teef

She’s a terrible person. She is currently being sued for slander, (it may not be that exactly) for calling out the president of a charter school as racist. I’ve heard the story second hand, but apparently the valedictorian of the class didn’t turn his speech in on time, so he wasn’t allowed to do it for graduation. The mayor turned it into race issue. She brought him to city hall to give his speech, and posted it all over social media. She then attacked the president, who lost his job as a result. He had a perfect record, and if I’m not mistaken, started the charter school. Even the student didn’t feel the principal deserved to lose his job. In all fairness I may not have the details correct, but we know someone related to the principal, and these were the bits I’ve heard. The lawsuit is public however, and was mentioned on the local news. Edit: the principal resigned as a result. Not fires.

T-bomb, you’re trying too hard again.

why don't you just come over?

you're only as old as you feel scotty!

just give us one nugget. ok...how about age. how old is scottlaw?

this is all very fair, and we will always be friends. yolo summed up my idea of what a homer is, but yours is so much nicer.

oh my. i didn't say gase was terrible or mcdermott was good. i just felt that comparing win percentages of a coach that was beginning the third year of a rebuild to a coach that had his chance, coached multiple year and failed, wasn't correct or honest. i guess you just can't understand that. since you have no argument and are coming off looking a bit foolish, you fall back on calling people homers, and nonsense comments that were never actually said. you easily prove my point. edit: to be fair, i'm not even saying gase is a bad coach. he may do well and you may be right. i just was shocked that you think comparing win percentages is an intelligent, reasonable way of comparing the two. it's not, and either you don't understand that, or you just can't admit you look a bit foolish after all of this.

ah...calling someone a homer. you don't even know my stance on this team yet you call out homer. it's so hard to take someone seriously when they do that. dave explained why your take was off, and i think you may have gotten it a bit. it's amazing, you say you don't irrationally defend every bills move, yet you irrationally build up everyone that isn't on the bills. to compare wins right now is just stupid, yet you insist on it. you defend gase because of the miami roster and having bad qbs , even though it was partly his doing, yet you trash mcd and bean for tearing down ours. you refuse to apply the same logic to both arguments. i just don't think you have the ability to understand what people are calling you out on.

you don't ignore the next two years, but i wouldn't think of it as the future. they should have darnold for a long time, so i can't imagine there's enormous pressure to win next year. (i get that there's always pressure to win). i'm not fired up at all. i'm just shocked you can't understand what posters are trying to explain. it's ok. you be you.

if this is the case, it's an even worse hire than i thought. they should be planning for the future, and not worrying about a year or two more of brady.

you're trying to prove gase isn't terrible by comparing wins or win percentages with mcd. that's whats terrible. you also blast our staff for tearing down this roster, then use roster as an excuse for why gase wasn't better. there was a number of posters that showed you why your logic is completely faulty. it's up to you weather or not you want to process it. if you're going to argue something, at least make sense.

it's shocking isn't it?

i want to, but i don't know enough about you. what do you do for a living? i just want to know that man that is scott.

we don't know what our staff is yet. i get not liking them, but trying to prove something by comparing winning percentage isn't accurate. do you understand why?

again, do you not see the flaw in comparing records at this point? i'm sure you do, yet it's kinda your thing. you spend a lot of time being upset at posters for how they react to players once the left the bills, yet you take a lot of opportunities to bash our own staff. if you don't love mcd, i get it, but comparing records the way you are is just wrong.

really? do you not realize the flaw with this argument?

what's you deal scott? married? any kids? i need to know more about what make you tick.

i appreciate you as a poster. your opinions are unique.

as a fan, i've never been nervous for the bills to go against a gase led team. i can't imagine this changes. scott talk!

I suggested we sit on milk crates. The frills take away from the game.

let's just say the neighborhood association asked me to stop.

i can only say 50/50 at this point. i need to see what happens this off season. this is a big year for that tandem.

this sounds just awful.

thank you!

no specific fantasy. i just like to show my hand and see where the chips fall.