NoSaint

Well, I have made my crossman opinion known but in this thread.... unless your answer gets us to the 30 regularly than the real answer is just kneel, no?

First you have to ID what each did wrong. You can follow the system and mess up. You can’t skirt the system intentionally.

What an odd mish mash of varying font sizes and such for a serious statement to be presented in

More and better replays better access access to the full slate of games more and better access to fellow fans to complain with more shows talking about it if anything, odds are the refs have never been better. They have more training, access to reviews, etc...

Sammy *ducks and runs*

“Has to be seen” and “conclusive” aren’t the same thing. we can conclude plenty of things through various deductions without seeing. And I also feel like I see it. Agree to disagree at this point

Id honestly say they made it very clear, but fans (and some players, coaches etc..) don’t like it and are arguing it should be hazier

Plus all those previous NFC wins.... it’s like they didn’t want to get in. good thing they learned and really lost that saints game, thus helping our playoff odds

If you havent caught the ball yet, how can you score? It’s an easy flow of logic between the two. Essentially changing the whole rule to remove the steps needed on an upright catch and making the football move and in bounds the only two qualifiers? what if he doesn’t tuck/extend? Just “catches“ it outstretched and goes down and the ball comes out? And what if it’s only in his hands a split second? Just playing devils advocate on what would potentially be the new edge plays.

And he got a big pick against Julio in that game. At current trajectory, yea I probably do agree there. I think white and abouther first will likely make up for the small gap between white and lattimore

They do seem to have a better pass rush. Cam Jordan is having a hugely underrated season. I also think they have a better CB1. that doesn’t mean I think poorly of ours. Both have been very good.

I’ve watched every snap of both teams, which I think counts for something in forming that opinion.

What gets interesting is that grants refs wider judgment. Generally that’s the worst case scenario for most fans, outside of the handful of plays they don’t like the firm rule on. At least this way all 16 crews have a flat standard instead of things like holding or pass interference etc... For instance, how long does the falling player need to hold the ball? They’d have to really do a lot to rework the rule to create a new bright line for possession and you’ll never perfectly regulate the very edge plays.

I don’t think I agree with what you see but I definitely appreciate you outlining it. Not arguing just to be argumentative here but truly didn’t get what you were seeing before that.

At a very simplified glance, yes. would a late slap be worse than a dozen occurrences of the Davis hit? Obviously no. so I think we agree both severity and frequency of transgression matters. Based on the short outline it looks like in a vacuum Gronk gets suspended and Davis gets a fine. But Davis being a repeat offender comes with escalators. Less outrageous depending on the details of the resume.

I do generally agree with the sentiment but think you have to look at the totality. He wasn’t suspended 2 games for a single hit. He was suspended 2 games for a series of hits, with this being the most recent. That’s why I’m pressing a bit on the history.

Ignoring your made up standard. What do you assert is between the grass and the ball? I say nothing and do believe we see that. But even in entertaining your opinion, if we can eliminate all the possible body parts - then you can prove there’s nothing between without seeing the actual contact

That’s not truly the standard. if I showed you a picture of the receivers hands a foot from the ball, and no reasonable parts under but the view of the edge touching the ground is blocked— obviously you can extrapolate and make the call. this is the less extreme version. Unless you can reasonably articulate what’s under the ball the ref can go with the ground being under it. I see the same issue- the hand is too far outside and forward on the ball to be underneath the back half (the low point). elbow hits causing him to lose his left hands control and thereby jostling the ball as the back half hits the ground. He’s still got hands on it so it doesn’t fly away but it moves while touching the ground. What fingers do you see under the ball?

What part of it? Most is visible in the photo and not under the ball.

In the photo with the “ball comes loose” text added in this thread... what is between the ball and grass? We see two non consecutive fingers on the upper and outside part of the ball. To have fingers on the lower half towards the center would take an oddly shaped hand, no?

To be fair the cooks one looks like a bad call but the jets seemed to be a fumble and yesterday looks incomplete But you can see multiple and non consecutive fingers not under it. He’d have to have a freakish thumb and ring finger to be under the ball, no? Can you show a pic illustrating a reasonable spot his hand could be under it?

But what was the incident? Just one incident? You get what I’m asking.

What is the history on Davis? Seems highly relevant to the debate and I don’t recall the hit(s) prior to this

Dramatic much? If the expectation is they have to be perfect or else all hell breaks lose than of course the issue might be more fans than league. i still don’t get what y’all are arguing is under the ball besides the ground though.

Isnt it only in the pocket? Essentially they are treated as defenseless when looking downfield. As a runner/blocker they can be hit in the head (within same legal bounds as any other player) That puts a lot on suh processing things in the moment. Whether or not you think he did it I have a hard time buying a complex sell in a split second. I’d venture it was just “suh smash” and the rest is us trying to create narratives