Jump to content

WhitewalkerInPhilly

Community Member
  • Posts

    7,470
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by WhitewalkerInPhilly

  1. The more I read the more I'm convinced that the firing is more of a cumulative issue: the multiple lawsuits about the 2020 election claims, the comments he made about management coming to light during discovery, the "FBI plant" conspiracy shilling, the selective "they had tour guides" video editing, a pending harassment lawsuit. Take your pick. This might have gotten a less popular talking head at a less insane network canned ages ago. But now faced with an actual consequence I don't think Tucker could have gotten away with business as usual. I think it's more finally hitting a boiling point than any one thing. Dude already had a bank. And he will get invited to plenty of White Nationalist speaking engagements
  2. I mean I am sure that the lawsuit had an indirect effect. I highly doubt that Murdoch got hit on the settlement with many more lawsuits pending and didn't get some advice from his lawyers to reduce liability. I am sure that Tucker could have gotten by on general statements via "people are saying" and "I'm just asking questions" but he has gotten in deep on a few claims. I have zero proof, so take it for what it's worth
  3. You mean like the "FBI plant" among the insurrectionists?
  4. I mean, I am here for all of the jokes about this being part of the Dominion settlement but this doesn't quite jive. If it was Dominion has no reason to lie because they'd want to celebrate collecting scalps. What I can believe is that a nearly $787 million payout has changed the network's calculus on letting hosts make specific, defamation case worthy claims. Tucker has one already when he called one of the Jan 6 goons an FBI plant and some of the things he did with the Jan 6 footage. I am speculating, but it would not shock me if the rein were getting pulled hard and fast and Tucker balked. The man is already well off and doesn't need the money. He will land on his feet at some other zit of an organization or start a podcast network.
  5. It's draft time. Take everything you hear from a GM with a grain of salt
  6. As in it's unglamorous but useful and lets you spend money elsewhere?
  7. He's solid, but the eagles have major investment in Kelce and their tackles. It's not shocking to me that they had to let a good o line player walk
  8. Ick. He's actually a good player. So long as he's not on the Phins
  9. My stance is that I would have understood if he never played again after what he went through. I still think we draft a guy in the later rounds
  10. It's a shame that he could never stay consistent
  11. I am assuming that Poyer and his camp took less than they wanted, which is why his agent isn't screaming the deal he got from the rooftops
  12. Two years. I can't imagine it's back breaking money but that's a good length. I'd still look at drafting a S in the mid rounds
  13. On a more serious note, I've been wondering for a day or two. If Poyer didn't get a flood in the open market it makes a lot of sense to stay. I'm glad, one fewer hole to fill.
  14. Oooooooof. I think the fan base was too hard on Edmunds but that is just way too much money. Edmunds and Milano are a lot alike in play. But $18 million a year? Heck no for me
  15. I'm curious to see what is guaranteed money. Because Seattle has Denver's 1st round and 2nd round picks for the next two drafts I absolutely can see them front loading guarantees and then scouring project rookies in the next two years. With a reliable if unspectacular vet at QB locked up, they can afford to do their homework. Can you imagine them trading back again this year to get three first rounders?
  16. I highly doubt that anyone who wasn't on a roster (and therefore able to be signed already) will make too much of a difference. Probably depth.
  17. "Yeah the doctor said that you ladies should all get tested too, and get some antibiotics. I can't believe it was that guy who gave it to me."
  18. I remember him getting brained against the Browns and then tearing us apart in the AFC Championship game
  19. Here's the thing: I like Greg Roman. His run schemes are really interesting and he can get a lot out of a mobile QB. With our receiving group lacking, I would not be upset at incorporating some of his ideas into our offense. The problem is that this is a passing league. Even run game stalwarts like me acknowledge we are in a pass first league. As a run game coordinator, or someone to bring back designed boots and using a mobile QB like Josh to open the offense back up? Sure. Not as OC
  20. "Can" win? Absolutely. When the Bills offense is clicking no one can stop them whether they want a quick strike or milk the clock. The much maligned defense still finished the season #2 in points allowed. The problem is when the offense inexplicably goes cold. I still like our chances but this is going to be a tight one.
  21. His talent has not been questioned. He's still a douche
×
×
  • Create New...