Ed_Formerly_of_Roch

Yeah but Rex and Schwartz aren't on the actual field, so they can fired up, and try to fire up other,s but they can't actually do anything directly wrong. They can't fumble or miss a tackle casue they are trying to level the guy so hard instead of wrapping him up. ! Well actually Rex can get in the way of the play from the sideline!!

Usually these types of things, being extra amped for a game blow up in your face. This worries me!

I don't think Brady ever hits the wall because I don't think he'll allow it. He strikes me as the kind of guy who will leave before he gets to that point. While I'm sure he loves playing football I don't sense the same love and devotion to it as you see in Manning. Manning has been often mentioned of taking a front office job once he retires, again don't see Brady doing that as he'd rather spend his time doing other things. And last but not least, he probably senses that if he doesn't leave when still great, Belichick would have no problem cutting him if his skills drop. So after seeing years of that in NE, I think he leaves on his terms.

If it's the winner of Bills Jets is in and loser goes home, good chance, but looking at all the games, I still think Vikes Packers is a better chance of going to Sunday night unless division is already decided prior. And yes you are half way correct, Giants Pats was a night game, but a Saturday night game

LOL this comes up every year. There is no scheduled Sunday night game, but there IS a Sunday night game. Based on playoff races they will likely announce it around 7:00 Dec 27th. If the Bills Jets game means a playoff date for one of them, good chance that might be the one particularly when you factor in the NYC TV impact. Looking at the schedule for that week, likely will either be Jet's Bills if game has meaning, or more likely one of the NFC east games as Giants are playing Eagles and Cowgirls and Skins. Most likely choice might be Packers Vikings game.

Lewis is really lucky he works for a very cheap owner who doesn't want to have to eat the contract. Seems everytime Marvin is on thin ice, has a couple of losing seasons, on top of prior losing seasons, but still has 1 or 2 years left on deal. With is history of losing, would be more than enough to be fired by most owners, but Browns cheapness prevails, keeps him for one more year so as not to have to eat much or any of contract, then Lewis has a strong season, gets rewarded with a new contract, and we repeat the cycle all over again. Everytime Lewis is at the end of the deal he puts together a winning season and gives reason for hope.

The problem is simple, the coaching staff just isn't nearly as smart as you are about these things.

Will be interesting to see what happens in the draft. If the Bill's use a 3rd or 4th rounder and select one of hte top kickers, that would say the writing is one the wall. Other than drafting someone, doubt there are any better options out there.

When I saw it live the first time, my thought was I can't believe he didn't step out, so wasn't surprised when it was brought back. Likely would have been too close to win on a review.

Why can't it be both ways? The NFC east sucks and so do we. As bad as they are, we're even worse or as bad so likely will lose at least some. Our records are about the same, granted we all have a very inflated value of the Bill's abilities, but our records are similar so the likelihood of winning all three with two on the road, based on simple odds is not very good. Further our chances of making the playoffs are fading regardless of what the outcomes is as other teams won today like the Jets and KC. If Pitt wins tonight (now 21-10) that will be another nail in the coffin. Last but certainly not least, why would it even matter what is said. Kind of funny as you and many others here always rip those in the media calling them ball washers when they write bad things about the Bill's. Did you ever think that you and others like are nothing but Bill's ball washers?

They showed a stat today, he has the 5th most receptions for TE's in the AFC. That puts him in the top 40%

Bills are winning the penalty yards battle, that's a unique thing!!

1970 was actually post merger. So it wasn't the result of Miami operating in the Wild Wild West AFL-NFL wars, they just took one out of the Patriots playbook and thought no one would notice!

Think it made sense for Bon Jovi to want to move the Bills to a larger market like Toronto, but already being in Nashville, doubt he'd want to go to Toronto. I'd imagine he'll just line up someone with deep pockets with ties to Nashville, or someone who could care less where the team is located, and would keep them there. I'd think the league would rather have a team in Nashville than Toronto, but some would also have preferred Toronto to Buffalo. If the league is trying to move two teams to LA how would this help by bringing Toronto into the mix other than maybe use it as leverage to get a better deal from LA??

