Jump to content

34-78-83

Community Member
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    6,181

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Everything posted by 34-78-83

  1. 34-78-83
    Lol!
  2. 34-78-83
    As if they needed that BS friggin call! What interference?
  3. 34-78-83
    They proved twice on the last series by the Pats that that approach doesn't work either. Posey was not even in the lineup on most of the 3rd and long early blitz plays. Also one of the "blitz" plays was 3 Down linemen only , so not really a "blitz".
  4. 34-78-83
    get 6 on this drive or the Game's over... .............. Game over
  5. 34-78-83
    Agreed. Drew has been bad in this game. The defense has been worse
  6. 34-78-83
    There, 3rd and 7....no blitz....First down.
  7. 34-78-83
    We've already abandoned the run and smashmouth approach early in the 2nd quarter. A win is simply no longer even a remote possibility unless we get back to it.
  8. 34-78-83
    Simon I know what you're saying but against Brady and tha Pat's offense it can be equally as risky to not put any pressure at all on him and allow him to pick you apart. Our D simply must adjust, but I don't think it's as cut and dry as you're making it. Reese is Reese and can only be hidden so well.
  9. 34-78-83
    Yeah and they just ignored 2 blatant holds by the Pats on Dillon's long run...
  10. 34-78-83
    Just unreal! Why do the supposed CHAMPS need a sudden change of rule interpretation that NEVER gets called in ANY other game? This is just blatant cheating, I'm sorry. I hate to make excuses, but this is ridiculous!
  11. 34-78-83
    I'm with you on this one ICE.
  12. 34-78-83
    As far as I can recall, every team that has beaten the Pats over the past 3years has beaten them with a smash-mouth, beyond stubborn, running approach. It usually takes until some point in the 4th quarter til you really begin to wear on them and the philosophy truly kicks in. Another big key is running on downs like 3rd and 4 or 5. That said, I would agree that in play-action type situations we need to take advantage of their injuries at corner (but only then).
  13. 34-78-83
    That is a mystery I've been trying to figure out for 4 years.
  14. 34-78-83
    I Think I've found my home
  15. 34-78-83
    I believe you belong in a category all your own ICE #5- The Eternally negative filp-flopping thoughtful optimists
  16. 34-78-83
    More Cowbell
  17. 34-78-83
    Of course it makes sense. Every game they have lost in the past three years they have been "out-physicalled" in. Every single one of them. Your team is great but they do NOT have answers for every possible scenario as you seem to think they do. If you expect reasonable answers here you must be objective about your own team.
  18. 34-78-83
    Certainly Can, but probably won't. I just think their big game experience, schemes, and the home field edge will make things a little too difficult for the Bills to overcome. I hope I am pleasantly surprised and wrong about this....
  19. 34-78-83
    Eyedog I agree completely earlier post
  20. 34-78-83
    Man if that's a butterface, I'd like to see your wife/girlfriend
  21. 34-78-83
    I think they're going to try that formation as well, and it sucks because they're quite good at executing within that personell grouping. The only way to get them out of that formation would be to get upfield in a hurry with our DT's and/or any other middle pressure from blitzing. Also, dropping an occasional D-lineman into the passing lane, while substitute rushing a LB works well too.
  22. 34-78-83
    If I could only prove it I'd bet you my paycheck right now thats not the case. (right or wrong)
  23. 34-78-83
    No word on Rosen's picture?
  24. 34-78-83
    Nice Find ! Halftime adjustments have always, to me, been the surest sign that you have quality coaching on your staff. This is of course very encouraging for us!
  25. 34-78-83
    I don't think we're going back but for just one game. I could be wrong though....
×
×
  • Create New...