Mikie2times

Von pre injury was a massive difference maker for us. But I will say even before injury Bosa is a bit more complete. It’s important for us that our defensive ends can play the run so I think Bosa playing at a high level is probably a better fit for us.

Hard to tell who has the broken nose

Let’s try something that has never happened in twobillsdrive history. I will walk @Mister Defense off the ledge 😂. But in all seriousness, it’s never as good or bad as it seems. I’m thrilled at how Bosa has played thus far. I’m thrilled at the proposition of getting back a lot of talent as the season progresses. We will have some stinkers, we will make some plays. I hope to see progress as much as possible especially right now and after that dismantling by Baltimore. I think we can put a big old check for progress this week. It’s also nice knowing that even you have some doubts from time to time. Eternally optimistic or pessimistic are probably both off base.

I thought he got poked in the eye. But I never thought it was a serious injury. By serious, breaking a nose isn’t nothing. But ligaments or missing games, etc

I think what will hurt Glenn schematically is the man dependence. It’s how he likes to play and Allen has gone next level against primary man teams like the Jaguars or Lions last year. It really opens his running when everybody running with a WR

We are 1-2, with one three point win in NY the last 3 years. Missing Oliver, who kept this defense alive last week. As others have stated, this is basically Baltimore light. Betting line has been coming down. To me this is a no brainer. Its going to be a close game.

So non religious people can’t be moral?

We live in the only democracy in the world?

I didn't say it was a political issue, I said it was a religious issue, which is why I put up a religious poll. Most democrats are religious. 70% of the United States is. Those that are not religious overwhelmingly don't support it. I said it was a amendment rooted in religion more than moral grounds. Which it is.

Because 86% of non religious people support abortion. Apparently the other 14% on this forum.

I wonder what % of people are religious that support banning abortions. If it wasn't a religious issue I would expect that to be fairly neutral right?

So the groups that pursued the federal amendment did so for moral reasons and not religious reasons?

So it's not a religious issue?

I mean, I think women should have the right to do what they want with their body? The right to life movement is not on moral grounds, it's on religious grounds. We are supposed to have clear separation of church and state. So now we are seeing rights taken away for religious reasons right?

I don't keep up as much with the trendy "gotcha" stuff. My attention is more on limiting peoples rights for religious purposes.

Most of us just want equality and basic separation of church and state.

So your position is Trump exaggerating less than Joe Biden? Are you F'n serious?

Most "liberals" don't believe in the one issue you want to target. As much as you want that to be the case. Most republicans don't believe in removing access to abortions. Yet here were are withe parties representing things we don't believe in as a nation. The president has been a walking caricature of grandiose statements from day one. It's literally who he is. It doesn't matter what political spectrum you fall in. To hear somebody say "I think the left has a problem with extreme positions" with the sitting president being Donald Trump is utterly hilarious.

You see what you care to see. Idiots everywhere with extreme takes, most of all in the White House.

Dying, I love these

It's a single stat from a single game, but it's really not a bad stat as all encompassing statistics go. I like EPA more personally. Then you have EPA hybrid stats which probably are even better, but I prefer simplicity when getting advanced. In any event, this is QBR from last year. It has Lamar and Josh with an identical rating. So while most people had Lamar with better stats, QBR didn't measure any separation. Unlike QB rating, it includes rushing performance. So I do like that element to it and generally find it to be a solid indicator as sample size grows.

It’s a lot more possible than harsher penalties as was implied by the poster I was responding to. But that’s a much longer conversation at this point.