Manther

Ok, so, those two may fit the BILL for a potential #1 or #2 WR. Hopefully one of them are there when we pick. I would like us to go BPA of the following positions......OT, G, WR, CB. The two WR's spoken of are intriguing being... Deon Cain WR Clemson 6'2 202, 4.43 40, 33.5 vert (5.86 grade) Equanimeous St. Brown WR Notre Dame 6'5 214, 4.48 40 (5.69 grade) Go Bills!!

You are correct, he has no stats or pieces of info at all that shows he is worth it. Please, be reasonable.

He would be one of the three that may fit that description. Nice looking player. That sounds like a perfect shot with a 4th rounder! That would be a good option I would be interested in tomorrow. But, it sounds like he isn't going to make it to us?!

They could possibly get that guy through the offseason with cuts, but, I don't think that WR would be an upgrade with what we have currently. But, hopefully something good happens with cuts where someone fits in well. Just not likely to be a #1 or #2.

I personally think we need a #1 or #2. Something we probably address next year. Hopefully Benjamin stays healthy this year, performs and resigns. Lots of "IFs". So, depending on that we need one or two top #2 WR's. That is my thought. I would think the Bills would have a similar thought process. Even if Zay ends up working out and doing well it seems he will be a slot guy. The rest of our WR's are WR's that can fill in or #4 or #5 and can fill in the slot or even #1 or #2 for a game of two a year (in a pinch). I think this is a position that may be left as is and not improved through the rest of the offseason. Go Bills! IF there is no high upside WR I would prefer we address the Oline. Have Allen sit for the year and have him grow with a new WR next year. Just a couple thoughts.

Totally agree! I think we could still get a good OT AND G!

I would be interested in a QB if the FO office think the QB is better than Peterman. If not, no worries. So, I guess if they have one of those 2nd tier QBs graded high I would be okay with taking one. Based on all teams passing on the QB's remaining I would think that none of them have good odds to make it in the NFL.

I don't know much about Brown, but, I think if we add a WR in the draft they need to be capable or being a #1 or #2 WR. Not a slot WR. Otherwise address another position. I don't feel the need to load up #3-#6 WR's. Those WR's can be found almost anywhere. No track stars or pure burners. JMO

That's positive. I don't think EJ Manuel or JP Losman did very well on the Wonderlic. And, those were the last two QB's we took in the 1st round. So, we have that going for us...which is nice.

1. OT 2. CB 3. OG 4. WR, DE or TE (but, I don’t think we can get the caliber we need at these positions this late in the draft. Need a difference playmaker not a JAG) 5. LB

I would be if I were them. But, it could pay off! I just don’t see the value in a RB at #2. Two main reasons... 1. When else can the New York Football Giants get a QB that high in the draft. 2. The cap investment vs other positions that high in the draft. I think most of the time a top 5 pick should be a QB, LT, DE and maybe a MLB (3 down that can get to the QB). I don’t like CB there either like the Browns did. But, Barkley may be the exception?!

Totally! Totally!!

Maybe we can grab Hurst in the 4th or 5th. 5th would be crazy like Bob Woods!

Haha, well played!

Yep! And, then some more!

Agreed!

Totally great!

That was awesome!

Maybe, maybe not. I personally don’t think he would have been there at #12. And, if you have one guy above the others you don’t chance it.

I want Hurst too. Fingers crossed, it’s getting close to possible.

I was surprised they didn’t get a QB in round 1 too. I will be shocked if they leave the draft without a QB at all!

Funny like a clown

Well, if Dickie Dunn wrote it, it must be true

A couple thoughts.... - I am pleased with the draft - I don’t like that are FO has traded up 4 times in the first two rounds the last two years. I don’t dislike the trades separately. But, for a long term successful plan trading up frequently isn’t good - I don’t agree when folks say we need a strong armed QB because of the weather. How many games are in bad weather a year and how many teams have the same amount of bad weather games

I think that is a good thing. Darnold was the one QB I didn't want. I don't think he will fix his turnovers. I also think Ryan Tannehill is not a good QB. So, I am excited the Jets have Darnold and the Fish still have Tannehill. Good for us, I think and hope!