GoBills808

Lines been moving the other way just fyi

Can't wait to meet these millions of intelligent, critically thinking NFL fans who believe in slippery slope fallacies.

Says the guy with 50 posts in the thread about an innocuous endzone slogan.

Let's examine that 'bias'. Ravens had 18 first downs, Bills had 16. Each team had one turnover. Ravens won the yardage battle by 48 yards and the TOP by two minutes and 49 seconds. You think the difference in the game was 'ridiculously questionable calls' in the Bills' favor without mentioning the awful drops by our pass catchers and the fact that the 25% of the Ravens yards (not to mention the difference in the final score) came from a single very uncharacteristic busted coverage. You seem very resistant to the idea that the Bills are a good football team for some reason.

If we beat the Ravens last season, we likely play starters vs Jets and end up 12-4. Ravens would be 13-3. Granted that is just what if, but realistically the Bills won as many playoff games last season as did the Ravens. So I think it would be a fair question.

Not the point. The article is about the team's weakest link in the context of the entire squad. If we had beaten the Ravens Barnwell would be wondering whether Jackson was a good enough passer to beat the Bills.

Well yes, as we played the Ravens last year and the game came down to the last play. I'd call that competitive.

75% Singletary

Always rooting for Fitz

13 pages on kickers smdh

I don't blame you, I wouldn't have that conversation either.

I adhere to the idea that people aren't only their beliefs. We don't have to agree on everything (or anything) to understand we're all in this together.

I think you might be surprised to find common ground provided you're willing to dig deep enough.

Is intentional homicide substantially different from murder? Not familiar with Wisconsin statute tbh

For murder one iirc

That’s how it feels to be a minority.

Lmao ok guy Your contribution to this thread was that Kenny Smith should ‘do his job’ and my post is the ridiculous one. Terrific.

We’ll just leave it at your bar for what should necessitate the police shooting someone is a lot lower than mine.

I reiterate my earlier position- let’s just kill all criminals indiscriminately. Starting with people who fail to signal switching lanes. Sound good?

I understand you’re not directly comparing your tennis audience to a national TV broadcast, but the idea that the two have any relation to each other in terms of impact or consequence for saying the wrong thing is totally ridiculous.

Again: it's a very specific viewpoint that can argue another black person shot by law enforcement isn't shocking or cause to 'lose one's poise'.

So in essence, you sanction state sponsored executions of citizens without due process when circumstances as determined by the executioners deem it necessary.

The kind of grace under pressure and eloquence you are suggesting a TV personality adopt, within the confines of his announcing gig, is at best unrealistic and at worst suggestive as evidenced by your initial musing on whether his actions should constitute a firing.

It's a pretty tall ask that someone reasonably 'make their case' while still doing their job, especially if (as I suspect) you've never been privy to the kind of helplessness one might feel under such circumstances.

There's no response that would satisfy him. It's why posting video without having to explain your point of view isn't considered productive dialogue.