great, are with the lockouts and grab decisions FWIW

Someone needs to stop spiking Al Davis' Metamucil

It doesn't mention that Jauron imed him a smiley face thumbs up at 12:03!

A couple of notes Astro: QB- I would switch this to P6 for us CB- Switch to P2 Also, I would remove the lockouts on DeSean Jackson, Early Doucet if we get a tall WR and remove it from Andre Caldwell altogether I have NO IDEA why you have McFadden as a grab for us, we have Lynch. I would remove that as well Just my opinion

I agree that signing James drops out need for a cb, but just slightly

I guarantee: at least 1 win at least 1 loss everything else is out of my hands

Kelsay is entrenched at his position. Jauron has given him a "leadership position" locker in the center of the locker room and obviously thinks he is starting material, we will not go DE in rd 1

per kffl Bills | Hamdan Set to Shock the World Wed, 19 Mar 2008 09:15:36 -0700 Chris Brown, of buffalobills.com, reports Gibran Hamdan is ready to take real strides this season. Brown reports the team is considering starting "Chroise" as dubbed by fans on a popular website, to starting QB, relegating the highly touted Trent Edwards to a backup role. Coach Dick Jauron cites Hamdan's irresistable charm and natural olive complexion as the main reason for this decision, noting that as a football move, the switch makes no sense.

If they take an OL I will cry

I like exactly 1 of your picks. Other than that, I admire your typing skills.

His mother is godmother to someone's kid, making that kid Marshawn's godbrother. It's mainly a Catholic thing: "If I die, X will take care of my kids."

Wikipedia is REALLY fast http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Will_Peterson

When you think about it, there are essentially only 5 different threads on here that recycle under different names anyway: 1- Why do we suck (assigning blame to the FO and HC)? 2- When are we gonna be good again? 3- I like to play GM, let's sign (ridiculous trade idea or FA signing) 4- A saw a famous person today (that makes me cool by association). 5- How long til our misery as fans is exceeded only by our misery as ex-fans when the team moves to Toronto. I have saved you $200 and recovered 90% of all posts with this response. You are all welcome.

McGee and Greer are the best tandem at what exactly? Cause it's not at playing football.

I think people would be willing to kick in if you do decide to go for the data recovery. I myself have no opinion either way. I do want to say thanks for everything you do and have done to make this place what it is. Thanks.

What if McFadden is there and we trade our 1 and 4 for their 2 1s? Would that work out according to the value chart?

I would request that you heed your own advice. Get out

I do agree with the post about forcing us to take a WR...to a point. I don't really think the FO will hesitate to take a CB in the 1st and grab our 2WR in the 2nd or 3rd if it really came down to it. What I DID like about the Bryant Johnson move is they obviously didn't cave and give tons of money to an untested player. As far as reaches go in the draft, I think the term is stupid. No players go in to the draft with a guaranteed pro effectiveness rating, we basically valuate them like art, they are worth what people are willing to pay them. Mandarich and Leaf were not "reaches" when they were taken, but because they were overvalued and didn't produce we feel the need to justify the pre-draft ranking system and call them "busts." Using the criteria everyone espouses as far as how far down you could move and still get a player, Tom Brady would have been a HUGE reach even as a 4th rd pick, when obviously his value turned out to be greater than any other players. Bottom line, take who you want on your team when it's your turn.