GoBills808

You're right. It's way more reasonable to care about what other people think about what DO thinks.

Posted what like 25 times in this thread since it opened a couple hrs ago

$1k says Allen best ANY/A in the division by end of regular season if you aren’t accepting don’t @me

I say Allen will blow all other AFC quarterbacks out of the water by pretty much whatever metric you want to use next season and I guarantee NOBODY chirping here will take that bet

You think so too?

You're good w/Allen ranked 3rd QB in the division?

bUt LoOk aT hOw ThAt HoRsE iS wEaViNG

God forbid Bills fans prefer their QB to the Dolphins' small rookie w/a broken hip

college stats lol

Well ok then.

He signed for what was a completely reasonable ask- more APY than Matt Ryan who happened to play for a divisional rival. The original question was someone asking if anyone could think of a QB who gave his team a discount on a second contract and that's Newton. Gettleman's said it, Panthers fans acknowledge it also.

lmfao he has two years of professional tape to go on wtf is this

‘Bottom third QB’ according to what?

You don't have to agree, he was the latest big name free agent QB and didn't get paid like one. If you don't cal that a hometown discount I don't know what to tell you.

Panthers fans will tell you he wanted to stay in Carolina and took the deal they offered when he could have made more elsewhere, yes.

He came off a year he was injured a bunch and broke his back in a car wreck, yes. But he gave the Panthers a deal and the proof is how he went out and put together an MVP season immediately after getting paid when he could have taken more elsewhere.

Cam Newton

Darnold has alternated between bad and good, but when he plays well he has shown a level Allen hasn't reached yet as a passer. Needs to limit the back breaking INT tho to really justify separating the two by a meaningful stretch.

Lmfao ok

I trust Beane and McDermott to value him correctly

He literally tried to correct my saying Rodgers was first by saying he was second. I don't know how I can spell this out any clearer.

No, I’m not. Nobody was talking about performance.

Again: no, you weren't. You thought you were supporting the idea that 'inaccurate' QBs face an inordinately high amount of man coverage and used an unrelated graphic as proof. That's why you said Rodgers was second when he's quite clearly first. I simply provided you the correct data.

Regarding your first bolded: no. You are looking at the chart that gives EPA differential on zone/man. Completely unrelated. We were talking about how often QBs face man vs zone and how that correlates to their supposed 'accuracy'. That's this chart: And as to your second bolded...considering that was the entire point of the conversation I would have just spared myself the time, personally. Nobody was talking about performance against zone or man coverage.

Maybe just stop typing for a bit