hjnick

I agree, the 3rd is too early for Hubbard. I think we will have to trade back into the 4th round to get him. I think the first 3 picks can be used for better positions than RB. I doubt he would last into the 5th round... but you never know w/ RBs they slip down the board sometimes.

If Farley drops, I'd like to pick him up. A BIG fatty at the 1 Tech to replace star after this year. Chubba Hubbard at RB in later rounds. The dude can fly. Need to add a new RB stud to the corral every year.

Phillips shores up the DE spot and then a big fattie to take star's place after next year? I like this alot.

@Virgil Thank you for taking your time and doing these mock drafts. I always enjoy watching/reading them.

could we add Quinn Meinerz OG also?

Teven Jenkins was already drafted in 1st round. Alijah Vera-Tucker was also drafted.

Can either of those DT's replace Star? Are they big space eaters? Thx

A Josh Allen gofundme salary reduction! I like it!

Ok, I tried to run the numbers on each of the trades, as per the attachment below (using the year/round less theory). Trade value chart: https://www.drafttek.com/NFL-Trade-Value-Chart.asp To me, Miami did not get the better of each of those deals if you run it by the numbers... For the SF/Mia trade, by the numbers, SF's compensation for the #3 pick never reaches the 2200 needed. Also, Miami did not get any additional compensation KNOWING this is for a QB, which is a premium position. THEN, trading back up to 6, again they don't win by the numbers... Overall, they move from 3 to 6 and pickup only 1 additional first rounder. By the numbers, this does not look like great trade(s). Now, from a non numbers perspective, they trade with SF was a great trade IMO. You picked up 2 additional #1s. THEN you trade 1 to philly just to go up 6 spots... Not a good trade IMO, especially as someone else said, they didn't need to make that trade right now. They could have waited until the draft or close to it to move up... BTW, with the year/round theory, I would gladly trade my 2nd round pick every year for a 1st in the next year (since they are equivalent).... DO you think any other GM would be willing to do that for us???

Couple of more bargain signing and we are gonna trade all our picks for philly #1 and we take Pitts...

What a dope.

Not sure, but the Orig Post said we scored 30 pts in 10 games in the third. guess we hit field goals.

Early in the year, it felt like we got more conservative offensively starting the second half.... letting teams catch back up to us... guess we learned that lesson (of what NOT to do)in the off week.

2 things: 1. I would like to see how many players were signed for each team. I bet Buffalo signed more players than the others. 2. Those other teams don’t have a QB the caliber of Josh Allen.

Thank you for posting. Great video

So a sports massage includes an ending that's happy??? 😆

Hope he kicks the Cowboys ass.... twice.

Don't remember the exact year, but I remember seeing Joe Ferguson at QB and Joe Cribbs at RB. I think it was Chuck Knox was coach.

I don't know how Beane is pulling off all this resigning magic, but wow. With these resigning, places where could be the best to upgrade is: CB, RB, WR, TE. Now, I do not want to draft a RB at 30, but I can now see how Beane could if he wanted to with these resigning filling major holes. I still think trading back is the right move back. Grab another pick in the 2nd or 3rd round (throw in a late draft pick if needed). I'd still like to get a G/C, DT (big fatty), WR, RB, CB2 in the early rounds of the draft.

I was just listening to a podcast talking about the potential for a Russell Wilson trade to Chicago. They were saying that Seattle would have to take a 32MIL cap hit this year to trade him and if they waited until June 1 they could spread it over 2 years, BUT you can't get any picks this year in the draft for compensation. Also, Seattle is only 5 MIL under the cap right now, so they would actually have to cut players to trade Wilson and if they got Mack back in the deal, they would have to open up even MORE cap space to accommodate his salary (14MIL I think). It sounds like Seattle does not want to trade Wilson, but he really wants out of Seattle (also like Watson in Houston). So, why does Seattle or Houston have to bend over and take such a large cap hit to trade these players? They should ask Wilson or Watson to return a large chunk of their signing bonus back to the team, which would lessen they cap hit on the team, which would make them more easier to trade. THEN let Wilson or Watson renegotiate before the trade with their new team for a contract to get them REPAID (eventually). I think this is a fair way to get a player moved and the team doesn't have to take such a drastic cap hit and have to cut players just to trade a player.

I think this offseason will play to Beane's strengths. I think he will not be active in early free agency. He will wait his time until some good players still will not have teams and when pick up quality backups at multiple positions. I think he will draft a guard/center early in the draft, a DT space eater so he can jettison Star's contract next year, a mid round RB (would love Chubba Hubbard here), another WR to fight for playing time.

My philosophy on this is the opposite, I'd like to pick up a RB in almost every draft in the mid to late rounds and just keep cycling thru them cheaply. We will win based on Allen's arm, not who is running behind them. Eventually, you will find good runners in the later rounds. (cheaply)

Who?