Jump to content

Richard Noggin

Community Member
  • Posts

    4,411
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Richard Noggin

  1. Amen. But, don't be a size queen.
  2. Uninformed question that Google could answer: is this Corey Dillon's kid?
  3. Ah yes, the provocateur lies to stir up trouble. Part of the conspiratorial playbook. Could smell that from far off. Thanks for doing the legwork.
  4. The conspiracy theorist is strong in this one. And the evidence is nonexistent, at least here.
  5. Yeah, we've all been victimized by it. But am I being a jerk about this in some way that I'm not seeing that's causing this humorless response? I'm playing around with words here and you're defending yourself as though any of this matters. It's cool. Forget I made a joke about you criticizing someone else's "half-with" whatever.
  6. The WGR guys fully recognize and lament the state of the Sabres. No doubt. I'm not sure where you're coming from with this. OBL is a different beast all together. Murph and Tasker are employed by the Bills directly. And broadcast on WGR. It's different than the radio hosts.
  7. I say stupid things all the time. I'm a real Richard that way. But you gotta admit, yours was particularly ironic. Don't ya think?
  8. Reasonable take. One could argue Dawson Knox appears to possess high end athleticism. "Top speed" is not a very holistic assessment of explosiveness or agility (although many of the fast guys are those things as well). But yeah, your conclusion is difficult to dispute.
  9. No doubt Daboll is a Belichick disciple, in that he's been cross-trained on both sides of the ball, and values the schematic flexibility to attack defenses in multiple ways. I wonder if such multiplicity requires, at least for Daboll's offense, a playbook that is voluminous and intricate to a fault. Smoke Brown has admitted it's the most difficult offense he's ever learned. I'll bet other players feel similarly. Does that result in more errors on the field? More thinking and less play-making? Didn't the offense this season seem to hit its stride when they shifted mostly to one personnel package (11-personnel) and a no-huddle approach? You know, when Daboll simplified his gameplans?
  10. My second job, at a local high-end restaurant, virtually guarantees I'm unable to watch anything on Saturdays from 4 pm to about midnight. The generationally-indelible Bengals-vs-Steelers outcome two years ago? Yep, I was working. Kind of ironic given our access to the Bills and Sabres over the years, that we'd miss such historically significant contests due to the job...but I'm mostly convinced the wildcard game will be Saturday at 4:30. Can I afford to quit? THAT'S the question...
  11. "OCCASIONALLY BLURRING the line between fair and dirty play" (emphasis mine). Those first two words are a rhetorical effing ski jump of understatement, in light of the tapes that emerged and the penalties enacted (as mentioned, as though in passing, in the very next sentence).
  12. Funny. I will say that watching him make fun of Trent Richardson's bad footwork was kind of hilarious. I think we'd just signed Shady and Whaley was showing off a bit, ragging on a guy he refused to even look at in the draft and then later when he got traded to/from Indy. The particulars get hazy. Whaley took about a dozen heavy steps back and forth while pantomiming taking a hand-off.
  13. I had some decent access to Brandon and Marrone and Whaley and Rex and that whole futile era of the team (and the corresponding Sabres personnel); McBeane runs a much tighter, less public operation. Definitely overheard some things from coaches, owners, execs, and players throughout the years. I'm hesitant to tell stories out of school, as it's part of my job to treat such high-profile clientele with discretion...
  14. As a server at one of the above mentioned establishments, I can assure you Buffalo athletes are in there all the time. Not as often as when Russ Brandon ran the teams, but still often enough.
  15. Apologies, I didn't realize he got the Zay Jones seal of approval! Enough said. Carry on. But for real, I know he was HIGHLY productive for a decent stretch. Was he doing so as a featured boundary receiver running the full route tree? Did he benefit from scheme and slot alignments? I'm a bit "bearish" on Rams offensive personnel having similar production in different systems.
  16. This. We simply CANNOT know the answer, but we must consider the question. I thought Allen looked fairly dialed in tonight, and that they should have put the game on his shoulders more in the second half. He obviously responded following that chicken-$#!t red zone sequence that resulted in (an admittedly important) field goal. If you want to run to milk the clock, at least do so out of 11-personnel, right? Give the defense something to think about, and the offense an ability to audible/attack if the D over-commits to the run. That predictable, tight-formation approach has not been effective.
  17. You see him as a "NUMBER ONE" receiver in a different offense? Okay, I'll bite: why? I don't follow the Rams closely, but when I do watch them, it seems like Woods is every bit as integral, if nor more so. Is Kupp injured in recent weeks? Help me see what you see, Inspector...
  18. The drops are clearly a problem for this offense. I thought Allen was fairly locked in early, and Beasley carries some blame in ending two first half drives. That's at least two interceptions we can pin on #10 this season. He's a small guy who probably has relatively small hands for an NFL receiver. That's been an issue. Gotta have those plays. As the broadcast illustrated for us with an info-graphic, Bills starting wide receivers are short. And my observation has been that they, outside of Brown (WHO ALSO HAD ALLIGATOR ARMS ON A BIG PLAY EARLY IN THE GAME), don't make difficult or contested catches with enough frequency. Not every pass will be perfect, no matter who the QB is. But "complete" receivers will more often win (or at least play effective defense) on a big time 50/50 ball where his QB puts it up and gives him an opportunity. Smoke has made a few such catches this season. Little guys like Hill in K.C. can do it. But imagine having a big, long boundary receiver who specializes in high-pointing the ball...it's why some fans are so obsessed with Duke Williams. We lack that facet of our passing attack.
  19. So, if I may paraphrase: I have no evidence or personal experience to back this up, but here's my uninformed opinion anyways... Carry on.
  20. Americans, especially young Americans, don't participate in our democratic processes, but they sure do like their consumer processes...
  21. Like The Office, only slightly less lovable and funny and cathartic (unless of course their very real and paradoxical blend of hubris and existential panic does in fact lead to a third documented case of misconduct). Dunder Mifflin had a lesser known Foxboro branch, apparently.
×
×
  • Create New...