All Activity

Well since it is illegal to enter this country without going to the immigration process, that means have committed a federal crime. That is a federal criminal offense. It's why they are called "illegal immigrants." Just because you want to call them "undocumented" doesn't mean they are legal. 100% of illegal immigrants have committed a federal crime. That is factual. No, I didn't say they are all violent criminals. There are are approximately just under 14 million illegals in this country. If .1% is a violent criminal, that still means 14,000 are walking the streets. We have a crime problem in the US, why add more criminals? But you're okay with that as long as it doesn't affect you and your family. It's okay if someone else's daughter gets raped, someone else's family is murdered, someone else's son if violently attacked and robbed. You are a globalist only when you don't have to deal with the bad consequences.

yea I heard on wgr that the bills have not beat the saints in buffalo since 1983. Means nothing but it is interesting.

You have to understand that from where he is standing, Obama is a conservative. You have to understand that from where he is standing, Obama is a conservative.

Fun fact – a couple years later he claimed that he had not seen hundreds of cases like this.

Did Trump win the 2020 election?

every illegal imigrant is a criminal

There is a thread with the exact same title and the exact same content started by you a minute before this one... couldn't you use the search function?

They would have a discussion with him, I'm sure. But I don't think they ever offered Tremaine an actual deal. They talked, but they were far enough apart that there was never a deal on the table.

That's not nuts, that's Drew Brees...

I've never liked The Athletic. Fire McD and Beane and bring in someone who knows how to win a SuperBowl! Accountability for Elam. Cody Ford something something. Whyd we trade Teller???

Torrence is on contract through the 2026 season. Have the Bills ever declined to negotiate a new contract at all (meaning not even a low ball) with a high draft pick who was playing well? The politics of that seems counter to their "resign your own" philosophy. Could they actually tell a player, "we like you a lot but we'd rather spend the money elsewhere?" I know it makes sense, but is it a bad look to the player and the team? What I mean is, even paying him under market value could still be too much so could they just say, we can't afford you at all, as opposed to offering 80% of market value, which would still be too much?

Pregnant women having a fever can hurt the fetus so Tylenol is good to take

Which is exactly why my priority is to get them as many losses as possible as soon as possible.

https://x.com/DGrayTexas45/status/1970615810931728422?t=n76KnKZui0p-m6vj3H8qIw&s=19 Link above shows multiple news reports dating back to 2014 of published research linking acetaminophen use during pregnancy and ADHD/autism. X doesn't allow embedding... Again Elon, you still have the enemy within.

I can see this being an expansion for the most populous ans wealthy cities in Canada. I seriously doubt any merger. I have no problem with a 4 team expansion into Canada as they are so close to the US. A lot easier than Europe expansion, but see that as well. Can’t you see a four Canada expansion, and a four European expansion into say GB, Germany as they love the NFL, and maybe Spain. More money for the NFL, And they are global business trying to expand. From a business sense it makes a lot of sense. I don’t think about what we had 30 years ago, mor what is likely.

I think if there was any danger of a letdown then this would be the game. The Bills are coming two wins in 4 days over divisional rivals. They have another divisional rivalry game next week. This is a game against a "Meh" non-conference opponent that the Bills have no history with. I think the Bills will still win as the talent gap between these teams is huge but if there was ever a game for them to let their guard down then this is it.

Ask the assh*le that started the thread “Los Angeles under military attack”. It’s the same person that wanted people to believe that he went to school with Susan Collins.

Sick at home today. In the stereo system:

Oh no! The skeptical narrative takes a hit!

This is not about one particular issue. It's about absolutes. Are there any? Does logic exist? Does truth exist? Is it important? We all use logical fallacies in our arguments, some more than others. But would it be preferable to avoid them or not purposefully use them at all? I think there are absolutes and that logic exists and is vital towards the search for truth which we all should want. https://academicinfluence.com/inflection/study-guides/logical-fallacies#tu-quoque A common fallacy deployed here lately has been "everyone does it so it's ok for he/me to do it". I think this is a variation on #7 in the above link. Ad hominems, appeals to authority, straw men and non sequiturs are in abundance here as well, from both sides.. Would it make for better debate if we tried to avoid these? Or is that unrealistic or simply wrong?

Im very curious why you assume every single migrant is a “criminal” or “terrorist” instead of having some nuance

Saints will try to test the Bills run defense. Make Spencer beat you with his arm

Plus, McDermott was so unhappy with how his defense played against the Dolphins, I can't see them being complacent against the Saints. I'm more concerned that an easy win will cause them to let their guard down the following week against the hungry Patriots, who played us hard in both games last year. One-score victories in both. I still haven't gotten over them beating the Bills two years ago in another October game.