
Watkins90
Community Member-
Posts
2,481 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Gallery
Profiles
Forums
Events
Everything posted by Watkins90
-
Bills Patriots 2nd half thread
Watkins90 replied to BuffaloBill's topic in The Stadium Wall Archives
Lmao, Lawson is not a bust. All people care about is sacks for defensive linemen, but that isn't what Shaq Lawson is. He is a running stopping outside defender. He has actually done his job as the Bills have been gashed up the middle today, not on the edge. -
Bills Patriots 2nd half thread
Watkins90 replied to BuffaloBill's topic in The Stadium Wall Archives
We are playing for our playoff hopes here. With Baltimore cruising against Detriot, we need this win to keep pace. If we don't win this, I doubt we make the playoffs at 9-7. -
Bills and Patriots 1st half thread
Watkins90 replied to BuffaloBill's topic in The Stadium Wall Archives
Because you are hoping to save time to see if you can get a good run back on the kickoff. Maybe set your self up to be in field goal range before the half ends. -
Bills and Patriots 1st half thread
Watkins90 replied to BuffaloBill's topic in The Stadium Wall Archives
I think he was trying to challenge for intentional grounding. You must not be able to do that. -
Eric Dickerson Article: Applicable to Bills Situation?
Watkins90 replied to yungmack's topic in The Stadium Wall Archives
Fisher was there long enough to deserve to be fired. McDermott hasn't even had one full season yet and we are sitting at 6-5, in the wild-card race, with a roster that is one of the worst in the NFL. You want to replace the coach that has gotten that much out of this little talent? I just don't see any parallels between the two teams because the Rams have a QB who is willing to throw the ball and make mistakes. -
Official fire Rick Dennison thread
Watkins90 replied to Buffalo Bills Fan's topic in The Stadium Wall Archives
Most teams run the ball when they are up two scores in the second half. Didn't everyone kill the Falcons last year for throwing too much in the second half of the Super Bowl which allowed the Pats time to get back in the game? I mean, we should probably throw a little more than we do when up by two scores, but that mostly just comes down to the offense being super obvious. LIke Dennison only throws the ball on third and long in the second half. It wouldn't be an issue if our rushing attack was better. While you might call it conservative, doesn't running the ball also wear down the defense? Aren't they trying to move the ball while also keep the clock running? I just don't by the assessment you are making. I'd like to see some other stats of other QBs, and how often they throw in the second half up two scores. -
Which is all the more reason why the offense needs to pick up the slack. That Jags defense also has a lot more talent than we do because they have picked at the top of the draft the last couple of years and signed good free agents. Trying to compare us to Jacksonville is stupid. Offense doesn’t score points, but it’s our defense that lost us games. Got it!!
-
The Saints had 17 first-half points to the Bills 3. The Jets had 10 points in the first half, to the Bills 7. You guys act like the game was already over before halftime, when each of those was well within reach. It wasn't until the second half when the defense started to get tired that things went south. In each of those games, the opposing team had the time of possession advantage. In fact, the Saints had double the time of possession. I'm not saying blame Tyrod for the defenses poor performance, but when people say "Tyrod didn't give up 47 points." I think that's a BS state because he was a major contributor to the Saints game.
-
Care to refute that Tyrod is as much to blame for a poor defensive performance as the actual defense. I think it is.
-
I honestly don't think the defense is that big of an issue. We have had success on defense in the first half, we have been getting blown out in the second half. You know why we get blown out in the second half? It is because our offense can't sustain drives to give our defense a rest, nor is it putting points on the board. When your down 30-3 midway through the third guys tend to just give up and want to stay healthy for another week. Had our offense done things against the Jets, Saints, and Chargers, I don't think you see our defense get gashed like it did. That's why I hate it when I hear people say, 'Well, Tyrod didn't give up 47 points, he didn't give up 6 rushing touchdowns.' Well, yeah he may not have been on the field, but his play was a big contributing factor. His inability to move the offense and go 3-and-out so much led to those things.
