BuffaloHokie13

2-6 is the official report. I'll go with that.

I hate to tell you guys this, but we aren't going to win another game this year... Also, the Jets are going to lose 2 games so badly that they forfeit their 2 current wins.

Zay, Holmes, Tate, Clay, Split Thomas out, PS (Reilly/Dupre), Webb That feels most like what we'll do in my opinion.

I usually mute the TV, put on a Green Day song, and hope some of the lyrics sync up with his mouth movements.

Rumblings or just musings?

Along that line of thinking, though I don't really see a trade coming Travis Benjamin? Donte Moncrief? Brandon LaFell? <- Carolina Connection, but unlikely this week since we play them Sterling Shepard? Kendall Wright/Deonte Thompson?

and the Chargers handed 4 wins to their opponents, we've only lost 1.

It isn't, but you've developed a reputation for yourself. You like to downplay or completely ignore things that the QB does do well while highlighting anything that paints him in a negative light. I've yet to see you post anything remotely close to that about our defense, let alone in the volume you do with Tyrod. You can't have a posting history like that and then be upset when people base your motives on that history. Example from a thread earlier today that I found funny: Stats are USELESS... *insert negative stat about TT*

Jarvis Landry and Brandon Marshall

I do try to operate within reality

I'd love to see us bring in my guy Eddie Royal for spot duty, if he wants to play that is.

Unexpected. Bringing up Reilly?

To that point, no 3-1 (or better) team other than us has an opponent win% over .500 (except Washington if they upset KC tonight).

Of the 3-1 (and potential 3-1+) teams, we have faced the highest opponent W/L so far. PIT: 5-11 DEN: 7-9 PHI: 6-10 DET: 7-9 GB: 7-9 CAR: 7-9 RAMS: 5-10 (Washington's MNF Result to determine last tick) BUF: 11-5 Potential 3-1+ teams: WAS: 11-4 - If Washington wins they will be tied with us as KC would have to lose for Washington to be 3-1 KC: 7-8

I was channeling college me. I'm at work and not drinking, sadly.

I'm 4 shots of SoCo in and I still disagree...

I understand that there is plenty of season left, but let's not act like the victories we have are hollow. First 'It was just the Jets'. Then we couldn't even muster a TD against the Panthers. Then Siemian had an uncharacteristic bad day and we benefited from referee calls, 'a gift', but we'll see who we really are next week on the road against Atlanta. Now we beat Atlanta and it's 'Well we've started well before, the real tests are in November/December'. No. Enough is enough. The Buffalo Bills are a good football team that can compete with anyone this year. It's okay to admit that.

And here I figured playing 3 of the past 4 Super Bowl participants in a row, with 2 on the road, was a real test.

Interesting take. Isn't it the 'Tyrod lovers' who claimed we could win with Tyrod if the D played better? The Bills are finally looking and playing like what we were promised at the beginning of 2015!

Not a Bills team, but 2012-2015 Seahawks. Great D kept them in every game despite mediocre production on O.

Last Season, not last week.

One thing that gives this start some validity is that 3 of the teams we played were participants in the last 2 Super Bowls.

That what if has nothing to do with Tyrod's play, which was his point.

Beathard era begins in SF?!? Nevermind... Hoyer's okay. Good for him.

I've been very impressed by his in game adjustments