Correct me if I'm wrong. I'm trying to get a full understanding of what you're saying. So if I have this right, you have to win a superbowl in order to be considered the best. I disagree with that because the NFL is a team sport. As we saw last night, a QB can only do so much. He doesn't play defense. You said earlier McDermott f'd up and doesn't give Josh a win. So that's not Josh's fault and it shouldn't factor in him being considered the best or not. By winning the Superbowl logic, does that mean Trent Dilfer is a better QB than Josh? Nick Foles?