All Activity

Better yet, a few years in and he’ll be looking for diversions with plausible deniability like studying film…

Well for it not to be a rankings list, everything matters and I did mention that in all my previous posts about that stuff. To be fair, didn't see the "same salary" caveat in the OP, but that kind of makes this exercise a waste of time. He didn't say ignore age or other things though, just salary. But you can't discuss where someone will go in a draft as a "different" topic than just another rankings list if you remove all the things that would make it different than a rankings list. So, still sticking to it being a draft, I still stand by he would be one of the first 30 taken even if you remove the one caveat of salary because age, personality, chemistry, intangibles, etc were not removed and would still all be in play on discussing where they would get drafted. And that still has him going in the first 30 WR's in my book as well. Again all good

This is our year. We close out The Ralph with an AFC Championship win against KC in epic, storm the field fashion. Then beat TB in the Superbowl. Yes, Biff gave me the sports almanac.

Depends how you measure, skill set; higher than his statistics show statistics; we all know the answers

30 to 45, off the top of my head.

Thought the same thing...

Big deal. Somebody sued somebody else. I think the drawing is not really a big deal, either, viewed in isolation. It is, however, another piece of evidence that maybe, just maybe, Trump was knee deep in it with Epstein. The only way to answer this, of course, is to honor the promise to release the files. You know, the stuff Pam held up in front of the cameras. The binder didn't say "grand jury minutes," which almost certainly don't implicate Trump because the testimony would have consider the issue of Epstein's misdeeds. So just release the binder and let the court of public opinion draw its own conclusion.

FWIW, Kirby did specifically say “same salary.” I took the “WR draft” angle as 32 teams with zero WRs and not factoring in dynasty/age. Which basically to me is “who are the most valuable WRs to GMs in 2025, ignoring age/price point.” If you are taking age and price point into account, I think I agree lol.

Still running around doxxing ICE agents Ned?

Trump suing someone? Between 1973 and 2016, he’s been involved in over 4,000 lawsuits on one side or the other. That’s not surprising on its own given his career, vomit personality, and business dealings. But when someone averages a lawsuit every 4th day, for some reason him suing the WSJ doesn’t swing the pendulum one way or the other for me.

LIVES are at risk!! Keep Colbert!

The Senate Judiciary Committee has sent a letter to Attorney General Pam Bondi ordering her to answer questions related to the federal investigation into Jeffrey Epstein, including a claim that FBI personnel were instructed to “flag” any records found that mentioned Trump. “My office was told that these personnel were instructed to ‘flag’ any records in which President Trump was mentioned,” wrote Ranking Member Sen. Dick Durbin (D-Ill.) in the letter dated Friday. “What happened to the records mentioning President Trump once they were flagged?” Durbin also asks Bondi to explain her claim back in February that she had Epstein’s client list “sitting on my desk right now to review.” The FBI and DOJ, in a memo released last week, said such a list doesn’t exist. “If it was not a client list, what was ‘sitting on your desk’ at that moment?” the letter asks. Surveillance footage taken outside of Epstein’s jail cell and released by the FBI and DOJ was also questioned, due to it having been labeled as “full raw” video. A review by Wired magazine concluded that the footage was likely modified, which Durbin said has “needlessly increased” public skepticism of the government’s transparency. The committee requests answers to these, and other questions seen here, by Aug. 1. ######ed is the maga lifestyle Hey did you find Obama’s birth certificate yet?

To be clear, I said several posts back 1 more target per game. Not sure who is talking 50 more targets, that is WR1 territory and I have not seen anyone suggest that and certainly not me. And again, at 100 targets there is already a mix of route types, to assume to add 17 more targets over a season means it has to predominantly come from one route type is not a logical way to estimate or predict outcomes. There is no way around that no matter how much you want to insist it seems to only be possible via bubble screens. Literally everyone expected a drop across the board in efficiency on double the volume, including me. I am not even factoring in his 2023, like 0 factor even though those are real stats he did achieve, I have given him 0 value for them despite him achieving them when in reality some sort of blended between the two is more than warranted. I am still removing them entirely. I think you have lost a bit of what this Topic started as - The OP poised this a DRAFT (in caps to emphasize, not yell as all is good) - and not a 1 year FFL draft, but an NFL draft to build a roster. In a draft, age, fit, style, tangibles, etc all get weighed. Tyreek Hill is on the final year or two of his career...Shakir is in his prime. A team drafting to build a roster isn't going to draft $30M WR at age 31 (who is also a bad teammate and overall POS - yes things that will be considered in a draft) over a young Shakir still ascending in his prime making $15M per and with his long list of intangibles (dirty work, great hands, clutch, playmaker with ball in his hands, good and willing blocker, etc). Its just not gonna happen, at least it shouldn't. This is NOT a rankings list (again highlighting not yelling), this is where do they go in an NFL draft if the league redrafted today. The reality is there are a lot of TE's that would go ahead of a lot of the WR's in the 20's and 30's too, but this was only about Shakir and how many WR's go before him in a draft. And that is a large disconnect I think in our views of both Shakir and the other WR's. I am staying true to the task of the OP and treating this as a GM would who is going to factor all the intangibles, roster makeup, draft strategy, costs, age etc. Otherwise we can kill this thread and everyone can move back to the rankings thread. Again, you are ranking not drafting see above. Not only are you trying to rank instead of the draft task of this thread, but I also don't agree with your limited view on him. People said this to me when he was a 5th round pick - they said this to me before he broke out - they keep trying to say this to me after he broke out. Shakir keeps proving to be more than that, and I don't personally think he has fully peaked yet either. But its all good, all individual perspective and all just a make believe draft anyway. Cheers

Yes If need be Hailee is well equipped to speed up the process...

That’s a lot of money for a guy with ONE career playoff sack in four games

So she’s ok w pedophilia though. tulsi is a tool. Deep state. 🤣

EXACTLY!

Serious question: Do you think an answer from Grok which gets it's information from Twitter and the internet proves anything?

Yes, and when he has kids we will win 4 in a row and finally align the universe.

And as pointed about above it is how many reach the end of their rookie deal, not how many sign a second deal. So agree Cook should could and it is 3/6. I didn't say it was bad. I know it is better than average.

Whether the story is real or fake, saying the em dash is new is borderline r.etarded.

A married Josh is going to be a more well rested and ok, let's get down to business Josh Allen. I do Billieve this will be a special year in Allens life, and we're just getting started...