Jump to content

34-78-83

Community Member
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    6,181

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Everything posted by 34-78-83

  1. 34-78-83
    Bottom of the 8th
  2. 34-78-83
    More cushion for the pushin' baby!
  3. 34-78-83
    Sig line removed......
  4. 34-78-83
    I really think I love you Deeray. . .
  5. 34-78-83
    No turnovers vs. Jets / Fish / Cards. Suddenly there is "no way" he doesn't turn the ball over now? It's not a closed case just yet.
  6. 34-78-83
    Booing will be instant. Turnovers will be 0.
  7. 34-78-83
    Naw I liked you a lot more until I met you in person Campy < just kidding >
  8. 34-78-83
    Classic ICE! I think I found a new sig
  9. 34-78-83
    I want a divorce!
  10. 34-78-83
    BWaaaHAAAAHAAAAAA!!!!!! Yeah Right!
  11. 34-78-83
    There are 31 other teams out there who would gladly prove to the doubters just how good EM is the moment he (hypothetically) got let go. It would be a damn shame if it ever happened. He is easily the second best receiver we have ever had here, with all due respect to the shortened career of Jerry Butler.
  12. 34-78-83
    I don't see what the problem is The 10 to 20 of you Chicken Little /Everone Must GO!/ I am smarter than an NFL Coach and GM folks can all kick back here while everyone else enjoys the game.
  13. 34-78-83
    It's a definite maybe!
  14. 34-78-83
    If DR. ICE says he can play, then he can play!
  15. 34-78-83
    Hey there mr. Crazy!
  16. 34-78-83
    Touche'
  17. 34-78-83
    I'd also add though that while I agree that teams are generally out to shut down our running game and make Drew try to beat them, The O-line still needs to block better for the riunning game. There are teams out there who can run at will , wether it's based on talent or intelligence, and we need to get closer to that to be effective, especially with the amount of poor weather our team plays in.
  18. 34-78-83
    *< Crickets chirping > * ...... ......... ...... ........... ..... You know DC I think that may require a thread of it's own
  19. 34-78-83
    You know ... that really hasn't been brought up here yet I'm sorry I couldn't help myself
  20. 34-78-83
    Well conducted thread Simon and all... I'd add that I think at times the missed assignments mentioned postgame by the coach included backs and TE's. Of course everyone has a mind of their own but this is something that can often influence an overall perception of how an O-line is playing. The O-line is the Rodney Dangerfield of football. They don't get talked about when they make good plays combined with the fact that when Joe Schmoe sees a Defensive lineman coming clean he assumes that an offensive lineman is at fault. Sometimes that is the case, and sometimes it is the responsibiltiy of a back or TE , and other times yet it is a planned unaccounted for man that the play is designed to account for by the flow of the football.
  21. 34-78-83
    That was actually pretty cool
  22. 34-78-83
    1- Good info ICE, thanks. 2- Your quest to be "right" in the minds of all grows nearly as strong as at this time last year.
  23. 34-78-83
    I'm not sure about Clements not cutting it. Since not making a smart play on the ball in week 1 he has been very solid in coverage, enough so that teams generally aren't throwing his way. He could learn a thing or two still from old AW in run support though. Also, McGee I thought bounced back nicely Sunday night from his piss poor outing vs. the Jets. If you have a tape, watch the plays he was involved in again and look at his improved coverage technique. The Bills were blasted mostly over the middle and vs. zone schemes. This was a non-chickenlittle-esque thread so I thought I might put my $.02 in.
  24. 34-78-83
    I will continue to post whatever I feel like posting at any time, but thanks for your concern
  25. 34-78-83
    The sky is falling!!!! The sky is falling!!!
×
×
  • Create New...