GoBills808

There’s no research suggesting pit bull types are more prone to getting ‘triggered’ and attacking a human than other breeds of dog.

Maybe you should have been. A human can do a lot more damage than a dog.

I hate to keep repeating myself but it really sounds like the majority of people’s issues lie with the owners rather than the dog.

Pit bulls are the great whites of the canine world.

Probably the right spot but Slay not Gilmore lol...Gilmore is good but not top 3. Below average in run support from day 1.

‘Habitual line-stepper’ is a Charlie Murphy/Dave Chappelle reference so I’m guessing this new guy is in his early 30s. Also, Rodak was a self-admitted troll so good riddance imo.

Not a whole bunch when you consider ‘pit bull’ encompasses a lot of different breeds of dog (meaning there are a ton of dogs that get thrown into the pit bull category, and that’s without mentioning how popular ‘pit bulls’ are in general ie there are a LOT of em in the US), whereas say a Rottweiler is a very specific (and not nearly as common) breed. Statistics, guys.

5k is like my buyin...so I ain’t doing nothing with it except putting it into another card game next week. If I run it up to 20 then we can talk

Relax chief, it was probably insured. And if it wasn’t he deserves every bit of ridicule.

Because once Mahomes’ deal is up nobody will be able to afford any quarterback anymore ever.

No doubt they can do more damage than your average dog my dude. I’m more disputing the idea that the breed is disproportionately aggressive toward humans. If you own a big dog you need to be aware they can hurt someone much more severely than a smaller breed and train it accordingly. Pit bulls and their associated mixes were originally bred for fighting, they have really strong muscles around the jaw which is they’re popular hunting dogs here...they ‘lock’ and it’s damn near impossible to shake them loose so they can pin hogs down. I’ve owned a few of them over the years, they’re absolutely more dangerous physically than your average poorly trained canine.

If there are any geneticists in the audience we could get a better answer, but I have a hard time believing any domesticated species bred and cross bred as intensively as dogs have been retain within certain breeds a large enough variant to account for the kind of behavioral traits they're accused of having. Bad owners seem like the way more likely answer imo. Dogs are a human invention. We've been manipulating their genetics for thousands of years to our mutual benefits...'pit bulls' are just another relatively modern crossbreed, it doesn't stand to reason that they would be particularly aggressive toward humans. In fact the species most likely to bite humans according to this study https://www.avma.org/KB/Resources/LiteratureReviews/Pages/The-Role-of-Breed-in-Dog-Bite-Risk-and-Prevention.aspx were the small/toy breeds. My take on dangerous pit bulls (or any such breed/crossbreed so characterized) is stigmatization based on bad owners, media coverage, and the popularity of the breed at any given time ie how many of them are being raised (more dogs of one sort=more bites proportionally)

Or maybe it tells you that people who go for pit bulls are often bad owners.

Statistics...crap owners tend to go for certain breeds, hence the stigma around pit bulls, rotweilers, dobermans etc. Has very little to do with genetics imo.

Impossible everybody loves mee

Love Steve Smith, they don’t make em like him anymore

INJECT THIS COMMENT STR8 INTO MY VEINS

Bro please don't say that, I got a semi just skimming these last few pages

He was garbage the whole game. Racked up stats when it was out of reach. It was one of the worst performances by a QB I’ve ever seen and I’ve seen some bad ones. He looked clueless as did their whole offense. Seriously, rewatch it. They were running one-read high school concepts and while some of that was the Chargers defense it was also 100% a testament to how bad Jackson was.

Well done 21

You can’t just use those stats though, that was the definition of garbage time. Jackson cost them that game 100%. He was awful when it mattered. Ravens defense was the only reason that game was close enough for him to get some positive statistics when it was out of their reach...I mean their first half possessions went punt fumble punt punt INT punt. He was laughably bad that game.

That's that dude who benches 400lbs but can't turn his head w/out getting whiplash

Yeh real men used to be unable to adapt and loved complaining on the internet.

If you don’t skin your dead family members and use their hides as belts and leather goods you are for sure a ****.

If you watch Jackson play it’s pretty obvious how limited his game is.