NoSaint

yea either that or the angle made it look much worse- or both. it wasn’t laziness or anything though. Clearly he would like a big touchdown.

it never felt like they’d throw the same flags for him Though. Those two things can co-exist

it’s hard to assemble a strong defense, pay a qb AND have a complete offense. that’s going to be a common thread and we will need to draft excellent. There’s a reason why I beat the “go all in” drum the last two years.

So dramatic. presnap we give him a lot of freedom. If he checked into some fast breaking routes that kept the defense more honest, it might help. No one implied every down. he’s getting a good bit of the read of the defense pre snap and a lot more in the first 2-3 steps they take. If instead of exhausting the downfield he sometimes sequenced quicker good outcomes might happen is all.

I just find it hard to believe this group thought they were owed something and wouldn’t have to earn it as the reason. Even if an opponent wants to use the “we want it more” to hype his own roster. You mean the common sense answer instead of throwing out everything we know about this group?

that is horrific to the point I highly question its accuracy. The guys would be getting hit at the exchange. On every single play. do you believe 8 inches before contact would seem abnormal by your eye?

brought it up after Tennessee as a frustration that night. Was not great.

Fate?

I think some of our fans were more comfortable with an actual bad team than a good team that will some weeks underwhelm

I think I saw a lot of talk about them mailing it in but not sure

some weeks you just suck. im sure we all have those days.

It was a bad week. Toughen up, Nancy.

18 would probably do you in pretty good. that said, in the good ol college days, a number like that over the course of a 10pm to 4am kind of night could be managed if staying active, hydrated, fed, and not just pounding 18 shots of whiskey in a half hour. Especially if the bars aren’t pouring heavy and a few of glasses you don’t actually finish fully. you start doing that volume and 5% at the bottom of the glass becomes a full drink not consumed, misplace 1-2 partials along the the way, etc…

that’s a very real consideration in why it’s not just run of the mill dangerous driving. This is an order of magnitude worse. Ruggs was essentially shooting a gun down Main Street. As noted earlier, I don’t think it’s the first time he’s pulled the trigger, just the first time he hit something.

91 is joshs responsibility as a read and neutralize with his own decision

I think we can all agree on: it would be shocking to find out this was his first drunk driving incident it would be shocking to find out he never drove well over 100 before

I do wonder if he’s missing the mark on the “being there for him at 3am” sentiment this isn’t the high school kid nervous about getting in trouble making a bad choice trying to get home. the man decided to joy ride at the most extreme levels.

There’s less than zero chance. They’d make the team sign Street free agents before postponing the super bowl

any respectable team would draw a hard boundary of not monitoring this service. It’s to keep guys out of the news, not to give them a hard time

I amend my previous comment to say he is lucky to only get 20 years

realistically, if shooting in the dark completely… somewhat viable odds he gets 2 years- reduced with good behavior. Misses this year and next… and then maybe he comes back. For tryouts for the 2023 season. but it’s too early to say how likely it is.

6 ft 5 in 1/8 8.03 and 5.76 being their percentiles on a 1-10

they are all nfl players, and often the line between 3 tds and 3 ints can be inches… but I’m not betting the house any more than when fitz occasionally had big games with Stevie. Did you think those were “extra motivation” or just you roll a couple dice enough and the number sometimes comes up?

no. I think the pats proved getting a top seed against soft opponents is much more important than a crushing schedule

no. Nor do I think a drunk driver does. And when they had multiple mishaps with firearms that only happen if flaunting the rules, proceed to remove the crew for their safety concerns, not regroup and implement proper protocol, and then end up killing someone as a result of continuing to ignore that protocol…. intent starts to become secondary to reckless disregard for safety. I don’t think he intended to kill anybody but I don’t think he intended to keep them safe either. indeed. It should’ve been on their body and they should’ve brought it on scene. The early reports that the AD grabbed it off a table and handed it over without checking are not good. everyone in a risk management role on site deserves to be ruined by this if the early reports are accurate.