All_Pro_Bills

More or less agree with one exception. Losing our freedoms. I'm curious how you think our freedoms will be taken away? Is Trump going to revoke the constitution? Overthrow our system of government and install some sort of dictatorship? In his first term in office he couldn't even run a functional administration, was constantly sabotaged from inside and outside his administration, got impeached twice, and yet he's going to pull off some sort of takeover once elected? Why can't he just do it without winning the election? I constantly hear the mantra of threats to democracy but nobody can articulate the specific threat or how he's going to pull it off. In order to become some supreme dictator you need a few things. The support of the military and federal agencies to enforce the change. Boots on the ground to suppress the push back and resistance that always follows such actions. You'll going to have to kill and arrest a lot of people. Is he going to do that on his own? Do people think the military will back Trump's coup attempt? Why didn't they back him in 2020? What government agencies, filled with democrats are going to back Trump? Are his old and out of shape supporters going to form citizen militias to provide the muscle? That doesn't seem like it would work out to well. It sounds more like the plot of a situation comedy. I think all the talk about threats to democracy mean threats to the democrats losing power. They're trying to scare the voters to keep them in power. I don't think they've done anything to deserve another 4 years. They can't run on their accomplishments the past 4 years because there aren't any. Our country can't survive another 4 years, especially with a dunce like Harris. But I'm also not excited about another 4 years of Trump. The choice between the two is like picking the cleanest Pig in the mud hole. Its like somebody asking you if you prefer death by the electric chair or the gas chamber.

Jesus was a convicted felon too.

They'll just fake the crossing numbers like they do the monthly jobs reports.

It failed because all it would do is provide the administration cover so they can say they did something while they ignore the provisions of the border bill and don't enforce any limits. They've been ignoring the law and US security needs from day 1 of Biden's Presidency so why start now? They weren't fooling anybody.

This is getting complicated. First the action with Hezbollah is escalating. Soon the woke protesters will need to get Hezbollah costumes to compliment their Palestinian garb for their death to America, death to Israel, death to anybody we don't like, protests. And if Turkey acts and Israel responds by attacking Turkey does that invoke NATO article 5 and is the US now obligated to attack Israel in the defense of Turkey? An attack on one is an attack on all, right?

Another problem was a lack of confidence that the administration would actually enforce the limit rather than fudge the numbers on actual crossings.

I enjoy your snippets of history and your perspective on them but find it curious why your view of present events lacks the same objective and clear observations.

In this case it was the incumbent that cheated. Opposite of USA 2020.

Because Asians as a collective group have been more successful at achieving the "American Dream" than other minorities they are considered to be "White Supremacist" adjacent. So their voices do not matter to the liberals running the major cities.

They like to tell stories. Stories the faithful buy into without too much thinking, maybe no thinking at all. Because "experts" told them this. So it must be true. Right? Like Trump is going to become a dictator. Without really understanding exactly how such a coup would be carried out. Or like I said above, doing any actual thinking, critical thinking, logical thinking. Its like they're allergic to the concept. This scenario they believe is a guy elected in 2016 that couldn't match wits with the entrenched establishment in carrying out the duties of his office along with installing dozens of "never Trumpers" in his administration committed to sabotaging his agenda is going to outwit the same cast of characters to pull off a coup to declare himself dictator. President for life. Without support from any major public institutions, which includes the military, federal law enforcement, or other foot soldiers that would be needed to suppress any dissent and hold power to rule with an iron fist. What idiots believe this? Well plenty of idiots that identify with being Democrats, that's who. I'll extend an invitation to any of the resident geniuses here that believe this whopper being put out there to scare the voters. Lay it out step by step for us please. How will Trump pull this off?

They make her sound wonderful. Next time I'm looking for a new gig, I'm going to ask Barack and Michelle to re-write my resume.

If you know somebody is lying then deception is not possible. But the media has little to no self-awareness. For some reason they don't understand we're on to their game and they keep embarrassing themselves. Propaganda is not effective if the audience knows its propaganda. The only thing missing from CNN and MSNBC shows like Rachel Maddow ("we now know......") or Joy Reid is the laugh tracks you'll find in most situation comedy shows. The media's latest attempt at levity is claiming Harris had no assignment from the President to handle aspects of the border crisis. Even though, as you state, there's a generous amount of evidence and recorded statements such as the President saying she's on point, available to watch or listen to out there. Who said liberals killed comedy?

