
L Ron Burgundy
Community Member-
Posts
2,792 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Gallery
Profiles
Forums
Events
Everything posted by L Ron Burgundy
-
2024 Election Polls - President - Senate - House
L Ron Burgundy replied to Big Blitz's topic in Politics, Polls, and Pundits
Agreed. The people paid to analyze polls who have been doing it for years I trust but....not a whole heckuva lot this time around. -
2024 Election Polls - President - Senate - House
L Ron Burgundy replied to Big Blitz's topic in Politics, Polls, and Pundits
Prove it. Can you prove anything you believe? Who has the criminal record? Who has been successfully sued more? Provably ran a fake school. Provably ripped off a charity. You a joke son. A complete joke. That's who you're in love with. A complete scumbag. Congrats. Like I said 100x around here. In the future many of you will not admit to being Trump supporters. Many will be too embarrassed, the rest will still be too stupid to be embarrassed. -
2024 Election Polls - President - Senate - House
L Ron Burgundy replied to Big Blitz's topic in Politics, Polls, and Pundits
Says the guy voting for a rapist! You can't make this stuff up. You are irredeemable. Either you're too dumb to fathom for believing a known liar about everything or a disgusting human for voting in moronic, pathological liar, rapist. There is no in between. What's your opinion? Do you believe this latest swing towards blue in very recent polling? Things seem to suddenly be looking good for dems. Do you trust it? -
Yeah, I've seen your posts about it. Each and every single one debunked. You're batting .0000. Meanwhile the other guy had fake electors that tried to pretend trump won. You seem ok with that blatant cheating. Odd. Maybe Kamala should do what Trump did this time around. I wonder if you'll be alright if she does it. Something tells me that's a no. Something tells me your whole cheating thing is just about you losing and that you don't really want free and fair elections.
-
Find any yet? Your proof for this is as reliable as proof for big foot.
-
Was it Lankford? The republican largely responsible for writing it? Every post! You're so dumb you think you're winning when you're down 70-0! If we were boxing you'd be claiming victory when I knocked you out 6 months ago. How do you exist day-to-day? Do you....live with your mom?
-
Every post. Weaker, dumber, and now it's clear your sense of humor has as much quality as your current events knowledge. You a chump son. Ya got nothin.
-
Durrrrrr. Good one. Did you actually think this was funny? You said to yourself, "this will be great!", before posting this? Ooof you are one sad human being. You don't comprehend any current events you comment on. A failed troll. And you have the sense of humor of telephone pole.
-
They got the elusive BillsfanNC on video again in his native habitat!
-
I thought dems were going to lose for a while. The polls looked bad. But the people that study polls for a living are saying Kamala is going to pull out the win. We just need to make sure there are no illegal shenanigans. And for sure, they are considering several ways to cheat. Crap like this: https://newrepublic.com/article/187780/trump-little-secret-mike-johnson
-
YES. I've wanted a gigantic 1T forever. A Ted Washington type (i know he wasn't 1 tech but I want a giant like him). This 100%. Most feel that way even though he's hurt already? I dunno if this is accurate.
-
How many posts on this? About an snl skit? They said they wouldn't and then they did! You apparently hold SNL to a much higher standard than the guy you want to elect as our president. Weird. Very weird. Explain the strong emotion this has elicited because we don't get it. At all. Normally I can at least see the magat POV (admittedly it's mostly just crying about cheating/life's unfair bs/absolving a pathological liar) this time i got nothin.
-
Nobody cares except you and and a guy who clearly needs a psychiatrist. Maybe they couldn't make schedules work but later could??? They thought it'd be a ratings boost? Maybe they just don't want a rapist to be their president, is that a horrid thought to you? They are in NY, the state that knows him best and hates him most. I cannot believe you're crying about an snl skit. Next thing you know the right will be crying that white people are being oppressed. Oh wait....
-
The decision to go for the FG - right or wrong?
L Ron Burgundy replied to Matt_In_NH's topic in The Stadium Wall
Right decision. Bass has a big leg, struggles notwithstanding. All in all that game was too close. Our D didn't look great at times. -
LOL, please tell me you're BSing when you say you're a teacher? A constitutional republic is a form of democracy you imbecile I'd hoped you'd learned this from the last time you spewed your ignorance. This is why maga is hated. You vomit incorrect talking points because you know nothing about anything. Find me one reliable source that agrees with you. When you eat up these idiot talking points and then spew them elsewhere maybe you should think for just a moment if your source is BS. Here's a little education for the "teacher" from AI. I can also cite scholars and academics though not many answer such a low brow question because it is so utterly devoid of sense and understanding. Is a constitutional republic a form of democracy? Yes, a constitutional republic is a form of democracy, but it operates with specific structures to protect individual rights and limit government power. Here’s how it works: Democratic Foundations: In a constitutional republic, officials are elected by the people, similar to a democracy. These elected representatives make decisions on behalf of the public, embodying the principle of representative democracy. This system ensures that citizens have a voice through voting, an essential feature of democratic governance. Constitutional Limits and Rule of Law: What makes a constitutional republic unique is that it’s bound by a constitution, a guiding document that defines the powers and limits of government. The constitution protects individual rights (like free speech, due process, and equality) and ensures that laws apply equally to everyone. This system limits the potential for "majority rule" to infringe on the rights of minorities, a risk in pure democracy. Checks and Balances: In a constitutional republic like the United States, a separation of powers among executive, legislative, and judicial branches prevents any one branch from becoming too powerful. These checks and balances are designed to safeguard democratic principles while protecting individual freedoms. So, while a constitutional republic has democratic elements through elections and representative government, it differs from direct or "pure" democracy by emphasizing constitutional limits and the rule of law to safeguard rights and maintain a balance of power.
-
Dumb, irrelevant comparison. If you say certain types can't be proven without voter id, ok, that makes sense. But you knuckle-dragging imbeciles have claimed fraud time and again with examples that have nothing to do with voter id. Dead people voting require voter ID? Counting votes multiple times? There are hundreds of ways to cheat that aren't impacted by voter id. The guy who doesn't even comprehend that a constitutional republic is a form of democracy shouldn't call ANYONE stupid. Unless he speaks of himself then it makes perfect sense. Don't protest too much, that would mean he still has 3 on you.
-
Week 9, Fish v. Bills, PREDICT THE SCORE!
L Ron Burgundy replied to Freddie's Dead's topic in The Stadium Wall
30 - 21 Bills It's not as close as the score indicates. Miami goes down the field easily on their first 2 drives but then our Def adjusts and shuts down their offense. Josh has his typical fins performance. -
You can't prove fraud unless you have voter id? Why? If true then why have your people posted literally of hundreds of election fraud stories (all debunked)? The reality is of course you can prove fraud without voter id. There's just no evidence of widespread fraud occurring. Plenty of evidence of idiots presenting meaningless videos and misinterpreted statistics. No proof that passed the vetting process. You seem obsessed with this. You lost. You lost in a fair election.
-
Based on your history here, you're kidding yourself. You just posted 8 moronic right wing talking points in one post none of which had a glimmer of independent thought. You're no different from the other posters in this forum who have more in common with Alex Jones than Ronald Reagan. I on the other hand have called out dems plenty of times pointing out what I dont like/things I wished they did differently/better. You may not be as looney as some here- some are likely mentally ill to various degrees- but you've jumped on the same train as them. I think that was Greek. Definitely not Russian assuming that's what you were thinking.