All Activity

Here's your answer, sunshine...

I don't think the Kim situation, as terrible as it is, is materially distracting his ability to manage the Bills and/or Sabres. And the Sabres were a disaster prior to Kim getting ill. she seems to care more about winning than Terry.

Sean would have benched Thurman to make it harder on Kelly just like he did last night to Allen by benching Cook.

Beane and McDermott have Allen's entire career here. If either one goes it's Beane and that is unlikely

The opposite of love isn't hate, it's apathy. Maybe they just dont care enough to be upset anymore since they know it wont change... (I know I'm being a bit emo/dramatic here, but...)

I think there can be many answers to this question. 1- it's still entertainment 2- Hope 3- who wants to think that they've wasted all their fan life just to not see them win? An artificial win is still a win much like the WWE. 4- sometime you believe something is happening and yet not want to believe it.

Truer words on this site have never been written ... "Veritas non nocet; ignorantia est" - Marcus Aurelius

I think I remember a Bills player slipping on a mat and missed the game

I really hate dumb, biased polls like this so almost never participate when I come across one--so loaded in their language, with no good options for many/most posters. Here? The only option for keeping McDermott is a flat out diumb response, that clearly shows the OPs bias: "He turned the team around and deserves more time." As if THAT is a common form of reasoning, and the main one!!, for those wanting to keep McDermott! Flat out ridiculous and over the top comical bias. As, per this poll, THAT reason would be the only, or main reason, folks who think McDermott should be the head coach, use to justify his continued tenure here. And what an awful reason, eight years into his tenure, presented in this dumb poll as the sole reason many would want to keep him. 100% nonsense. It completely invalidates the poll results, as THAT is not a reason almost any Bills' fans have for sticking with McDermott--so why on earth would they choose that?? Or participate in this mega biased poil, soley designed to get as many 'fire him' responses as possible--and as few 'keep him' responses as possible. Create a valid poll, one that makes sense and is reasonable, please. Don't wasted people's time.

Well, Kenneth Davis would be on the field every 3rd down and Thurman would be watching during the final drive of the Giants SB

I have heard that. The roster has turned over some and by most account McDermott has softened some. If the players loved him though things like the Taliban comments wouldn’t have leaked. I haven’t heard anything recently but I’m not hearing as much on anything at the moment.

I appreciate the list because I hate the weak rebuttal of "Well WHO can you GUARANTEE will come in and win as head coach?!?" That isnt the winning argument folks think it is. Over 90% of this board had no idea who Sean McDermott was in January 2017. The bummer is, it's a sad list compared to what has been out there the last few years (Vrabel, Harbaugh, Payton, specifically).

Edmunds was a better player overall then Bernard but wanted more money which he cashed in on and we wouldn't pay. Bernard was a good value signing with upside for what they wanted but he is a little lesser then Edmunds. From what I have read in Chicago he has been fine but people do think he is too expensive there and I won't be surprised if he gets cut in a year or two for cap reasons.

That's literally what happened.

If we miss the palyoffs, then all bets are off and he should be fired. However, if I'm Beane/Pegula I'm telling him he needs to fire the coordinators and hire from outside his coaching tree. There needs to be a new perspective in the room.

It was from bitter players and coaches that got fired and let go. Yeah, let's believe that. The players specifically said to him after beating the Chiefs to go on that run "we got your back coach" after the Tyler Dunne hit piece. I know you hate McDermott and want him gone but this is nonsense. If you lost the locker room, you quit on the team, plain and simple. The players have never quit. You don't get rid of you coach by continually winning games lol

I will never understand why they didn't run Thurman more. He was dominant that day. At the very least the Giants would have been forced to put more men in the box to stop him and that would have helped Kelly open up the passing game.

Cuz Marv didn't call the offense, Kelly did.

Is there some kind of problem with Allen dumping off to Cook and making a guy miss for a big gain?

What does starting a poll have to do with being right? I get it, you want some gotcha moment here but it just isn't Be honest... Outside of 4 minutes at the end of the ravens game, how good have they looked? I would say they look terrible and just eeked out wins against bad teams. You honestly think at the eye test this team looks like a super bowl contender this year?

We'd have to ban Gruden from having email. Keon has big lips.

Then you’d probably remember all the playoffs scripts that went along with it.

no he didn't immediately. dennison liked Peterman. dennison got laughed out of the league. mcd put him back in the game after half to have him throw a pick immediately. he didn't go immediately back to taylor revisionist history to go so far on all of this. taylor was playing poorly but to think Peterman gave us any other better shot is terrible coaching and evaluation not just on dennison but on McD.

Letting Edmunds walk was the right choice. Especially at his 4/$72M number. Bernard is a much more instinctual player than Edmunds will ever be. He just doesnt have the size to go with it. But at 4/$50M its a little easier to swallow. The good news is, we can get out of the Bernard contract pretty easily after 2026. And he isnt costing us a ton in the meantime. Still less than we're paying Samuel to be a healthy scratch.

Ha! I'd be happy if they even got to a Superbowl. Or even past the Chefs for that matter.