TPS

Top 3 FA needs before the draft: cb1, wlb and wr2.

Thoughts and prayers ng.

As I learn more about the prospects, my view is to pick (listed in order) one of Hooker/Adams, Foster, or Solomon at 10, and if none are available try to trade back. All of course will depend on what happens in FA. While I'm certain they will add a WR and LB in FA (I'm assuming TT is back), they really need a young stud at S. Graham is aging and AW's future is up in the air. If neither is available, then Foster, who seems the speedy type of LB that SM likes. Solomon may be the most controversial on my list. You can never have enough pass rushers, and this guy wreaks havoc from all over the line. I'm torn on the CB position. I don't think Gilmore will return. I could add "the best CB" on my list, but it seems it's a very good year, and there will be a lot of options at the 45th pick. And, if the Bills do not replace Gilmore in FA, then they will have to take a CB with one of the first 2 picks.

Didn't we already have this conversation with a poll?

As long as the Bills get a #2 WR, WLB, and CB in FA (whether that's retaining Gilmore or not), then I'd be OK with OJ at 10. Having 2WR and 2TE like Clay and OJ would make for a very difficult to defend offense. The only negative I've read about him is his desire, which is certainly a red flag.

yes, you seem to have a Butt obsession...:-)

he was an RFA, and they gave him the min tender which was close to $1.7 nil. The bills couldn't match NE's offer given their cap situation. While not close in $s, it's not unlike what the bills did to Miami with clay.

Spend the money on bob woods and draft one of Williams/Davis, and weakness becomes a strength.

OP's post is an F, unless that last sentence was intentional--nice pun.

not necessarily old friends, but people you are familiar with, and know you also get/got along with. If you're going to be spending a lot of time with someone, you don't want some !@#$....

yes, several articles posted here have connected that dot (the Baltimore years) already. Provides another thread to either support or bash Taylor though...

The only team you see consistently call a qb sneak is New England. I don't get why other teams don't utilize it?

Would like to see the Bills pick up a TE in the draft.. apparently, it's a good year. http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap3000000776730/article/mayock-2017-nfl-draft-te-class-might-be-best-ive-seen

That crappy bob woods looked pretty good against Seattle

i think what he is alluding to is that if you can pull, then you sure as hell ought to be able to step right or left!

I'm going to judge McDermott on whether he too can win the offseason. No one wins an offseason like Rex, so I will be watching...

my question was for obm who thinks they are not agile enough to zone block. I think they are for precisely your point. you don't think wood and Miller are agile enough to zone block?

excluding RT, who is not agile enough to zone block?

yes, it was a joke.

yes, Rex had a playoff roster handed to him. Wonder if he was a jets plant...? 🙁

You have to be strategic in who your retain. Do you think letting Levitre and Byrd go were bad decisions? Again, look at all teams, and you'll find about 25 players +/- 3 who make > $1 million. That means you have to rely on your rookies and cheap vets to fill in the rest of the 53.

I heard Henderson was going to the Jags...

No team has an unlimited budget. They all rely on their draft picks to come in and play. This will be their second years, so the baptism is over, and Shaq will be healthy. From what I read about Washington last year, he fits the more attacking D that SM runs too. If they bring back Lorax, that will give them some veteran insurance, but I'm sure they'll bring in another body to compete at DE.

Having just seen the Bills' tweet again, it made me curious...I don't recall seeing a tweet That starts with "We've" before, it's usually "The Bills". Not sure if I'm correct or if it means anything, but found it curious.

that's why you bring in cheap vets like they did last year. no team's draft picks provide guarantees, so that's not really an argument.