He’s not a top t.e. Because of his athleticism at this point. He’s like a quality vet 6 man in basketball. He gets his numbers and contributes in a meaningful way. The chiefs are going to keep winning for years to come.
I don’t think he’s earned a huge extension yet, was hoping he played his way into one this year. Now I hope he out performs the contract.
This really could be another awful extension for beane.
your quarterback accounting for 88% of your offense is a problem if you lose or don’t score enough.
this is all part of a bigger conversation about how you define what a quarterback is. the reality is the quarterback is dependent on the system they're in (play calling and design) as much as their attributes; it’s a marriage.
People like to imagine what the 49ers would look like with josh Allen at quarterback. Imagining 600 yards of offense and 8 touchdowns every game. this wouldn’t happen because the marriage of system and quarterback in San Francisco is already operating at a super high level. (You only get the ball so many times a game)
The current best marriage in the nfl is mahomes and Reid. They’re winning by eliminating mistakes on offense and playing great defense. The Brady/Belichick method.
I appreciate the fandom, but this is not in touch with reality. besides josh we don’t have any player in the discussion of best at their position. (Kincaid has a chance)
there’s a few borderline pro-bowlers, but zero potential hall of famers.
This is like that old joke where someone talks about how much money Michael Jordan makes and what one could do with that much money and how much it breaks down to in dollars per second etc. The punchline is something like, bill gates makes 100 times that.
nvidia netted more money last quarter than the NFL grossed all of last year.
What you have is owners that are willing to sign wr’s to huge contacts because they make it up in jersey sales. It’s the opposite of money-ball approach.
It ultimately isn't sustainable if you want to win superbowls (imo).