All_Pro_Bills

I have nothing to say about Laura but these conspiracies and ther proponents would not exist if the government would be transparent and honest with Americans by releasing all the facts and conclusions gathered during their official investigation. As is customary, they always leave us with an incomplete story typically justified by vague and undefined national security concerns. Avoiding transparency at any cost. The lack of candor leaves a lot of room for speculation and there are plenty of conspiracy peddlers that are happy to fill in the blanks. The government simply prefers this to telling the truth.

I believe Starr is Billstime's evil twin.

Wishful thinking and slogans are not a plan.

So Harris has no plan.

And when they lose militarily? What?

For the sake of argument let's say that is Trump's plan. Now that that's out of the way, what's the Biden or Haris plan for a negotiated peaceful settlement of the conflict? Is there any plan or any intelligent ideas? More importantly something reflecting the realities of the situation?

None of those things you've mentioned are things democrats have supported during this administration's term.

So more big government spending programs that will make everything more expensive and produce more inflation. And Medicare coverage, not so great. Pays 80% of covered charges.

Well, it sure is free for everybody else when the U.S. taxpayer gets to pay the bill.

So two great big defense contractor taxpayer funded welfare bottomless money pits.

It's all quite logical. It can't be because of Harris' positions on issues or the details around them because who knows what those are exactly. I'd invite you to provide us some detail around those if you could. Rather, she works in an industry that is dominated by the far left where endorsing Trump and breaking from the herd would result in her being exiled from most or all social circles, media appearances, public & private events, and awards. Simply, while Swift has already earned a bundle and has a high net worth, her future income stream would be threatened. Once again, the theme of pure self-interest rears its head.

Harris fared well but it's 100% certain she's going to do exactly what the DNC machine tells her to do and the belief she's going to set policy and the agenda for the administration is an illusion like it was with Biden. Trump failed to get that message across that she can claim any position she'd like to, put on a good show, and get passing grades for the debate but none of it matters. Because if she wins just like Biden, she'll do exactly what the radical left says and is just a puppet and answering all the softball questions from the mods won't change that truth. Missed opportunity to embarrass her and the moderators and get that message to the voters at the same time.

The media bias is clear. Its one major takeaway from the event. They covered for Biden's mental condition when it was obvious something was erong nd now they're covering for Harris. Many objective people are asking the same question that you ask. If the press can't be neutral with these debates then they should be limited to setting topics. Just let the two candidates fight it out like we do in real life. I think Harris did well but I have to deduct points for degree of difficulty because she was babies by the mods. Just as expected

Truthfully, we don't need a new border bill. Just enforce the rules and criteria for asylum status. Almost all of the people coming across are seeking economic relief. That doesn’t qualify you for asylum. Criminals don't qualify. They should be deported right now. But they're not. Rather most get released to repeat more crimes. The problems we have won"t be solved by more laws because the problem is this administration won't enforce the current laws and claims they would suddenly enforce new laws if only Republicans would go along are without merit or evidence. Stop pretending otherwise. Dispute that if you wish.

I didn't watch the entire show because i can't stand the format and the questions. Its more like a joint press conference than a one-on-one debate between two people. Which is what we need to see. But of what i did see i thought Harris was composed and performed well and Trump came off a little agitated and rambling in some responses. Sure the mods favored Harris but that was a given. One thing i did see was Muir ask Trump for is details of his deportation proposal and rather than doing what I would have done, he proceeded into a lengthy and unorganized response. i would have simply said the following. About 15 million people crossed our border claiming asylum. The rules and criteria are clear. What's also clear is Harris has no intention of enforcing the rules. Allowing and sending all these people into communities across the country without keeping track of most. Everyone gets a hearing. If their claim is valid they can stay but if it isn't they can't stay. If they don't show up for the hearing they can't stay. My administration will follow the rules and enforce existing rules and law. A Harris administration won't. Just an example of how he responded and seemed unprepared to give sharp and focused responses.

I'm objective enough to say Trump has his flaws in character and behavior. And his policy ideas aren't perfect. But they're way less damaging than what Biden has done and what Harris will continue and most likely amplify. Can any posters supporting Harris say anything negative about her? I haven't seen it yet. So walk the talk dude.

You really do have a blind spot when it comes to establishment politicians of both parties. At some point you're going to realize your faith is misplaced.

You do that. And while you're at it keep trusting and believing in all the hacks driving our country to an eventual economic and social disaster while they line their pockets with your tax dollars.

The Inflation Reduction Act funds hard at work rebuilding America. Don't be surprised when it breaks the Biden administration is making direct payments to Mexican cartels to bring people to the US and Washington politicians are getting a cut of the drug trade profits. Our system is utterly corrupt and beyond repair.

"A danger to national security". They need to be more specific to be taken seriously. And the fact that they don't cite the most obvious "threat to national security", an open southern border automatically disqualifies their opinion. Like the Chaney's and others these people are scared they're going to lose power, influence, and $$$$$ and their views are simply pure self-interest.

Don't let these ex-generals fool you. Its all about the money with these dudes. So anytime you get former leadership of the military industrial complex saying you're a threat to one thing or another means you're on the right track to busting up their gravy train. What you're actually a threat to is their vested interests in flip-flopping jobs between public and private sectors, lucrative board of director positions with major defense contractors and cushy gigs at war-advocating think tanks. All these moochers feeding off the public trough of taxpayer money skimming mid-six plus figures out of the system are scared. When you scare them it means you're pressing the right buttons and asking the right questions.

The entire situation in Springfield is an example of how the government, in this case the Biden administration FUBARS everything. Clearly this community is too small with inadequate resources to handle 15K to 20K immigrants but they dump them there anyway. While its clear the idiots are clearly intent on eliminated border security without any regard for negative consequences (attempting to pin the blame on somebody else is a popular approach) they really haven't thought out how exactly to handle the influx of people. They're either incompetent, malicious, or simply do not care. None of those options are acceptable. My initial proposal to solve the problem would be to ship all these government officials to a melting ice flow in the Arctic drifting into a warm current of Shark infested waters. This would likely fail because the Sharks would not attack them out of "professional courtesy"

If that's true why does the fringe nutjob liberal controlled government and their media allies try so hard to suppress and censor all the alleged "propaganda" these right wing nut jobs have to say? To protect the public? Ha, ha.

Social media censors, "fact checkers", and the Magic 8-Ball say Yes!

While I generally don't agree with the concept, lots of countries impose tariffs for various reasons. To protect domestic industries, to counter foreign government subsidies, to counter "dumping" activity, to raise revenue. Wikipedia lists 197 countries here. I https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_tariff_rate