MarlinTheMagician

He ain't like Mac Jones. Couldn't be much different. Jones has a noodle. McCarthy does not. And whether or not he is good, McCarthy got the dog in him, ex-hockey playing with a bit of nasty. Mac Jones = tennis player.

Maybe you're right, but I think he is good. No one really knows. But I remain glad the Jets didn't take him! When Rogers breaks they can roll with Tyrod instead of McCarthy. I'll take that!

I don't dislike RGIII at all. Seems like a good dude. But I thought it was so funny that RGIII was trying to bond with Coleman over being from Louisiana and Coleman was not having it. "Nah, you got all that French stuff - we a little more country out in Appaloosa, but we got some stuff too,." RGIII: I'll show you, you can get the best Poh Boy at a gas station. Coleman: Nah, our gas station got two pumps." 🤣

What do I know really, but the reviews I have read say he has a very powerful arm. That was on display in the games I watched. The criticism I read is that he throws everything hard, and sometimes lacks the desired touch.

Jets should have went hard for McCarthy. He was there for them. Instead they took a tackle to keep the Rogers dream alive. But McCarthy is probably good enough right now to win behind that defense. I watched him a lot at Michigan because I had a daughter there. Jets would have been like Michigan all over - very strong defense, do enough on offense to not screw it up and maybe even make some plays. Glad they took the tackle.

All this sturm and drang over a pick that Beane, Josh Allen and our scouts were obviously comfortable with from a bunch of arm-chair experts is exhausting. Give the man a chance. For me, he is the best wide-receiver drafted until he gives me reason to give up the dream. By definition, he has not yet done so. Let's go baby 20-0!

What you say about baseball is true in your baseball example. But it is not analogous or instructive here. If Coleman's gauntlet time was aided by the fact that he mistakenly went out of bounds, they would have thrown out the time and made him do it over. Like a false start in the 40 yard dash. Going out of bounds did not help his Gauntlet time. And the original poster did not suggest that it did - he was just deriding Coleman for making a mistake. The time he ran is his time. The mistake was perhaps a dumb mistake, but it didn't, couldn't, aid his time. They would never allow him to compare favorably to other prospects based on an inadvertent "cheat" like running full speed past second base even if it was an ineffective baseball move (because the runner would be out at second). They posted the combine time that Coleman earned, and that happened to be the fastest. There is no way around that.

Man, I have come full circle on this pick. Just watched the full interview the poster put up earlier. That kind of easy confidence from a 20 year-old strongly suggests to me he is going to be a star. Confidence like that comes from past performance and knowing what you can do. Focused, but not a care in the world. I think he is going to be a great pro, putting my stake in the ground today. And I hated the pick - maybe I was right then and wrong now, but I think he is a star in the league.

I think he also ran last in that or another drill. I love our Hardy pick - my daughter goes to Penn State so I watched him a lot. He runs a 4.38, I believe. Hits like a truck too. But I don't think the 5'9" Hardy would enjoy covering Coleman. Different courses for different horses -- seems people don't accept that.

Wow. Didn't know that. Thanks for posting!

This is a self-defeating argument my man. Guys that slow down to catch the ball are not as fast as their 40 time where the ain't gotta catch no nothing. Poster was not being a grumpy old man. As a grumpy old man I take some offense to that!

Cooper Kupp Correction of my self - THE fastest gauntlet time in two years. Second fastest go route. No one jogs in the gauntlet - speed is a core point of the drill.

Exactly. See my immediately prior post. Samuel is juxtaposed with Coleman in our scheme. We have a true speedster there, and Shakir is a 4.4 player. Adding Coleman allows us to not be bullied by press corners in the playoffs (something that consistently happened to Diggs). As corners get smaller to keep up with the speed of guys like Worthy, Coleman becomes more valuable -- in general and to us in particular. We didn't have that big, physical wideout before. Same here, I was so bummed when we took Coleman. A cooling off period and rational examination of facts and video has made me more than happy to give the young man a chance with an open mind and a hopeful heart! Go Keon!

