Jump to content

RyanC883

Community Member
  • Posts

    15,431
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by RyanC883

  1. if you are getting them in the cheap seats, be wary of bad weather. Even a decent opponent, if there is cold rain, the prices will plummet.
  2. if he put in a minimal of effort he could have stuck around as an "average" NFL player. He seems to just have relied solely on his talent. Total waste of it. I don't think the NFL is anything like the discipline required for the military. Lots of jobs require discipline/effort/desire. glad to hear he's a nice guy. Hopefully with age he has turned it around and is ready to put in the work. If so, the talent is still there, and that DL for the Ravens could be something.
  3. Top 2: would like to get Klein and Williams back. Hughes would be nice, but he'd have to come likely below market.
  4. my pick also, for the 4th year in a row
  5. I'd agree, but we have no depth there. Not that Ford is great depth, but is cheap and I'm not sure what else is out there.
  6. he's from Louisiana. going to play for his "home team" i think. and glad he is not on KC! I think the Saints will be sneaky good this year. Not SB contenders, but make the playoffs and give TB some issues in the division.
  7. safety and IOL have to be high on next years FA/Draft list.
  8. I really hope he does. He has the physical traits to be one. As far as elite, I don't think even with 10 sacks he'd be "elite" this year. An "elite" rusher is a guy commanding double teams for himself. Very good pass rusher would be nice to see. I can see 10 sacks for him.
  9. Neither do I. But if he shows no improvement in the preseason, he could be a surprise cut based on his lackluster performances his first two years if there is a FA the Bills like more. His rookie year he had the "COVID lack of training camp" excuse. No excuse for last year. I hope he turns it around.
  10. this is why "rankings" mean nothing. Look at the QBs that gave us that ranking last year. I think our "ranking" will be lower, but we will have a better D. LA had a better D and won the Super Bowl, but was "ranked" lower. That is hopefully us this year. (although I'd love to be a truly ranked 1 D against good competition)
  11. I'd love Hughes back as well. He would be better on paper than Lawson or Basham at reserve DE, but not for what we paid him last year. AJ perhaps getting cut if he has a bad preseason? Likely not given our lack of depth and his scheme familiarity, but it's put up time for him.
  12. lots of ??? on both O and DL. Not great, but we can't plug every hole. Getting Von Miller can cover up a lot of issues on the DL, like Josh does for the OL. We need better interior OL, and I think that will be the target next draft. We fixed what we could, but losing is never good. We want to win every year. The 13 seconds are not some sort of motivational tool. We should have won last year, and we should win this year. We have top talent. fair point that we lost because of our D giving everything up, but many playoff games come down to the wire. We didn't close. We did lose because of those 13 seconds and how we played the rest of the game. Two independent reasons of why we lost.
  13. Elam with a caveat. If we don't play more press this year, I'll hate the pick because there was then no reason to trade up for him given the other CBs left on the board. Gordon is also good in press, but Elam is more physical/better. 1. Those were the two I was between. Shakir is a better value pick, but I think Elam, if properly used, can be a stud. 2. It's not a regular punter, the dude kicks it 80+ yards. Our fans are the best, we love great players at all positions equally!
  14. another reason I couldn’t give it an A. We did not get an Edmunds replacement B+ is good.
  15. that’s why I had a B-plus. OL is a concern.
  16. Ideally the DT gets him. Edmunds gets lost so much that I could see the OP’s position being a backup plan or the plan until Edmunds is replaced. He’s just not a difference maker and between him and Knox next year, I’m keeping Knox.
  17. I think the plan at TE is the Texas A&M UDFA guy with the 1 RAC score. If he actually plays well, he will be here next year. If not, we have OJ and Knox for now, and can draft OJ replacement and likely resign Knox. The Edmunds plan confuses me. The lack of IOL is concerning.
  18. Agreed. I like that he is too grabby. Rather dial a player back than the other way around.
  19. out-kicks punt coverage?. its why we got some fast st guys in the draft also.
  20. someone in need of WR help should take him. Green Bay.
  21. awesome effort here. I think Matakevich may be out for Benford.
  22. wow. seems like elite talent he is wasting. in this https://www.draftcountdown.com/2022-nfl-draft/the-curious-case-of-jalen-wydermyer/
  23. hoping for a LB next pick. IOL seems to be thin right now
  24. seems like a reach. Had a 7-UDFA grade on him. Bean must have really wanted him for some reason. Looks like from reports he is good in press. Hopefully we press more this year given our two CB picks who are good at press. Also looks like he could flip to safety at some point. Just going off NFL.com writeup.
×
×
  • Create New...