Jump to content

GoBills808

Community Member
  • Posts

    17,930
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by GoBills808

  1. Darnold has alternated between bad and good, but when he plays well he has shown a level Allen hasn't reached yet as a passer. Needs to limit the back breaking INT tho to really justify separating the two by a meaningful stretch.
  2. I trust Beane and McDermott to value him correctly
  3. He literally tried to correct my saying Rodgers was first by saying he was second. I don't know how I can spell this out any clearer.
  4. No, I’m not. Nobody was talking about performance.
  5. Again: no, you weren't. You thought you were supporting the idea that 'inaccurate' QBs face an inordinately high amount of man coverage and used an unrelated graphic as proof. That's why you said Rodgers was second when he's quite clearly first. I simply provided you the correct data.
  6. Regarding your first bolded: no. You are looking at the chart that gives EPA differential on zone/man. Completely unrelated. We were talking about how often QBs face man vs zone and how that correlates to their supposed 'accuracy'. That's this chart: And as to your second bolded...considering that was the entire point of the conversation I would have just spared myself the time, personally. Nobody was talking about performance against zone or man coverage.
  7. Maybe just stop typing for a bit
  8. lmfao the top guy on the chart is Aaron Rodgers and PFF fantasy football column would not be my go-to reference but hey
  9. Have you looked at our drafts w/the new FO versus the Whaley years? That alone should tell you the bolded is wrong.
  10. There are so many other factors that go into what coverage a secondary will line up in I don't even feel like responding but oh well Go find some stats that show a correlation between %man coverage and QB 'accuracy' The reason Newton and the Panthers saw a ton of man is just as likely because their wideouts were some combination of Funchess, Brenton Bersin, Philly Brown, and Kaelin Clay lmfao
  11. Ok I understand you I think the Bills haven't had a wideout like Diggs before and we've collectively forgotten how a guy like him can improve an offense. If he is running that route instead of Brown it's either a TD or more likely the Ravens aren't in Cover0 because with Diggs on the field you can expect him to win and just throw him open for a TD when you see that look
  12. Mmm you don't beat cover0 by throwing 'accurate passes in tight windows' The whole concept of cover0 is understanding leverage...there are no tight windows, just reading routes develop and throwing angles On that last play, Allen delivered the correct ball against that defense to the correct target who was so badly outmatched physically against his defender he couldn't even get a hand on it. And iirc he threw another one vs same defense to Beasley who dropped it, our wideouts got beat up that game
  13. Last play of the game he beat Cover0 which would have been the tying score but Brown couldn't win against Marcus Peters
  14. They could have not left a rookie TE to block 1v1 vs Matthew Judon
  15. Yawn nothing ever new from you
  16. This game was lost on dropped passes
  17. He could have paralyzed him and that’s not hyperbole
  18. Gotcha, yes I thought you were talking about Washington
  19. Yeah and the Super Bowl champion Minnesota Vikings are looking like geniuses too.
×
×
  • Create New...