JoPoy88

yeah i know. If you read the thread you would have seen it devolved into a political debate though. And the OP, instead of trying to rein in the tangential discussion of: “kraft knew epstein BUT trump knew kraft BUT epstein knew the clintons BUT...” and so on he decided to let it ride and the mods moved it to PPP. And then the OP whined about it the next day. If the topic stayed on kraft I doubt it would have been moved. so there’s your history lesson. Everyone gets 1 for free.

as is the problem in washington, cincinnati and a few other places, the problem in cleveland is ownership. Unfortunately that’s the only guy that can’t get fired.

What’s your point? Can only play the teams put in front of you.

I assume you meant two backup safeties. But point taken - that’s another option to get Duke on the field. We’ll see what the coaches do after today. Not sure they are going to deviate from what they’ve been doing though at this point.

nice Alt account OP.

sunday drinking is fun

we’re comparing Devante Parker and Duke Williams now? This crusade is getting weird.

i mean, it’s related to football to the same degree the Russ Brandon scandal and firing was I suppose.

ah yeah I remember that. Probably because it’s not football related and people were comparing Kraft to Jeffrey Epstein and whatnot.

what?

you sure about that?

You hate to see it...

You can just say it but the Sabres have no relevance here. Ownership’s not making these decisions.

No argument there, I agree.

Eh. i don't feel too bad. Not as bad as say, san diego or oakland, who are both being stripped of their teams. and of course cleveland gets a bump because of lebron and the title he handed that city.

If we flipped and the bills had a top 3 offense and a lower third defense I think we’d be exactly where the chiefs were last year in the AFC. Maybe one slot lower with the emergence of Jackson in Baltimore

Absolutely. There is plenty of time in the offseason for draft talk.

Zero also thought the Chiefs were going to go perfect 19-0 this year so I wouldn’t take him so seriously.

You aren’t serious with this comment are you? Never seen Mahomes play huh. That’s okay.

certainly not a disaster (so far) but it’s too early to say it’s a win-win. I’d think we’d have to wait until Allen gets renewed (or gets to the Super Bowl ?) in order to say that. KC got a MVP QB in the deal, so I have to lean their way right now.

Never asked for a debate, just some clarity. You start a thread on a discussion (key word there) board complaining about complainers and lumping together a wide variety of complaints made by a wide variety of people and saying, what exactly? Can’t tell because you just dismiss anyone asking what you’re actually trying to say. You want all criticisms reserved for losing seasons?

right. So you really don’t have a point. Not one you care to elaborate on at least. Everyone is happy the team is in the playoffs.

i think Motor end up a true no. 1 back someday but besides that I agree. Look what Allen did with just competent receivers this year in brown and beasley. A dominant WR will help immensely.

My theory is that people that are dead set against Allen (and you’re right - there are a few) are lumped together with many more people (like me) who are simply commenting on his struggles and inconsistencies. It’s a bit frustrating just to point out things like his footwork or something else relatively minor for a 2nd year QB and get dismissed, as if I’m implying he can never improve and the bills will always be a WC team at best with Allen at QB. Just my sense on the situation. I’ve seen and commented on his improvements in year 2 and I’ve seen nothing to suggest he’s not going to continue to improve.

what is your point, exactly? That critics should shut up and enjoy the ride? Contribute to the echo chamber or don’t contribute at all? Maybe I missed some nuance in your OP.