Jump to content

JohnBonhamRocks

Community Member
  • Posts

    4,354
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by JohnBonhamRocks

  1. Trades: - 28 & 144 to SF for 31 & 63 - 63 & 163 to ARI for 66 & 104 - 104, 160, & 204 to GB for 91 - 128, 133, & 200 to CIN for 115 & 149 31. Xavier Worthy - WR - Texas 60. Adisa Isaac - DE - Penn State 66. Ja’Lynn Polk - WR - Washington 91. Michael Hall, Jr. - DT - Ohio State 115. Dadrion Taylor-Demerson - S - Texas Tech 149. Javon Baker - WR - UCF 248. Kimani Vidal - HB - Troy Only regret is not adding to the OL. Otherwise, WR room is stocked, some nice pieces added to the DL, and we get decent prospects at S and HB.
  2. Not sure Baker makes it to the 4th round, but I would be very happy with a Worthy/Baker double-dip.
  3. I think I went to high school with him and Mike Wazowski
  4. Agreed. I think they want a WR room full of guys who can line up anywhere.
  5. First thought: Dude is going to have neck problems using a football pillow like that. Second thought: Thank goodness they did not use this pose for Reid and his nuggies.
  6. The cap does not seem to be the only factor that went into parting ways with Diggs imho
  7. Hope not especially if they go the way of other teams recently who look like they play in arena football leagues. I know Zubaz won’t happen but hey a fan can dream and at least they would be unique.
  8. Wishlist in order: 1. Red 90s helmets 2. White standing buffalo 3. Dare I suggest… something zubaz?
  9. Their true needs appear to be WR, DE, and S. Likeliest imho is a WR in round one after a modest trade up or at 28, then a DE or BPA at 60, before addressing S in round 4. Would not mind a S like Bullard if there at 60 and then a DE like Kamara if there in round 4. But who knows, maybe Beane has that Tre White money coming in June reserved for a vet S or DE with whom he already has a handshake deal…
  10. Probably brought on to help eat all that Diggs cap space
  11. So many takes, so little time. The trade is a good move overall and netted good return given the contract situation, the unsettled relationship, and compared with other recent trades of WRs around the league. The bad move was the extension that made this trade of an albatross necessary. Rather Beane grab a lifeboat than go down with the ship. Still, we are not rebuilding, just being smart and objective about bad contracts. Diggs gave us some great entertainment and production, but the sun is setting on his career. The Bills showed last season down the stretch that he is replaceable. I wonder how little value we could give up to get in position for one of the big 3 WRs in this draft. Also, yes, the money freed up next year can be used for a new deal if we were to trade for a WR - just need to structure the hits that way.
  12. Diggs apparently was not a certain thing
  13. Using ProFootballNetwork’s Mock Draft Simulator: 28. Xavier Worthy - WR - Texas *traded back from 60 to 80 and netted 97* 80. Javon Bullard - S - Georgia 97. DeWayne Carter - DT - Duke 128. Javon Baker - WR - UCF 133. Tanor Bortolini - OL - Wisconsin 144. Cedric Johnson - DL - Ole Miss 160. Isaiah Davis - HB - South Dakota State 163. M.J. Devonshire - CB - Pittsburgh 189. Trey Taylor - S - Air Force 200. Mohamed Kamara - DL - Colorado 204. Jordan Whittington - WR - Texas 248. Jaden Crumedy - DT - Mississippi State
  14. Yes, I see it as likely that the Bills take one at 28 or 60 (or one of our top two picks if we trade) and another at the end of round 4.
  15. I think it affects our roster building more for bottom end types than returners. By that I mean likely more focus on big uglies than track stars because sprinting down field was taken out of the equation.
  16. If my biggest gripe with a mock draft is using “Jnr” and “Snr” instead of “Jr” and “Sr”, then you did a good job. Would absolutely hate Worthy to Miami.
  17. Definitely not top end size but his speed and quickness I think are top end.
  18. Which prospects do you think fall under that umbrella?
×
×
  • Create New...