Jump to content

34-78-83

Community Member
  • Posts

    6,289
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by 34-78-83

  1. That's one of the most wrong opinions I've read all day. B)
  2. Ooh Ooh! Should I start a look at me post to get some props for seeing what big Mike would be with some good tutulage, and seeing him up closer than atleast 90% of this board? Naw!
  3. I don't really see us making the playoffs , but I am- 1) very pleased with the team's progress after an 0-4 start and possible 9-7(atleast) record and.... 2) Still hopeful as we are not mathematically eliminated.
  4. The Phins used zero 9 man fronts yesterday, and had an eight man front MAYBE once or twice in the entire game. Know what you are talking about before you say it, it usually helps. And BTW, I think we DID make them pay with the passing game yesterday, if only exemplified by the 2 Evans td's.
  5. Sorry guys, I took option 1 as a joke (I thought the thread was meaningless enough to do so....) Am I supposed to be scared now stevestojan?
  6. All I can say is..... Damn we need a kicker!
  7. He was trying to stay upright in the pile to push for an extra yard or two. Jason Taylor ripped it out while Willis had his legs tied up by other defenders.
  8. It was close enough as to where it would have been the right thing to do just to fall on it. Nate has a "gunslinger's mentality", and while that frustrates us from time to time he makes plays because of it too...
  9. I'd buy every one of those. Interestingly, we are seeing some tendancies we haven't seen since the early nineties...
  10. And the Pats keep a rollin' along. Man, you're team is going to be tough to catch for atleast a few years to come.
  11. 49ers, in I think the mid to late eighties...
  12. Ice,Ice, Dante!..... Ice,Ice, Dante!.......
  13. The one-handed catch was amazing! The football speed, route percision, and maturity he has at this stage is what is most impressive. He really takes in everything he is taught. And what a better Wr to show him the ropes than EM?
  14. Ice , you know you just said that to get these folks riled up! Stop and resist the temptation. If you honestly feel that way about this outing you really should start questioning what you are seeing on the field.
  15. evans is definitely better than Peerless, but don't be suckered into believing Moulds isn't drawing the best cover men and double-teams.
  16. I think he was kidding
  17. I hope he sucks like this for the restof the season!
  18. I don't think 6 injuries is going to help very much
  19. Let's not forget too soon that in 1991, Thurman was the most feared double threat in the entire NFL
  20. Tell those people that something has come up! and Pronto!
  21. He certainly does not "suck" and everyone (well everyone else I guess) knows it. He is just not a complete back. The Bills have found their complete back in Willis. Though the exaggerations that persist here regarding TH by you and VA are bordering on absurdity. It would be one thing if you guys were calling him an average back , fine whatever, but the "no effort" , "bag of sh--", "he sucks" and the ever so popular and false "he's pouting in the locker room" comments only make you guys look like ICE in spite of the otherwise good knowledge of the game I know you guys have. It has been asked here before, but why does it always have to be Player A is god and his counterpart player B is a piece of sh-- ? Was it Flutie/Johnson that did this? I will never understand how a Bills fan cannot even in some small way support a guy that busted his ass the whole time while here and improved every season he was here , especially in such a lost season of misery like 2003. The are LB's strewn about the league who have testified to his positive abilities and they should not be ignored. So he was not the next great Bills Rb, get over it.
  22. You are going WAY out on a limb there with your personal interpretation of what Donahoe stated about mental toughness, but that's fine it's your opinion and can't be disputed any more than my opinion. Relinquishing a lead on a game ending drive very often DOES have a lot to do with an offense's production throughout said game. Constant three and outs generate both fatigue and a natural human reaction by defenders to think that "I need to make a big play here to change the game" when they should be focussing on their role as a component of the defensive scheme. I think that happened a lot under GW. If you remember in the KC game and NE game this year the Defense played much better early than later although you are right that they didn't play particularly well in either overall. I really do understand what your point was, and it certainly has some credibility but I just don't believe it's as cut and dry as you made it out to be. Along with that, I've got a real with anyone who would consider a defense with TKO, Fletcher, Milloy, PW, and Schobel as it's foundation lacking in heart.
×
×
  • Create New...