-
[Vague Title]I think what we have to realize
Watkins90 replied to Watkins90's topic in The Stadium Wall Archives
The media is taking the wrong approach. It is solely looking at cause-and-effect to drive its narrative. The Bills' run defense got worse when they traded Dareus and Jacksonville's got better. Cause-and-effect says trading Dareus was the wrong decision. What they fail to look at is what we were getting for the money we were paying him. While our poor run defense might be a cause of Dareus's trade, do we really want to pay someone $100 million to be in on less than 50 percent of snaps? Is that good economics. Like I said, if he goes on to be a HOF, it was still the right move for both us and him. He would never have done that while here based off of passing performance the last couple of years. I feel like he never wanted to be here, but we made him an offer he couldn't refuse, which is why he phoned it in once he got the contract. -
Is that what Beane and McDermott are doing isn't a new concept. Hell Carolina did it recently. While Gettleman may not have traded away high-priced talent, he didn't resign old veterans. Getting rid of Steve Smith Sr. was a very unpopular decision in Carolina, but Gettleman knew what he was doing. Now, it was a little easier for him because he didn't have to go out and find a franchise QB, because he already had one. But, I don't think you can really disagree with whatever moves Beane has made. Trading Watkins was unpopular, but if that second-round pick nets us a good player, no one is going to gripe. It is hard to look to the future because that is what we have been doing for so long, but we just gotta keep the faith. I know trading Dareus doesn't look like a smart decision, especially to the media. If Dareus ends up a HOF with Jacksonville, it was still the right call. The guy wasn't giving effort here and for the amount we were paying him, he needed to go. I know, I know, we are sick of "Trust the Process." But, that is all we can really do. Firing Beane and McDermott would do more harm at this point, than good. You think we would get the cream of the crop GM or Coach. Who would want to come here if they knew they could be fired if things don't look good 10 weeks into their stay here in Buffalo. "Trust the Process" it is all we have for the next couple of years. One thing is for sure though, this is going to be an interesting couple of years.
-
What was the purpose of drafting Peterman?
Watkins90 replied to Steptide's topic in The Stadium Wall Archives
Cheap backup QB, especially when you think your team is going to be trash. -
11-20: McDermott and Coordinator Pressers
Watkins90 replied to 26CornerBlitz's topic in The Stadium Wall Archives
Nice to see a fellow Bonnie, Shannon Shepherd, having a successful career. -
Just drafting a good QB might not be enough
Watkins90 replied to Big Turk's topic in The Stadium Wall Archives
You get the QB and then you place talent around him. You also do whatever you can to get that talent around him. Green Bay is a shining example of how you don't build a team around a QB. Ted Thompson is an awful GM because he really only builds his roster through the draft, he refuses to really sign free agents or make a big free agent signing splash. Hoem grown talent is great, but that needs to be complemented with good free agent signings, which Green Bay hasn't done. -
Sweet. My wife and I will definitely be there. We will bring some Doritos are something to chip in, and can also provide money for the food to whoever, as well!!!
-
Gameday Thread 1st Half Bills @ Chargers
Watkins90 replied to Chandler#81's topic in The Stadium Wall Archives
He wouldn't have three picks. He'd have more than three sacks and it''d be 10-0. At least with Peterman, we have the threat of a passing game. -
Maybe they are worried Peterman will win them some games and ruin the draft position.
-
No, it isn't. It would be stupid to dump and run. You have to give these two guys a chance to build a team. Let's give them two drafts to see what hey can build. We overachieved early in the season.
-
Gameday Thread Bills vs Saints 2nd Half
Watkins90 replied to Chandler#81's topic in The Stadium Wall Archives
Look at that, two step drop out of shotgun and then released and threw. Guy wasn't wide open, but threw it only where our guy could get it. -
Gameday Thread Bills vs Saints 2nd Half
Watkins90 replied to Chandler#81's topic in The Stadium Wall Archives
He'll come in and hand the ball off to Tolbert. Won't throw a single pass, you watch. -
Gameday Thread Bills vs Saints 2nd Half
Watkins90 replied to Chandler#81's topic in The Stadium Wall Archives
Why do we have a coach that is unwilling to put our backup QB in. I know people will be calling for Peterman to start if he scores two TDs in garbage time, but ****, let the kid get some game experience. It's clear Tyrod isn't the answer moving forward. He isn't willing to take chance, especially when we need too, to come back. -
A meet up at Als to caravan over?
-
Not if you took away Thursday night games in the process. It would make Monday night more meaningful.