All Activity

I think different players are motivated by different things I guess I don't find it particularly surprising that a 34yr vet w no prior relationship w the Bills might opt to retire instead of reporting

They just remodeled The Olympic Stadium or thats still in progress in Montreal

That whole podcast he did was just a pr move to make the bills feel like they’re keeping a dude from playing football near his family/put some public pressure on the bills to release him. It doesn’t seem to have worked lol

So is McD. It will be a tough game, but I'm not conceding to those Boston arrogant p#$&@ks.

Bro I have one kidney and owe alot to the medical professionals. I'm not claiming all are bad. I'm saying it could happen again and covid did not help the public" trust the science".

Mark Kelso famously wore a padded helmet during the Super Bowl Years. He was prone to concussions and the medical staff gave him a choice padded helmet or stop playing.

There isn't a Canadian city with an adequate stadium Vancouver, maybe.

I meant just on wide receivers. Shavers and Shakir were nice late-round picks, but otherwise Beane is passing or whiffing on WR picks, hence my metaphor of the picky batter passing up not just players that fell to him, like Metcalf, Adams, Pickens, Nacua, and McConkey, but also not trading up for players within reach. I realize you need a trading partner, but every year since he drafted Allen, I've wanted Beane to trade up for a receiver who can help him. For example, I was dying that he sat pat in 2023 when teams picked Smith-Njigba, Zay Flowers, and Jordan Addison. He traded up for Kincaid instead, which has worked out ok, but the WR was a problem then and is getting to be a bigger problem every year. I'm not saying anything new. I just hope Beane a) prioritizes wide receiver next year; and b) figures out why he has repeatedly missed on the position.

Theres a bunch of good 4pm window games and I think the cowboys are still a pretty big SNF draw somehow 😂 I think the networks can protect a certain amount of games not sure exactly how it works. If the game goes to SNF or MNF it swaps networks as big as this game feels on paper it really isn’t very high stakes at this moment.. pats will probably still win the division with a loss and bills will probably still make the playoffs with a loss. If this game was for the division lead I bet it woulda been flexed

Obviously, but what a baby. I though players want to play. The Bills are going to the playoffs. Doesn't Slay want a shot at a ring? Apparently he'd rather pout. And what happens if did make it to the Eagles? Would he tell his coaches he doesn't want to go to Buffalo because it's too cold?

It's not. There were some bad docs. More than a few. But the vast majority are not that. Ever get ripped off by a contractor? Lousy real estate agent? Bad lawyer? Botched police investigation? Deceitful big box salesman? Of course something bad can happen, and happen more than once. But it's not a reason to dispose of baby and bathwater.

Maybe he just doesn't want to play here Either way what's the big deal

For QBs as cerebral and experienced as Rivers it’s like riding a bike. He will need to knock off some rust for sure, but he will not see anything from a defense that he hasn’t seen countless times before.

5 catches in ROOKIE year. He’s 5th WR on a pretty stacked WR room. Diggs-Boutte-Hollins—Douglas-Chism. A stacked TE room with Henry and Hooper. Kyle Williams is making plays when his number is called. They have been trying to get him more involved. He’s been making highlight catches, and impressing on kick returns. https://www.si.com/nfl/patriots/onsi/news/new-england-patriots-kyle-williams-turning-heads-new-kick-returner I know how you need to get the last word in A.D. and love to say no, I’m right, you are wrong. Kyle Williams not good blah blah whatever. Don’t you think Kyle Williams would improve the Bills? 4.4 speed is one major skillset the Bills is missing. The Texans played press the whole game. We could use him as a returner. Don’t you agree Kyle Williams would of been a much, much better draft pick then Landon Jackson? and I’m jealous of the Pats WR room. Forget Diggs, give Josh Boutte, Williams, Hollins, Douglas- Josh passing numbers would skyrocket I don’t think we need WR room loaded with a superstars. Just WRs who can open (and catch).

Seeing they already played a SNF game, they can’t do 2

Guardian caps I think they're called. They're still in use this season around the league although other than Rapp I don't recall too many Bills ever wearing them. Taron Johnson for a game or 2 last season maybe, if memory serves me correctly. My son and I were shouting at the TV last week urging Tee Higgins to put one on!

10 fumbles in 94 career NFL games. Is that a lot?

How are they fading when they won 10 in a row

Brain pillows…

We are unlikely to catch the Pats for the division crown, but let's not let them clinch it against us.

The season is almost done. It would take longer for the family to move than to just play out the season. That's why I think this excuse is BS. The family is already in Philly, not in Pittsburgh. Slay can get a nice suite at a Buffalo hotel, or bunk with a teammate, and play out the string with the Bills, then go home in 5-6 weeks, 8 if we go all the way.

Could we at least just be blessed with a Lombardi?

Its not necessarily bad science, but simply science that is limited by its design. Design was observational study. Whenever you read about any study, in any medical journal, think about the design. For instance, lets say that your hypothesis is that snow shoveling causes fatal heart attacks. Here are 4 study designs, in order of weakest to strongest. 1) Case report. a doc publishes a report that some dude was shoveling snow, had a hear attack, and died. No controls. 2) Case series. A doc publishes that he saw 10 patients in the ER over the last 3 years who were shoveling snow when they developed a heart attack. No controls. 3) Case control. A doc studies hear attack patients who are in the hospital, and asks them when they last shoveled snow. The shovers are the cases, non shovelers are the controls. 4) Cohort study. Men choose either to be shovlers, or hire a neighbor kid, and never touch a shovel. You then follow these men for months to years, and see if the shovelers have more heart attacks. Advantage is this is now prospective, with controls. Disadvantage is that men choose which group they are in. Maybe younger healthier guys are mostly shovelers, and older sickly guys choose to be non-shovelers. 5) Randomized experiment. Men are randomly placed into groups where they either shovel or dont. Conceptually, this is the best experimental design. Obviously, this type of design is often unethical or not feasible for other reasons. And these are often very costly studies. The best designs for vaccines are this type of design, where one group gets the vaccine, the other group gets a placebo, and the groups are chosen randomly. This was the design for the landmark mRNA vaccines, involving ~ 30K volunteers, and published in the NEJM. The linked study above is an observational study. This is a type of case control, suboptimal as the numbers of cases and controls are far different. These are generally considered weak evidence in the medical community, and usually more of a hypothesis generating study, as opposed to a definitive study.