All Activity
- Past hour
-
-
The private lot folks are getting too greedy. $40-$50 to park a mile from the stadium?
-
The last sjf training camp of 2025 8/7
The Firebaugh Kid replied to scuba guy's topic in The Stadium Wall
I understand the health concerns, but Samuel had big tds in both playoff games last year. -
No team is going to take that contract. Even the greats fumble on occasion and I think Beane fumbled here
-
-
Nothing like unbounded optimism. I am old enough to remember when Obama ushered in a new Democratic century. Well, not true. But there is a troubling issue with income/wealth distribution in America. It far predates Trump (even Trump 1.0). What you guys would call "globalism" is really nothing more than "a free economy." Bernie would say it's a Winner Take All economy. Tyler Cowen called it "Average is Over." A good read.
-
I like that with the one caveat those that are trying to make the team ipeven in a backup role are going to give everything they can. As far as dinner, Pre season doesn’t matter to me. I only casually watch a bit, and I believe this week is on national tv, so that’s fine. Often, they don’t air in Tampa the Bills preseason games.
-
I agree with your point on this being Cook's one big bite of the apple. However, I don't just do what anyone tells me to do. I own my actions. I consider input, advice, and knowledge. However, when it comes time to take action, that decision and action is mine.
-
Trump’s glorious Golden Age of America is here
Wolfgang replied to Homelander's topic in Politics, Polls, and Pundits
-
That's a really generalized statement. I'm always on the player's side for the 31 other teams.
-
8/6 Camp Report (Astro’s Counterpart)
2003Contenders replied to Jerry Jabber's topic in The Stadium Wall
Those negative tweets about Moore all appear to be coming from a single "source" whom I have never heard of named Mike Ross. Not sure if he is viewing things from a different perspective or if he is a troll. -
But that's the thing you're not getting - it's not a negative distraction. Like DrDawkenstein said, he's in the meetings, he is watching film, he's talking with his running backs coach, he's just not practicing. Just like the fans are always on the owners side, the players are always on the players side.
-
FEMA cuts, MAGA cries: the hypocrisy hits home
Homelander replied to Homelander's topic in Politics, Polls, and Pundits
-
Smelling Salts NOT Banned by NFL - (updated scents!)
machine gun kelly replied to boyst's topic in The Stadium Wall
Now that’s funny. You took a lot of tie. For all these replies bud. I always enjoy your posts friend. Enjoy the day. -
They all understand the business. They all are in the same boat and support each other getting as much money as each of them can. It's the players vs the owners in a good union. Not the workers against each other.
-
You’re missing the forest for the trees. Over 75 percent of the country can’t afford anything. You clowns shut down the planet pumped 12 trillion into the economy and played dumb about the looming inflation that was going to cause. Significantly so. Unprecedented global response to the economy over the flu and again - you played dumb about what all the ramifications would be. You cheered on the “33 million lost jobs” bc of Covid. You harped on Trump stating Covid wouldn’t get here (I guess he should have just said we’re under attack bc lunatics in charge of the world fear me). Then pretended the fallout from it all was bc Putin and worse, acted all obtuse over what was happening - all while going completely insane on wokism. No easy fix to this. But Trump is doing it. Unprecedented attack on the economy - broke it - time to fix EVERYTHING. So I don’t know what the hell you’re even talking about here regarding this data. Seems like more deliberate obfuscation. All you idiots had to do in 2020 was nothing. Most likely bc logic says so, a Democrat probably wins in 2024. Trump would have won in 2020 but with a divided Congress his whole 2nd term. But nope. And now you’re staring at a Vance/Rubio presidency in 2028 to 2032 and probably 2 more SCOTUS appointments.
-
I think you're mixing up two things. Apportionment - the number of representatives each state has - is different from districting. And this difference is what Republicans today are trying to exploit. As for the "enumeration" clause - yes, it does clearly contemplate once in ten years. And apportionment is based on that. Even the Republicans today aren't arguing that (for example, saying that net out migration from California should result in that state losing a rep or two before the next census)