Buffalo03

You're saying he has to score on that drive. The pass he tries score on, he gets bumped as he throws it, otherwise it's a catch. He only had one other down after that to get a TD before the field goal. Like seriously, how do you put that on Allen at all?

Well, he got hit throwing to Shakir so......

Herbert does have Harbaugh now so we will see. I personally think Allen doesn't win one. Not with us any way so technically, I guess you can say Herbert can get one over Allen

No, I love it. I always hated the sudden death that it originally was

If you're gonna use PEDs, you should at least some semblance of being good. Using PEDs to still suck is next level stupid

These posts get dumber and dumber by the day. Congratulations, you are the winner today. What's the headline gonna be for the next dumb poster tomorrow? "Allen is a poodle, Mahomes is a Rottweiler. Allen needs to be a Rottweiler". I can't wait to read it

Yeah, those were the ones I was referring to. The Boomer Esiason jerseys

Go back to their 80s and early to mid 90s jerseys with the Jet as the T over the word Jets

I'm not missing the point. I know the point you are trying to make. What I am telling you is, no matter what you show me, we are not winning a championship

Lo Lol. They also had 2 championships with Elway. Big difference. If they didn't win with Manning. It wouldn't have been a big deal

Replace the guy that can't get past the divisional round with the guy that is 0-2 in the Super Bowl. Seems legit

I would draft 2 WRs and say "f*ck the salary cap" and bring in Danielle Hunter or Brian Burns who will both be free agents. I'm tired of not having that elite pass rusher. Danielle Hunter just had a 16 sack season at 29. We can get 3 good years out of him

No. Just truth

That's the truth. Only there will never be an ending year for the Bills

If he was Beane he would get blasted for Mecole Hardman and Skyy Moore in the 2nd, a 1st on Clyde Edwards-Helaire and trading for Kadarius Toney. But it's Brett Veach so he has to be praised

But what you're saying is we make one more play than they do in a game and we are the better team but because we didn't, we're not. There's more to it than that

It's not my heart lol. 2 or 3 plays being different is what makes us better than the Chiefs apparently but because we didn't get those 2 or 3 plays, it means they are clearly better. That's literally the mindset of people here

If you wanna tell me the Bengals are better than us, I will listen to that. That is a team that has physically manhandled us WAY more than the Chiefs have. They destroyed us in the playoffs and then the game against them this year wasn't much better. We are literally a couple flipped plays of being better than the Chiefs. We are miles behind the Bengals in my opinion

Is Andy Reid clearly better than McDermott? Yes absolutely. Are the Chiefs as a team clearly better than the Bills? A difference of 2 or 3 plays in 2 playoff games and we are the better team. If it's as simple as "they won, they're better". Than if 13 second doesn't happen, they're still better? If we somehow got a defensive stop if Shakir catches that TD, then we're better? Like I have said, the 49ers are better than both the Packers and Lions but should have lost both games. If the Lions or Packers win either game, it doesn't make them the better team.

OK. for the record. I said myself that even if Allen hit that pass, we probably still don't win that game because we didn't stop them defensively all game. Those were my own words. I'm not naive enough to think we would have stopped them. My point I've been trying to make is IF IIIIIIIIIIIFFFFFF we hit that pass and got the luckiest break in the world on defense after that to win that game, we are all of a sudden better because we beat them, right? But because we didn't, that's everyone's reason to say they're better?

But the 49ers beat them. The 49ers should have lost to both the Packers and Lions. They didn't play well but the 49ers are better than both teams. My point is, if the 49ers had lost one of those games, it just means those teams were better on that day, not that they were the better team in general

They aren't destroying us. If McDermott doesn't have one of the biggest head coaching blunders in team history in 13 seconds....guess what? People would say we were the better team. If Allen hits Shalir in the end zone and we stop the Chiefs on their next drive....guess what? We're better than the Chiefs. Or would they still have been better if they lost both times?

If Allen hits Shakir and we win we're better? But because he didn't, we aren't? Do I have this right?

They damn near beat the 49ers as the youngest team in the playoffs and damn well should have beaten them. And if they did, it doesn't make them the better team. The 49ers are better than them right now but nearly got beat by them in the playoffs. That's my point.

Do you think the 49ers are a much better team than the Packers?