Jump to content

Billsfansinceday1

Community Member
  • Posts

    904
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Billsfansinceday1

  1. Good stuff. Thanks, Cover1. It is too bad Dawkins could,'t spend more time at RT in the preseason, but that will come.
  2. The fact is that Gilmore fluctuated from very good to very awful. I, for one, will not miss him.
  3. The Pats defense was pretty suspect in the Super Bowl as well. I am not drawing any conclusions yet but it is worth watching.
  4. Stretch as in Mr Fantastic of the Fantastic Four. I honestly believe this is a much better team than most suspect.
  5. There are going to be some very unhappy Vlad haters today. They will need to find something else to fret about.
  6. You left off the sarcasm part...this is sarcasm isn't it?
  7. I would love to see Jordan Johnson on the PS. I assume that would have happened by now if it was going to.
  8. Great news on a very confusing day. Many here were very impressed with Reilly and Shorts and they are now on he PS. I suspect one of both will be on the roster in the near future.
  9. I agree. I saw it this morning and thought NO WAY. Great call on a lousy move. My hope is that Banyard can fill in for TD Mike amd JW.
  10. I wasn't really serious about the Brady he part but won't be surprised if another team doesn't snatch him up after this preseason.
  11. We will be pretty close to you. Sec 132 Row 6. Enjoy the game!
  12. I agree as do many others. I will be shocked if he isn't on the PS unless picked up by the Patriots. How good would he be with Brady throwing to him?
  13. Ok but you said in the playoff seasons not appearances. That would be different.
  14. Where did you get that info? Peyton was much better than that, although he did throw more ints than TDs in his first year: He never had a QB rating of 50 in his career. PASSING Year Team G Att Comp Pct Att/G Yds Avg Yds/G TD TD% Int Int% Lng 20+ 40+ Sck SckY Rate 2015 Denver Broncos 10 331 198 59.8 33.1 2,249 6.8 224.9 9 2.7 17 5.1 75T 24 7 16 95 67.9 2014 Denver Broncos 16 597 395 66.2 37.3 4,727 7.9 295.4 39 6.5 15 2.5 86T 66 11 17 118 101.5 2013 Denver Broncos 16 659 450 68.3 41.2 5,477 8.3 342.3 55 8.3 10 1.5 78T 68 13 18 120 115.1 2012 Denver Broncos 16 583 400 68.6 36.4 4,659 8.0 291.2 37 6.3 11 1.9 71T 64 7 21 137 105.8 2011 Indianapolis Colts 0 -- -- -- 0.0 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 0.0 2010 Indianapolis Colts 16 679 450 66.3 42.4 4,700 6.9 293.8 33 4.9 17 2.5 73T 43 9 16 91 91.9 2009 Indianapolis Colts 16 571 393 68.8 35.7 4,500 7.9 281.2 33 5.8 16 2.8 80T 59 8 10 74 99.9 2008 Indianapolis Colts 16 555 371 66.8 34.7 4,002 7.2 250.1 27 4.9 12 2.2 75 40 7 14 86 95.0 2007 Indianapolis Colts 16 515 337 65.4 32.2 4,040 7.8 252.5 31 6.0 14 2.7 73T 53 9 21 124 98.0 2006 Indianapolis Colts 16 557 362 65.0 34.8 4,397 7.9 274.8 31 5.6 9 1.6 68T 53 7 14 86 101.0 2005 Indianapolis Colts 16 453 305 67.3 28.3 3,747 8.3 234.2 28 6.2 10 2.2 80T 45 6 17 81 104.1 2004 Indianapolis Colts 16 497 336 67.6 31.1 4,557 9.2 284.8 49 9.9 10 2.0 80T 68 13 13 101 121.1 2003 Indianapolis Colts 16 566 