DCOrange

Much like I said I’d continue to say Cleveland will target Tyrod until it actually happened, I’ll continue to expect Buffalo to target Josh Allen or Sam Darnold until it actually happens.

Hot damn Cleveland listened to me!

He still doesn't create much separation, but he's so physically imposing that it doesn't matter at all. He's "open" on pretty much every play.

He's a good football player

Mayfield meets the Parcells criteria as well, but I think the Parcell rules are outdated personally.

If Baltimore were willing to attach an early draft pick to get Buffalo to take Flacco, I'd consider it, but that's probably the only way.

Might be the first time I've been happy with a Trapasso mock.

If Richardson is actually getting $10 million I wouldn't bother. If he's that close to what Allen Robinson will get, I'd definitely prefer Robinson. Not sure Beane plans to spend a lot in free agency based on the Ivory/Vontae signings though.

For more context behind the history of the ball velocity stuff: https://www.dawgsbynature.com/2017/3/10/14890754/cleveland-browns-2017-nfl-scouting-combine-qb-velocity

I believe he was exactly 49 as well.

For those that might be wondering, basically anyone that throws less than 55 MPH has no chance of being successful in the NFL. Only like 2 QBs have been and one of those 2 is Tyrod. Notable guys that didn't make the cut: Mason Rudolph Kyle Lauletta Lamar Jackson Luke Falk Allen broke the record for strongest arm ever and Baker Mayfield is top 5 all time. http://www.ourlads.com/story/default/Quarterback-Ball-Velocity-at-2018-NFL-Combine/10241/dh/ Edit: I should add that tracking the ball velocity is still pretty young (I believe only going back to 2008 if I remember right), but the lack of success for anyone under 55 is pretty scary.

The big thing I know him from is his charting of all the QB's passes. He breaks down how well-placed all of their throws are, broken down by different situations (clean pocket, under pressure, when they roll out and get their feet set versus when they throw on the run, etc.) He's not high on Josh Allen; basically said he's on par with Kurt Benkert as a developmental prospect.

I had heard whispers that the Patriots and Seahawks were talking about a Sherman trade a few weeks ago; curious to see if it turns out to be true. One of the deals they supposedly discussed was simply swapping Sherman for Gronk but I have a hard time believing that's what will actually happen.

I've watched almost every Louisville game from the last two years. You can see it in one of the charts at the link below. Edit: It should be noted that these numbers have slightly moved around since I originally posted it; I think I threw those charts together prior to the bowl games. https://www.buffalorumblings.com/2017/12/14/16776108/more-ncaa-qb-charts

If Louisville's WRs could catch footballs, nobody would be discussing Lamar's completion percentage. When accounting for all of the QBs dropped passes, Lamar's completion % is higher than Sam Darnold.

Sure, but he was nowhere near Fournette, Yeldon, or Corey Grant for that matter in terms of his running. He was sadly the best pass blocker on the team though according to PFF.

Ivory graded out as the #78 pass blocker in the league at the RB position this past season on top of being one of the worst runners. He finished 5th in 2015

I know it's not; that's why I said kinda Matt Ryan. His completion percentage would suggest he was absolutely inaccurate but it was more spotty accuracy rather than legitimately inaccurate for him. Stafford and Cam were definitely inaccurate despite Cam's stats suggesting otherwise.

Matt Stafford, Cam Newton, kinda Matt Ryan

Lamar remains my preferred choice followed by Darnold and Allen.

I agree with the principle in general, but I disagree with this meaning that Buffalo shouldn't try for a QB this year. This is a great draft for QBs. Five 1st round caliber prospects. The key is not overreaching in the middle rounds where it's pretty weak. In my mind, there are 5 1st round caliber QB prospects and 1 2nd round caliber. Outside of those 6, I wouldn't bother touching a QB until late on Day 3, but I'd absolutely try to get one of those top 6 guys. This kind of principle is also part of what makes the Ivory signing so bad. RB is incredibly strong this year and now Buffalo decided to invest a lot of money in a backup when they certainly could have gotten their backup in the draft at a far cheaper price.

In terms of the likely cap hit, some guys that were paid less last year: Frank Gore Rex Burkhead CJ Anderson Latavious Murray Alfred Morris Danny Woodhead Jamaal Charles LeGarrette Blount There will likely be a bunch of free agent RBs that sign for less than this, especially considering how deep this year's draft is at the position. I mean, Blount got $1.3 million last year after rushing for 18 TDs the prior year. Guaranteeing a guy over $3 million to be a backup just doesn't make sense in today's environment, especially when you already have a high-priced starter. Edit: His cap hit might come in under Gore, Burkhead, and Anderson depending on the way it's structured.

Isn't that kind of the point though? Buffalo could have easily gotten someone on a rookie deal that would likely be a better player too. He's roughly one of the 20 highest paid RBs next season.

This seems like a pretty poor signing on the surface, but maybe it suggests that the front office isn't planning on spending much in free agency so that they were okay paying Ivory this much. I suppose it at least allows Buffalo to focus on getting a good RB in the draft rather than specifically looking for a power back, but I can't help but think that Buffalo could have gotten a better option signed at a cheaper price. They're paying him like a starting RB.

I'd be happy to have him back.