Mikie2times

Harris was really bad and after that Biden debacle. who was perhaps even worse, I know I was pretty bitter and angry. I get why some went that way. I know some people I respect a lot that did. But most of them still acknowledge just how bad the guy is. It was mostly a pure political vote or a vote against the left based on the candidates. It’s the fan club that I just can’t understand. Plenty on this forum as well. Maybe they’re just fans of how he deals with the left. But who really knows.

They’re all gross and largely fake. Maybe that is his only redeeming quality. Authenticity, although, it’s just his raw personality that is authentic. That’s largely because he can’t control his emotions. He is still fake in the way most politicians are fake. So is he that much more authenticate than the typical political hack we hate? He would literally be killed 7 times in the movie seven. Kevin Spacey would need 3 more hours of air time for how many times he would have to kill that man. If people want to say well I don’t care because his politics just represent what we needed way more than the liberals. I can accept that a lot more. But my overall view is his voters find him to be a guy that is admirable in a lot of ways. I just don’t know how that reflects on those people. I suppose I have TDS.

This is such a perfect reflection of this man. The pursuit of getting credit is so important. Trying to say you're something vs just being it with a degree of humility. To even question him is to be considered a traitor. If any of your kids behaved this way in a team sport, demanding credit seemingly above all other things you would be so disappointed. It's just insane to me that anybody can find this behavior ok. It doesn't matter if it's a toddler, your boss, the president. Watching people just turn off how big of a scum bag this guy is because he represents the political party they stand for. We have had plenty of crappy presidents. Biden was among the worst, but I don't think it would be physically possible to have a worse human being running this country. THAT is my issue with him, his politics are just whatever. People will always disagree about politics. I hate that the leader of our country is this gross. https://www.axios.com/2025/06/25/trump-iran-nuclear-intelligence-obliterated

He will likely be a grandfather

You’re comically brain washed. Some third rate paper throws up a story by some third rate X poster and that discredits what every global news outlet has reported? The truth is probably in the middle but even that is probably hard for you to manage emotionally. As even your source never said it was destroyed. They said set back. Trump and his grand rhetoric are why we are here. He said it was completely destroyed. Which leaves a big hole that anybody can come into. Now both sides are going to say the other is lying. It’s not completely destroyed. Yes it is, well mostly. Well mostly isn’t completely. CNN, fake news. This country is such a laughing stock. How could it come to this.

I was laying the sarcasm on pretty thick on that

If it’s any consolation I would never count the number of people who agree as proof of anything. That’s said you’re horribly wrong on this one and should feel deep shame and remorse for your thoughts. But do so in an agreeable way please 😂

For as smart as Trump can be at telling a story and misdirection he just flat out encourages this type of push back with how he decides to phrase things. He is the one that linked the success of this mission to total destruction, completely destroying, bla bla. When you constantly use absolute language you leave open a big area that can get challenged. A more measured response and no story. It’s a story because he assured 100% destruction. What his base will eventually land on is “you know what he meant”.

He was 41-55 as a HC before Brady arrived. Andy Reid was 11-13 in the playoffs before Mahomes arrived, McD has a losing record in games Josh Allen doesn't start in. If a coach isn't capable of approaching a similar status as they did with said HOF QB, is it not a reasonable conclusion to say the QB is likely driving more of the outcome than the HC? Plenty of examples exist of HOF QB's with multiple HC's. How many HOF coaches without HOF QB's? It is possible to look at performance separately and draw some conclusions. All of which really don't support what you're saying.

To those that choose to do so. What was Bill without Tom again? Good with that, its not a provable debate really. One of the all time questions of the sport.

Because the QB gives them stability, not the other way around. Very few coaches raise the needle in a significant way. More can lower the needle in a signifigant way. I don't think McD lowers it by any stretch, but I also don't think he's one of the few that raise it. Andy Reid, Sean McVay are two people. Maybe a couple more, but it's a very short list.

Which you can certainly credit McD for. But the narrative that McD groomed Allen just never held up for me. In the early years they barely had a relationship. It was all Dabs. Allen worked a ton with Palmer. He was driven to be great. McD focused on his defense.