379 67.0 35.4 4,267 7.5 266.7 29 5.1 10 1.8 79T 45 9 18 107 99.0 2002 Indianapolis Colts 16 591 392 66.3 36.9 4,200 7.1 262.5 27 4.6 19 3.2 69 51 11 23 145 88.8 2001 Indianapolis Colts 16 547 343 62.7 34.2 4,131 7.6 258.2 26 4.8 23 4.2 86T 55 11 29 232 84.1 2000 Indianapolis Colts 16 571 357 62.5 35.7 4,413 7.7 275.8 33 5.8 15 2.6 78T 51 8 20 131 94.7 1999 Indianapolis Colts 16 533 331 62.1 33.3 4,135 7.8 258.4 26 4.9 15 2.8 80T 56 11 14 116 90.7 1998 Indianapolis Colts 16 575 326 56.7 35.9 3,739 6.5 233.7 26 4.5 28 4.9 78T 42 8 22 109 71.2 TOTAL 266 9,380 6,125 65.3 35.3 71,940 7.7 270.5 539 5.7 251 2.7 86 883 155 303 1,953 96.5 PASSING Year Team G Att Comp Pct Att/G Yds Avg Yds/G TD TD% Int Int% Lng 20+ 40+ Sck SckY Rate 2015 Denver Broncos 10 331 198 59.8 33.1 2,249 6.8 224.9 9 2.7 17 5.1 75T 24 7 16 95 67.9 2014 Denver Broncos 16 597 395 66.2 37.3 4,727 7.9 295.4 39 6.5 15 2.5 86T 66 11 17 118 101.5 2013 Denver Broncos 16 659 450 68.3 41.2 5,477 8.3 342.3 55 8.3 10 1.5 78T 68 13 18 120 115.1 2012 Denver Broncos 16 583 400 68.6 36.4 4,659 8.0 291.2 37 6.3 11 1.9 71T 64 7 21 137 105.8 2011 Indianapolis Colts 0 -- -- -- 0.0 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 0.0 2010 Indianapolis Colts 16 679 450 66.3 42.4 4,700 6.9 293.8 33 4.9 17 2.5 73T 43 9 16 91 91.9 2009 Indianapolis Colts 16 571 393 68.8 35.7 4,500 7.9 281.2 33 5.8 16 2.8 80T 59 8 10 74 99.9 2008 Indianapolis Colts 16 555 371 66.8 34.7 4,002 7.2 250.1 27 4.9 12 2.2 75 40 7 14 86 95.0 2007 Indianapolis Colts 16 515 337 65.4 32.2 4,040 7.8 252.5 31 6.0 14 2.7 73T 53 9 21 124 98.0 2006 Indianapolis Colts 16 557 362 65.0 34.8 4,397 7.9 274.8 31 5.6 9 1.6 68T 53 7 14 86 101.0 2005 Indianapolis Colts 16 453 305 67.3 28.3 3,747 8.3 234.2 28 6.2 10 2.2 80T 45 6 17 81 104.1 2004 Indianapolis Colts 16 497 336 67.6 31.1 4,557 9.2 284.8 49 9.9 10 2.0 80T 68 13 13 101 121.1 2003 Indianapolis Colts 16 566 379 67.0 35.4 4,267 7.5 266.7 29 5.1 10 1.8 79T 45 9 18 107 99.0 2002 Indianapolis Colts 16 591 392 66.3 36.9 4,200 7.1 262.5 27 4.6 19 3.2 69 51 11 23 145 88.8 2001 Indianapolis Colts 16 547 343 62.7 34.2 4,131 7.6 258.2 26 4.8 23 4.2 86T 55 11 29 232 84.1 2000 Indianapolis Colts 16 571 357 62.5 35.7 4,413 7.7 275.8 33 5.8 15 2.6 78T 51 8 20 131 94.7 1999 Indianapolis Colts 16 533 331 62.1 33.3 4,135 7.8 258.4 26 4.9 15 2.8 80T 56 11 14 116 90.7 1998 Indianapolis Colts 16 575 326 56.7 35.9 3,739 6.5 233.7 26 4.5 28 4.9 78T 42 8 22 109 71.2 TOTAL 266 9,380 6,125 65.3 35.3 71,940 7.7 270.5 539 5.7 251 2.7 86 883 155 303 1,953 96.5 Sorry. The above stats did not copy very well.
  15. I think you are being unusually kind here. He is worse than that.
  16. Speaking only for myself, I am definitely convinced. Regardless of the money, Dareus for Osweiler is craziness.
  17. Our offense ended up 10th in the NFL in scoring with 24.9 PPG. The defense let us down badly, notably by allowing 4th quarter comebacks. If not for the defense, we would have been contenders for the playoffs. That doesn't mean that our offense was blameless, just that they were good enough to win more games than they did.
×
×
  • Create New...