All Activity
- Past hour
-
No. You're thinking of kinetic energy, not force.
-
Waddle also plays in an offense that will pass the ball. Didnt Diggs start wanting out because the Vikings became more run heavy? I don’t think Diggs, pre-trade, is head and shoulders above Waddle.. different players.. but Waddle is also in an Offense that has a competent downfield passing attack.
-
i think the opposite tbh waddle's miami production>diggs minnesota production
-
Way to out yourself, Coach. We get it. You don’t like Brandon Beane.
-
I feel like we are gonna pound the Pats. I can't wait for this game. We have turned the corner (no pun) and they boys are playing dawg football! Shaq has been hitting hard and literally plowing RB's backwards for a few weeks. Bosa will be amped! Our O line is back and ready for the run (no pun). Josh is Josh, again. Cook is gonna cook and Cooks is a secret still. And here comes Kincaid and Knox who have amped this O at the right time. Spencer Brown said "I hate the Puts.. gonna grind all day for fun". Love that quote! The boys are amped and I truly can't wait for this game. I expect a pounding W from the Bills: Bills - 38 Puts - 16
-
The "big deal" about this is that we lost Ingram for no reason because of it.
-
True, but in retrospect I’m glad we played them at full O strength. Needed to see we can keep up with a team like that, and while their defense is trash, that offense in the form we saw, might be the best in the NFL … might not even be close.
-
Anie Agar counting down the 2026 draft order." Or is that the Patriots schedule ".
-
Waddle is not toxic. And is much more explosive. At any rate, if Diggs is the best WR in Beanes tenure, who do you think is second best? Shakir? Gabe? Brown? Very sad. And if you don’t think Waddle is a #1- have the Bills had a #1 WR not named Diggs in Beanes 9 years?
-
Diggs was maybe a notch or two above what Waddle is thought of before the trade to Buffalo. We’ll never know what Waddle could’ve turned into with Allen. But I’d agree that Diggs had more of a complete skillset. Big play ability along with elite route running. Waddle is more explosive than Diggs ever was but isn’t as polished of a bucket getter.
-
Darius Slay claimed on waivers by Buffalo
Einstein's Dog replied to TD716's topic in The Stadium Wall
If he didn't want to play he could have just retired. But no, he thought he could get the same amount of money playing in a place where he preferred to go. And Rosenhaus arranged it. When it didn't go as planned, Slay quit. Pretty cut and dry tampering if you ask me. Hell, people here were upset Beane didn't go and talk to find out if Slay would play here - which is not the way this is supposed to work. Do you think it would be alright if Cincy now waived Flacco because they had assurances that the Chargers would pick up his contract? -
Imo waddle would have had a good chance to put up diggs #s in that offense, maybe more Waddle is much more of a threat after the catch, better speed too
-
SNOWFLAKE ALERT: Facts trigger full MAGA meltdown
AlBUNDY4TDS replied to Homelander's topic in Politics, Polls, and Pundits
Almost funny, I'm real as you are tds infested. Why don't you respond directly to me, coward? -
LMAO - He is not near Diggs prime level, geezus thats so over the top. Diggs was a legit top 3 WR for his first few years here. Waddle is a WR2 not even a WR1. He would have been by the best WR on this team no doubt right now, and he would have helped this group. BUT this is just over the top to claim he is better than Diggs was. Literally no one in the NFL would say that either. And his value is not as high as Diggs was either.
-
That was true a few years ago but the frequency has decreased. I think the league has found a better balance of safety and going overboard honestly. The amount of ticky tack calls are less than they were. And yea defensive players can adjust. https://www.nflpenalties.com/penalty/roughing-the-passer?view=season
-
SNOWFLAKE ALERT: Facts trigger full MAGA meltdown
Homelander replied to Homelander's topic in Politics, Polls, and Pundits
@BillsFanNC's VPN is active today. -
Elon Musk appreciation thread
Homelander replied to Big Blitz's topic in Politics, Polls, and Pundits
There is a reason why Elon doesn't want you to see this tweet. https://x.com/greendragonhq/status/1999567232289099928?s=20 The link could not be embedded because x.com does not allow embedding of that tweet. -
I see it as Shakir, Palmer, Shavers back on the team for next year. That leaves 3 spots open. I am all in on double dipping on WR in the draft so there's 2 more spots. Last spot is a fight between Coleman and another potential vet getting added to the battle. I was actually thinking of starting a to early mock draft thread but didn't. I actually am not that high on Lemon but I'm still just digging into wrs. I'd give the early nod to Bell and Boston or potentially even Brazzell. Brazzell could be somebody that rises up if he has a great combine. I like Singleton, Antonio Williams, or a flyer on Nyck Harbor later on. Also, if a guy like Germie Bernard is there in the second it would be hard to pass up. Would love to have something like Bell in round 1 and Bernard in round 2.
-
Darius Slay claimed on waivers by Buffalo
dollars 2 donuts replied to TD716's topic in The Stadium Wall
Respectfully, WEO, (and I am not trying to be a jerk, standoffish or play with words) because the receivers are close to the same doesn't mean it, or they, are the same as they were last year. As I stated earlier, but more specifically now, as Josh sits entrenched in 2 years of Brady I think he goes through things differently, or locks in to a certain way of thinking, when he is back there which wasn't necessarily the case earlier in his career. I also think the same receivers are a little different, as are the way defenses play against them Full well I 100% admit I have NOTHING to back this up. It is just the smell test associated with it. We can analyze numbers, which we do all the time. However, it is harder to analyze people. I do put some of this on Josh, whose pluses absolutely dwarf the issue. However, that doesn't mean it is not going on. -
You act as though you are impartial in the tweet sharing you do here while whining about others reinforcing their “priors”. Just two days ago you were excitedly posting tweets from some lady in Utah…right up until she tweeted about not having all relevant information. It’s laughable. As is your punctuation above.
-
That’s questionable