The split of who contributed more in that arrangement is overwhelming toward Brady, and yes, Josh would have been just fine in Chicago. Guarantee it. As would have Tom somewhere else. They both didn't need somebody else to tell them to put in the work. This isn't a guy playing in a Bill Walsh mastermind system. Both are primarily defensive coaches who stressed not screwing up. With Josh, so much to the extent that it nearly screwed HIM up.

You're crazy if you think Josh Allen still doesn't become a star without McDermott, but flip that around. I don't think McDermott is able to be so process like without Josh. The entire dynamic changes. Silly argument to take here, you're better off crediting him for picking Josh than developing him. By most accounts he's virtually hands off the offense and has zero experience with QB play.

Its not really "Disgusting". This has been debated to nauseous levels. A path exists to him being even more Marty than Marty. Marty never had Josh Allen. You can choose to acknowledge that or not. The reasons why have been debated a million times. Not getting into it again at this point.

Some valid ones ahead of him, but I can't get on board with Kevin Stefanski. Further, you can certainly make arguments against several others. Also depends on how its being measured. X's and O's and innovation, he would not be in my top 10. Intangibles, he certainly would be. More likely top 5 if not top 3.

It's pretty complicated. Israel doesn't have impunity to act at the moment (from what it would appear). The US has made it pretty clear they don't want this to proceed further. They have a great deal of pride and have been embarrassed over this. If true likely the Nuclear weapon version of nana nana boo boo.

What are they going to show? Some Persians sipping Mai Tai's 😆

You're missing the point. THIS ENTIRE SITUATION IS ABOUT TRUMP. That is the problem I have with Trump.

Sorry captain, the standard set by truth teller is completely obliterated and that golden shower analogy doesn't really hit home (unless it's your home). The White House authenticated it was a real story. To what level remains to be seen. Do you believe those trucks coming and going from the Nuclear facilities were just bringing concrete? You might be right on this. We really don't know, but the president is not right. Its been a couple days and his need for parading himself around before knowing anything is unraveling. Any sensible person would have simply said the mission was a success, we believe the nuclear threat is contained, and our intelligence community will be working hard in the coming days to verify those findings. Instead he chose, obliterated, no longer functional, and completely destroyed. It's the difference between qualified and unqualified, presidential and pedestrian. He was so eager to pat his back he couldn't even wait a few days. I would be more inclined to agree with you if the white house didn't already acknowledge it and it being top secret. Making up as they go is not what this is. It could be incorrect? Sure, Trump could do his best to ensure that is the perception? That's a certainty.

So the white house itself validated that these findings did in fact occur and it was labeled as top secret. Curious, if I say something or if a source just goes rogue with information that is not true does that get marked as top secret as well? "This alleged assessment is flat-out wrong and was classified as 'top secret' but was still leaked to CNN by an anonymous, low-level loser in the intelligence community," White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt told CNN in response to the outlet's reporting. "The leaking of this alleged assessment is a clear attempt to demean President Trump, and discredit the brave fighter pilots who conducted a perfectly executed mission to obliterate Iran's nuclear program," Leavitt added. "Everyone knows what happens when you drop fourteen 30,000 pound bombs perfectly on their targets: total obliteration."

You're posting on your world knowledge and I'm posting on my Trump-centric emotions? When people disagree with Trump they have TDS and when you guys post whatever non stop thread about liberals you do so rationally without the seeming obsession you have? Trump is not an honest person, I expect dishonest people to do dishonest things, betting on dishonest people doing dishonest things is not hard.

You think the they didn't remove the uranium with the time they had? That's just one path. Watching the selective paranoia and conspiracy theories of you guys is incredibly fascinating. Trump says, DESTROYED. Then all of you follow, DESTROYED, no chance! Everything else has to be fake news. Meanwhile you will question why somebody scratched themselves so long as an inbred on X posts about it.

Maybe? I'm not a big Joe supporter, Hunter Biden is meaningless to me along with CNN. For the president to keep stating that the Nuclear program has been destroyed is a lie. I know it's a lie because it would be impossible to verify such a claim in the time it took him to make it. Still no responses in this thread past a flag and X reposts like usual. Between you and Carolina, you have the least engaged content on this forum and do so over and over and over. Has to be a sign of strength in your personal life. I never said they would use it, I said they would keep pursuing it and have the means to do so. But if this is really true, then what was this over?