40 yard dash time is no more directly related to success than other combine stats, and many state that it does not correlate as well as things like route speed. It is undeniable. (see NextGen stats), that the trend is towards smaller, lighter and thus faster receivers. This is proven. The natural response to that is smaller, lighter faster DBs. IMHO, it is very smart to run counter-trend at those smaller DBs. Having a big, bullying WR in the arsenal to swat the nats away. It is illogical to call Coleman "slow" without considering his weight. From NextGen: When analyzing speed, it is also crucial to factor in weight. In addition to being the fastest receiver class, the 2024 crop is the second lightest, averaging 196.1 pounds -- lighter than the 2003 class by over 6 pounds. This is not just a one-year anomaly, either. The last four draft classes have featured the four lightest wide receiver groups since 2003. From 2003 to 2020, 820 wide receivers were invited to the combine. Only 25 of them (3 percent) weighed 175 pounds or less. Over these last four draft classes (including the 2024 group), the percentage of players checking in below that weight threshold has more than doubled, to 8.3 percent, with 15 total receivers weighing in at 175 pounds or less.

So Coleman didn't just run the fastest gauntlet time this year, he ran the fastest in the last TWO years. The fastest last year - who also had a slow 40 -- was Puka Nakua and Coleman was faster than him. At least Puka didn't jog, and he is not too bad.

And for those asking about "Group 8" - that may just be a NextGen Stats thing. HIs Gauntlet and "GO" results are from among all wideouts it appears. From the Lions pre-draft fan board: Keon Coleman, Florida State (6-foot-3 1⁄4, 213 pounds) The former Michigan State product may have turned some fans away with his 4.61 40-yard dash—the second slowest time of the wide receiver group—but for a team like the Lions that value GPS timing over the 40, Coleman is still likely high atop their wide receiver rankings. As the NFL Network broadcast brought up several times, NFL Rookie of the Year candidate Puka Nacua (4.57 40-yard dash) ran the fastest time in the “gauntlet drill” last year (20.06 MPH), illustrating how his GPS speed translates more than straight-line speed. This year, Coleman took home the honor of the fastest gauntlet time (20.36 MPH), the second fastest “go route” time (21.71 MPH)—behind only Thomas—as well as landing in the top four of several other categories Next Gen Stats GPS tracks. Coleman’s game film points to his route precision needing to be cleaned up, but in on-field drills, you could tell he is working on that part of his game. While going full speed through the routes, Coleman stayed on course and covered ground very quickly. He got low into his breaks and showed explosion getting out of them. His length showed up in his stride and catching radius, and his hands looked very solid on the day as a whole.

W\ Why in the world would others be "dogging it' at the combine that defines their pay for the next 4-5 years? That rings hollow with me. If they were, I don't want any of those guys.

Not trying to be difficult either, but consider that fuller stats being posted (without comment) is a fair response to the relentless insistence that he IS slow based on his 40 - a single data point. He may or may not be "slow" for the position, but relying heavily on the 40 is neither fair nor sound analysis. So if you want to say he is slow you need to rely on game tape. Interpretation of the tape is intensely subjective. Beane says he plays faster than his 40. That is his interpretation. Coleman's size is a factor, as is his flexibility for such size. So the smart play, IMHO, is to give the man a chance and not pre-judge it. And I wanted McConkey. But now I am a hugely behind Coleman until he gives me a reason not to be. He has not done so.

Too swag to run it. It is a good point.

And if "others jogged" and Coleman did his best, that is a data point I personally like - effort. I think the "Go" might simulate the 60 better than the 40.

No one said you did give an opinion on the pick, and I am sure no one is tracking that, but you are putting an unnecessarily negative slant on data that is objective. Example: you can't know the level of effort other receivers put out when running the four routes. His ranking in those routes is what it is. I posted the results without judgment or comment. They are what they are. If others jogged, that's on them. All the best to you bro.

No one is jogging at the combine, are they? If you say so I am sure he ran out of bounds, but that does not in any way detract from the speeds recorded on the routes or his performance running the Gauntlet. Tip-toeing comes after the run across the field - the meat of the drill. So what if he made a mistake? I can tell you hate the pick, I hated it when made, but there is reason for optimism. Seems like a good dude - give the young man a chance.

I am sure most of you know he also ran the second fastest time in the "Gauntlet" at the combine, which many say simulates game speed better than the 40-yard dash. They are supposed to run it straight across the yardline. Many can't. Coleman's straight as an arrow, and his receiving form looks A+ to me. The video is worth a 10 second watch.

In another thread a poster asked where I found the following. I post it here in case anyone finds it interesting:

Yeah, that's not right. I am sorry I can't pinpoint it, but you can find it pretty easy on Google. There is also a great article you can find on the fading reliance on draft 40 times in favor of GPS-measured game speed. Beane is quoted in it a couple months before the draft. Headline is something like "Are 40 times becoming obsolete" or "Is the 40-yard dash archaic." I will jump on Google and try to find the Coleman stuff and post it if I do. Cheers, and Go Bills! Here is a link - NextGenStats.