Just in Atlanta

Decent stats. But the real question is whether we're "fitting it up" and "living and dying by our Front 4". That's what I really want to know. Maybe we can pick Wanny's brain on how to improve our run D. Anyone have his number down in Tampa Bay?

I was at McFadden's two years ago when we beat Oakland. So fun.

Let em wear what they want. They're athletes, not execs.

Thanks. One poster said Charlotte is Buffalo's "doppelganger." So true. Charlotte looked like Buffalo out there. You lost because of conservative offensive play-calling. Your OC/HC needs to let Cam do what he does. But hey, this D looks legit. What a difference b/t this scheme and last year's.

As for the question, that seems pretty lame to me. Reminds me of when Ralphie got the decoder ring and was told to drink more Ovaltine. As for BarkLessWagMore's avatar, as well as the pictures I've seen of Sanchez, is he wearing a girl's hair band? WTF?

I've always suspected Canadians were made.

Throwup unis. Worst unis in the NFL. Utterly awful. The colors even clashed, and the stripes were completely different ... wtf?!. Dark times, times that should never be revisited. When I think of those, I think Dick Juaron, Trent Edwards, JP Losman, Kelly Holcomb, and utter hopelessness.

At least he didn't blame God.

Happy pill time.

The Pats. Irrelevant. New coaching staff, new QB, new schemes. What's the Bills record against the Pats in the 90s? Logic, man, logic. Fred got over 100 (5.5 yards per carry to boot), their RB got over 100. Wallow in this silliness if you want.

The Patriots were also without Wes Welker, Ty Law, Andre Trippett and Tedy Bruschi. Good grief, people. Logic.

The Pats got zero sacks, and very few hurries. Brady was under near constant pressure. Did you even watch the same game? Seriously. This defense is light years ahead of last year's in terms of penetration.

The Pats' receivers dropped MANY balls. SJ is an asset. There are many reasons why the Bills lost. If you want to throw spears at him, so be it.

Last of three "official" sentiment polls until midseason. The other polls can be found here and here. Mods: If we could lock these threads Sunday Sept. 15 at Noon (one week from now), that would be great. This one is on your overall sentiment for the 2013 season. We'll address this again midseason. Cheerio.

Mods--Think it would be nice to have more questions here. We can only ask three.

For the other poll, go to http://forums.twobillsdrive.com/topic/161239-bills-2013-official-sentiment-poll-draftees/

For those unsure what this is, check out this thread. And here is the first sentiment poll. This one is on our first three draftees. Off we go... *Mods--is it possible to change this so we can add two more questions? We're limited to only three, and I wanted an overall sentiment of the entire draft on here as well as one on Goodwin.

First off, my apologies for not doing this right after the draft like I said I would. What is an "official sentiment" poll? Many of us kind of agreed that a centralized thread on our feelings on big issues was a good idea. To recap, I think it will be fun, and informative, to compare reality with our past opinions on just a few threads, as opposed to having to search through a gazillion. We should only have a limited number yearly -- with the same tags (2013 Bills sentiment, 2014 Bills sentiment, etc). That way, they will be easier to find and they will become a better metric for measuring feelings and analyzing fandom. The first one is on the coaches and management. I'll put up another on our draftees. In the near future, I'll put up another on the overall state of the Bills. Will likely have another set mid-season and at the end then after the draft. That's about five or six per season. If you think this is lame, no need to participate. I just think it's a cool idea to have a central place to examine these kinds of things. We will have to close this thread soon, so don't hesitate on voting. On the third question, you should have two answers. Off we go...

I wonder what the Wiccan community has to say about the Wizards.

Don't know -- he appears to be a No. 4 WR, so probably not much -- but I'm starting SJ this week. On another note, the guy right before me in Rd. 1 picked CJ--at No. 4 no less--thought he would be mine at 5 no problem. $#%*! Not quite used to having Bills players go that high.

In fairness, it is a relevant stat for Twitter. Only so much context in 140 characters... But yeah, what a penile response.

Sweeet.

Hopefully, it can help them find the endzone.

White font is not visible. I do think teal is pretty safe. I'm really hoping someone here will come out and say it's offensive. Because despite all this outrage in these stories, I've yet to see a comment from anyone actually outraged, even in this sick PC culture we live under.

Dunkin' Donuts is "under fire" -- the term the media use when they want to create a controversy out of thin air because one person they called thinks it's "racist" -- for depicting a face in black to advertise a new donut abroad. Is there really anyone here who is offended by this? If so, look deep within yourself. Can you really say you don't have deep hypersensitive issues about race yourself? And if this black face -- which IMO is stunning and actually makes me want to eat one of these donuts, which is the point of advertising -- is offensive, then what about Ronald McDonald? Or the Pillsbury Doughboy? http://www.takepart.com/article/2013/08/31/dunkin-donuts-blackface-ad?cmpid=foodinc-fb