Did they actually trade two picks or were the Colts awarded the pick afterwards as a result of "tampering" I thought he went to Miami pre AFL-NFL merger and things were running pretty loose with regards to contracts. Things were starting to settle down with respect to contracts, but Miami signed him without an agreement, eventually the NFL ruled and awarded the picks?? Not certain, but thought it was not an agreed upon trade, but it's been a few years.

Agree, some good info. The other side of it too if you do get a Brady, Manning, Rodgers, etc once his rookie contract expires and you have to pay him the the going rate for a franchise QB, it's hard to afford to pay for enough talent to keep around him. If you're a Brady or a Rodgers, your talent can make up for some of that, but if you're Russell Wilson, not so sure. Will be interesting to see where Seattle goes the next couple of years now that they are paying RW all this $$. Will the team stay good, IMO I think they will quickly drop back to a .500 team. So yes that's true, my first question is what did these other QB's do after their first three games, did they also drop off. At this point there is enough film on him to know his strengths and weaknesses and game plan against him. The question is will he also improve? Likely for the remainder of this year, I'll give the edge to defenses. Next year will see what happens. But I do think even without any improvement if you put a strong team around him, which without paying him $20mil you can afford to do, I do think you can be highly competitive and win with him. And to your question of why did Ozzie let him go, what would you have suggested they do? Franchise him for what $15 mil to sit on the bench? Almost every QB out there in a similar situation leaves. Can you give me some names of QB's who at the end of their first signed rookie contract, playing on a team with an established starter at QB, have started say less than a handful of games with their current team, signed a new contract with that same team? Actually there may be some only because they did play a couple of games and maybe they totally sucked, so they didn't get any other offers but if that were the case would also be surprised if the team wanted to re-sign him. Can you explain what you thought Ozzie should have done and why TT would have likely agreed to it?

I'd disagree with #1 as other than the NE the deep ball has been one of his best plays. Maybe that was the strategy Andy Reid tried in the first half and Sammy racked up over 150 yards

Wrong!! Not the college trading deadline. That goes up to spring signing day.

I don't recall the Bills interviewing Hue Jackson??

Not a huge, huge SU football fan , tough to root much for a team that wins 3 or 4 games a year when you're out of the area and you have a 10-1 team down the road, so for all I know they've already hired someone, but wouldn't surprise me to see Etzell at SU

Everything I've read over the years is the refs don't want full time jobs as they all have long term professional careers making big money. If they made them full time supposedly many would quit. The issue I have is the NFL for years cultivated that type of person as the thought was someone making $300 to $500k couldn't be bribed. The problem is in todays would, with as much money being bet, someone could afford $1/2 mil payoff to bribe an official for one game. The other issue I have is in todays world, they guy making those kind of salary's no longer has a 9 to 5 job like Ward Cleaver did, he's at work from 7 till 7 and brings home work on the weekends, so doesn't have enough time to devote to reffing. I'm in favor of full time officials, to get around the problem of too many existing ones quitting because of not wanting to give up careers, I'd phase it in, each year maybe add 2 fulltime positions to crew, so after five years or so, they'd all be full time.

Yeah but the funny part is it seems like Carpenter misses less from long distance. It's the short "extra points" that are killing him.

He also didn't do very well as a HC. Just like Rex, they both were good coordinators who as HC have struggled.

Are you saying it's correct because you've read the rule book or because someone who likely knows about as much as the announcers told them it was correct per the rules. I'll wait until around mid week when the NFL issues there weekly "mistakes report" until we know it truly was the correct call. Everything I've always read the refs don't want to be full time as most don't want to give up their full time jobs. That's the argument the league has made as to why they aren't full time now, if they did that too many of their experienced officials would quit. I'm in favor of full time officials BTW, but this is the argument I've often heard against it. As was pointed out last week the guy who was the official for the Bill's Monday night game Gene Salitare or something like that, was on TV the week prior officiating an NCAA college basketballl game.

If there are dozens as you claim, then explain why there are at least a third of the teams that just never win. Year in and year out they lose, why because they too don't have a good GM. I've said for years the most important hire a team can have is the GM, more than the coach, players, etc. I could give a number of examples of teams that went from years of losing to becoming winners once they got a good GM. Yes Whaley has been here 6 years, but not as GM. The roster does have the most talent it's had in years. Is it turning itn oa playoff team, so far no, but they are better now than when he arrived.