teef

some my happiest times were when i lived in a tiny apartment in buffalo. it was almost a glorified studio. i never worried about a thing. oh man...this exactly where we're at. it ends up costing a lot to put on events like that. sure people bring stuff over to help, but the hosts always end up taking the hit. once the family knows the house works for larger events, you become the go to for every damn function and party under the sun. i do like having family and friends over, but i hate missing out. comparing it to a wedding is perfect. in my defense though, i enjoyed my wedding. everyone kept telling me i wouldn't have any fun at mine because it's just so busy. well...i spent about half of it shaking hands and saying hi. for the second half i said screw it, and got plastered with my friends. my wife had to send someone to come get me to cut the cake. she was not happy, but she knew what she was getting into. maybe i'll use that same strategy for thanksgiving.

at one point i loved thanksgiving...until we started hosting it. we bought our forever house a few years ago, and made sure it had enough room for holiday throwdowns. mistake numero uno. 45 people come over, eat our ****, drink my booze, and !@#$ my house up. i don't think i've actually eaten a full dinner in 3 years. i honestly just want to go out to eat at this point.

i think mack is from fla if i'm not mistaken. i don't think hometowns matter too much. it can help, but i think most of it has to do with money.

in what world is goff a much worse qb than tt? this is my point...some posters are trying far too hard to defend this trade for la.

i'm sure you have, and i'm sure you have a much better understanding on the rams offense, but i think people are trying to hard to plump up sammy's importance to that team. i agree that with having him on the field helps, but as others have mentioned, it's just not worth the 2nd pick and a player for a guy that's probably going to be a one year rental. if sammy is so important, do you think the rams production is going to fall off the side of the earth next year if he leaves? i certainly don't, although i could be wrong. if the bills made a similar move and traded a for a guy who has so little production, some of the same posters who are praising la would be destroying the bills. some people were so bent out of shape by the watkins trade, that no matter how bad it works out, they'll find a way to defend it.

And you really think this is in a large part due to Sammy presence?

I can't wait for the bills to trade a second round pick for a decoy. I can hardly contain myself.

but scott's post doesn't make this board any better in november. how does it help the board now?

i think it's nice that you guys are trying to explain things to scott.

maybe the entire team has mono. did you ever think of that op? now you seem like an inconsiderate turd.

i'd enjoy more racist emojis.

meh. i didn't expect playoffs this year, so whatever happens, happens. it's all about the future. future cakewalk bitches.

it looked like something was completely so out of sync, which hasn't been the case at all this year. the entire team was just a let down. i'm giving the staff the benefit of the doubt on this one, but sunday should be interesting.

happy birfday!

i'd assume so too. it would likely be someone who is good at growing, that provides pot to a smaller group for a decent price.

i'm at the point where anytime the bills win, i'm impressed.

this is exactly what i've heard as well dave. my wife works for the school system, so they're really pushing people to vote on the CC in fear that their pensions will be messed with. other than that, i have zero idea about the pros and cons. for the most part, i've seen the convention painted as a waste of money.

i just don't know what to think anymore. i mean...i know it's been said a million times this past week, but the jets game was such a shockingly bad performance that for the first time, i really questioned this staff. it happens. every team can have a stinker, but we as fans have seen those stinkers turn into two or three in a row. we'll see.

after the jets game, i really have no idea. it was such a gross loss, that i have no idea if it was an outlier, or has this team just hit its wall? as the majority of posters in this thread have mentioned, the saints game will give us a big heads up.

agreed. i certainly can't speak for everyone, but i don't ever think it was a question of talent or ability. i think sammy can put up monster numbers somewhere, but the trick is him finding that home. i just don't think the bills would ever have been that place. because there's been some early success, i think we forget that this staff has made decisions for the future. to get a second round pick for the guy may really help in the long run. this team isn't even close to being a final product yet.

Great post boatdrinks. Completely agree.

and i wouldn't be surprised if the 1 cb was on him, or even if he was double teamed on occasion. it's shocking that someone is using that as an argument.

so what if he's double teamed? you think he's so elite...should't he still be showing some numbers? i don't think i've once seen anyone call him a scrub on here. his problem is he was a me first player, (as he even admitted) and even then his value wasn't there. you know who's worth the money? productive players. sammy hasn't shown himself to be one. what's it going to take for people to realize that letting sammy go was likely a wise decision? will have have to be non-productive on his third team for people to actually clue in?

his injuries are still part of the problem. i don't care why he has a lack of targets or a lack of production. it's on sammy. he's even been arguably been put into a better situation this year, and he still can't get it done. i think he has it in him to be great, but at some point he needs to own this.

watkins was absolutely inconsistent. you mention dropping balls and running the wrong routes, but that's not what i'm referring too. i'm talking about straight up production, or lack there of from sammy. you want to blame in on the coaching? go right ahead, but sammy has been on two teams now, and has yet shown to be elite. at some point the excuses from posters have to stop. woods was a solid wr for the bills, but in no way should the bills have given him 8 mill a year. i appreciate what he's done for la, but no way. and what's with the "how many rams games have i watched"? enough with that nonsense. i don't need to see any to know that watkins has so far been a failure there. has woods be good...sure, but in my mind not 8 mill a year good. i'd much rather have benjamin for that money. i really don't think you even care about these specific players. you're still in that nonsense mode that the bills are letting these guys go because of money, when it's clearly not the entire story. at least you started bringing up gilmore as an example. he would have been a huge mistake for the money. keep letting your anger cloud the reality of what's happening. sammy's lack of production is no one's fault other than sammys. woods seems to be getting the ball fine enough. why can't watkins? you're elite.