When the majority are disappointed the shooter missed you might want to consider that if they find murder an acceptable action for victory by any means you might be dealing with psychos that have no limits. This saving democracy chant is a delusion that helps them rationalize all of this behavior.

Dem leadership picked Harris because they think she has the best chance of winning, at the moment. The choice has less to do with next in line thinking, qualifications, or ideas. She had little of this going for her. If that changes before the convention and they think there is someone else that has a better chance of winning they'll dump her in a heartbeat. In this case, the democratic process is superceded by the necessity to win the crusade against orange man. By any means necessary. And I mean ANY means.

Those Nazi's running wild disguise themselves quite cleverly and call themselves progressives.

But now she's being lauded as some greater orator and the savior of democracy that will defeat the evil orange man. Right now all we're hearing is how popular she is and magically a poll now shows her in front. Who can't get excited? She's just as popular with the fans as an NFL team's back-up QB that's ready to start the next game after the starter had a few bad games. Everyone is all excited and energized at the stadium until the game starts and the back-up throws 2 Ints, completes 5 passes out of 16, and is sacked 3 times in the 1st half. Then reality sets in and everyone suddenly realizes again why they're the back-up QB. Soon that feeling will overwhelm Kamala's supporters too. Wait and watch.

Don't stay up late waiting for Harris to condemn these "mostly peaceful protests". You've got a better chance of Jesus knocking on your front door to let you know he's back. She needs the support of the violent extremist voting block (to, of course, save democracy!) And please, somebody that won't condemn these savages please point out to me where all the threats to democracy "MAGA" people are burning flags and defacing monuments? That threat to democracy chant is another liberal fantasy.

The liberals still imagine themselves as outsiders fighting an unfair system. What this make-believe thinking allows them to ignore is that THEY ARE THE SYSTEM.

Our national government is perfectly capable of discrediting themselves.

So you're willing to forget and forgive one but not the other. Same as the other side? Everybody has biases about their candidate. We should all agree to agree to that. Everybody is focused on the wrong details. They're basing their decisions on popularity contest type of thinking. It is more important to them than the actual policies and agenda they support and execute. That's not a good way to pick a good leader. For me I hate the democrats agenda and their priorities are dysfunctional. They're on their way to transforming America into a dysfunctional 3rd world dump. Whether it's Biden, Harris, or somebody else. Their agenda will be 99% the same. As for Trump I can barely tolerate him but he'll do far less damage to our countrywith his ideas than Harris. Mostly because the left will once again work to sabatoge his administration. As for Biden he should resign immediately and let Harris take over but I suspect the party is against the idea. It would reveal just how awful a President she would be before the election and the opportunity to fool the voters once again, they tricked them with Biden in 2020, would be lost.

To mitigate the risk of another attempt, the Secret Service is encouraging the Trump campaign to avoid scheduling any outdoor rallies which the service has admitted presents too many challenges.

How are all those liberals looking for those imaginary Nazi's among Trump supporters missing this action? Oh yeah I forgot, they're too busy protesting in support of terrorists, masquerading as Muslims, and attacking Jews.

I'm pretty confident it wasn't 92%. And in retrospect, why did Trump even pick Pence? He was politically useless. That and other Trump decisions were head scratchers. Earlier this year I read a blog article from this fellow that penned a story titled "Trumpenstein and the Death of Politics". The writer has an interesting and somewhat comical theory. While I don't buy into it, it is entertaining reading. https://donaldjeffries.substack.com/p/trumpenstein-and-the-death-of-politics

You've got all the talking points covered. Good job. But who really is getting excited about Harris? She's a mediocre politician that hasn't distinguished herself in any way. But maybe I'm missing it. What are her major accomplishments in public life? What did she do as VP? For starters, oversee the border operation and we know that's a total dumpster fire. It seems the people that know her best, her staff, think she's a complete jerk. A 92% staff turnover rate in 3 years is the number I saw. That should be a clue. And once she starts speaking the buzz will ll be over.

Like anything they do, all this enthusiasm from Democrats for Harris is staged and coordinated to create the illusions the base is fired up with the choice. Suddenly, a candidate that polled 3% in the 2020 primaries is hugely popular. My how expectation levels have fallen. And a new poll shows her a few points ahead of Trump! Wow. You might want to note the over-sampling of Democrats in the survey group. That is the reason the polls showing Hillary in front in 2016 were wrong. Reality is the switch from Biden to Harris results in absolutely no change in the agenda. In essence, who they pick is moot other than finding a pliable and controllable replacement front-person President for the Obama wing of the party to pull the strings.