1ManRaid

Only 65? Judging from the view of the end zone cam behind the posts, probably would have been good from 70. I hope they let him unload on a couple record attempts late in the season when he already has his Pro Bowl status secured. Maybe on a "fair catch free kick", he could easily put one through on one of those.

Cost me $10 on a bet that the final score total would be an even number. *edit* But to be fair, the TD did win me multiple other bets leading to a net profit on the day, so I wasn't too broken up over it.

Hopefully the guy I replied to reads this and considers how it might feel for a RUNNING BACK to have one in their FOOT.

I saw the broadcasted replay and sure enough hand comes up and POP goes the helmet.

I don't want to go back to the days of "95% chance this is a run, Spiller is on the field" with them knowing it's a run outside because Breida is on the field. If you can't run, just throw it.

If you want to discount the refs gifting them a no call for encroachment to deny us points going into the half (cost me money on props bets), and a TD from a no call on a hands to the face that took Hughes' helmet off (supposedly there was also OPI?).

And then scored on 4 straight drives because that's something we can do now. Halftime adjustment.

Yeah they allowed a whole 3 points in only a single half lol. Would it have been too much to ask to shut them out again?

I think he has mental health issues of his own if he has multi year gaps in his memory. Don’t count on him to get them treated though...

The lack of speed isn't causing the poor run blocking and play calls.

I take it you've never had a bone bruise. I had one on my elbow when I played high school baseball (fastball off the elbow) and they wouldn't let me play that week.

When did they need a loss? We can win by 50 and certain people will still be calling for the head of Edmunds, Devin, Daboll, etc because we didn't win by 60.

Not touching that price with his injury risk.

I'm generally not one to call rigged, but that call was especially egregious. The ball was spotted behind the LoS, nevermind the first down line. If I owned the Packers, I'd be buying a tank to bust through the league office doors to raise hell that it wasn't stopped for review.

That's how you beat the refs. Blatantly handed Murray a first down and I don't even like the Packers.

Hide your affairs partners...

Weird, not many objected to the rule when it saved a Josh Allen fumble for a touchback when he dove for the goal line last year (I think)...

You seem to forget they would have to play in our bad weather too. Let the weather and crowd noise keep Tannehill down, while we key in on Henry. Allen has shown the ability to play in bad weather.

Are you implying that hit was intentional?

A player took a knee to the face like that in a Toronto Maple Leafs game last offseason, and it was the longest on ice delay I've ever seen. Football helmets doing their job.

Celebrating injuries is not a good look.

I'm too impressed with him to be mad, like getting dunked on by Jordan despite being sure you had him perfectly defended.

No, you only posted a general rule about PI, and then gave your own incorrect interpretation of it to shoehorn in why you think the rule was applied incorrectly. That's not listing them, it's a single reference. For the record, the initial hampering of Diggs' ability to catch the ball occurred at the 5 yard line, not in the end zone. That's why it was marked at the 5. You for some reason keep arguing the infraction at the 5 didn't count because it wasn't closer to where the ball ended up which is irrelevant.

Do you?

That's not how "uncatchable" works. It was only uncatchable by virtue of the foul from the defender. You only rule uncatchable if the receiver wouldn't have had a reasonable ability to make a play on the ball even if he wasn't interfered with, such as the ball being thrown 5 yards out of bounds.