Willis990 Posted February 19, 2009 Share Posted February 19, 2009 For a 3rd this year and a 1st next year. Menthion of Wilson really liking him Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SKOOBY Posted February 19, 2009 Share Posted February 19, 2009 System QB they say, hmmmmm..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RayFinkle Posted February 19, 2009 Share Posted February 19, 2009 System QB they say, hmmmmm..... SKOOB, how did your inside sources not give you the heads up? Make some calls and let us know if this is legit. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ned Flanders Posted February 19, 2009 Share Posted February 19, 2009 For a 3rd this year and a 1st next year. Menthion of Wilson really liking him Isn't this close to what we gave the Pats for Drew? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tcali Posted February 19, 2009 Share Posted February 19, 2009 Isn't this close to what we gave the Pats for Drew? cough....LOL.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ricojes Posted February 19, 2009 Share Posted February 19, 2009 Isn't this close to what we gave the Pats for Drew? Ok, coffee on my keyboard after reading that comment. the worse part is, it's pretty much what we did give up... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The_Real Posted February 19, 2009 Share Posted February 19, 2009 Please god, no.... Dare I say.. DOOOMED?!?! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alphadawg7 Posted February 19, 2009 Share Posted February 19, 2009 I posted on here a few weeks ago that I had been told by a reliable source close to the situation that there was believed to be strong Buffalo interest in Cassel...so, that would make 2 sets of inside sources speculating on the same thing about Cassel. Interestingly though, I just got ripped for my source through most the thread rather than actually discuss the possibility of Buffalos interest...either way, the conversation I had did happen and just makes me wonder more about this thread... Â That old phrase comes to mind..."Where theres smoke, theres fire"... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alphadawg7 Posted February 19, 2009 Share Posted February 19, 2009 On a seperate note...directed at pats... Â Am I the only one who sits in aww about how the Pats frequently seem to compile extra first round and first day draft picks, despite being a top team almost ever year? Rather they trade Cassel to us or someone else, they will once again land more additional first day picks... Â Seems they alway find a way to put something like this together...no wonder they are a top team every year... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
damj Posted February 19, 2009 Share Posted February 19, 2009 Ugh! Please say it ain't so Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MattyT Posted February 19, 2009 Share Posted February 19, 2009 I guarantee this is BS (and the OP is a Pats fan). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beerball Posted February 19, 2009 Share Posted February 19, 2009 I posted on here a few weeks ago that I had been told by a reliable source close to the situation that there was believed to be strong Buffalo interest in Cassel...so, that would make 2 sets of inside sources speculating on the same thing about Cassel. Interestingly though, I just got ripped for my source through most the thread rather than actually discuss the possibility of Buffalos interest...either way, the conversation I had did happen and just makes me wonder more about this thread... That old phrase comes to mind..."Where theres smoke, theres fire"... people might take you more seriously if you didn't have a glass stuck between your boobage. Just sayin. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ddaryl Posted February 19, 2009 Share Posted February 19, 2009 If the Bills give the Patriots draft picks for Cassel I will have no choice but to take out the entire Bills FO and I will beat Ralph silly.. Â No way this franchise could be that friggin stupid... Oh wait we have a history of it Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alphadawg7 Posted February 19, 2009 Share Posted February 19, 2009 people might take you more seriously if you didn't have a glass stuck between your boobage. Just sayin. Â Â LMAO Â That photo is actually the logo for one of my fantasy football teams I play in with guys I played college football with... Â My team name is: "Big Ole TD's" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beerball Posted February 19, 2009 Share Posted February 19, 2009 LMAO Â That photo is actually the logo for one of my fantasy football teams I play in with guys I played college ball with... Â Team name is: "Big Ole TD's" I'm not sayin you don't have a nice rack, but it does take away from your message. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nucci Posted February 19, 2009 Share Posted February 19, 2009 people might take you more seriously if you didn't have a glass stuck between your boobage. Just sayin. Actually, I have more respect because of that Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
All_Pro_Bills Posted February 19, 2009 Share Posted February 19, 2009 I guarantee this is BS (and the OP is a Pats fan). Â I'd question the rationale for either party to make such a trade. If the Patriots believe Cassell is a talented and on the rise QB then they'd be hesitant to trade him to team in their division. If on the other hand, they'd entertain such a trade the Bills would be wise to run as fast as they can in the other direction. Recall trading Bledsoe to the Bills was not a problem for Mr. Bill because he felt Drew would be no threat to the Patriots supremacy, even going to a division rival. This proved to be correct. So what's changed since then? What's the saying about history? Those who ignore it are doomed to repeat it, or something like that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beerball Posted February 19, 2009 Share Posted February 19, 2009 I'd question the rationale for either party to make such a trade. If the Patriots believe Cassell is a talented and on the rise QB then they'd be hesitant to trade him to team in their division. If on the other hand, they'd entertain such a trade the Bills would be wise to run as fast as they can in the other direction. Recall trading Bledsoe to the Bills was not a problem for Mr. Bill because he felt Drew would be no threat to the Patriots supremacy, even going to a division rival. This proved to be correct. So what's changed since then? What's the saying about history? Those who ignore it are doomed to repeat it, or something like that. If I'm reading between the lines, you find it more likely that the pats* would trade brady* to the Bills because he's damaged goods & on the downside of his career. I just don't think I could chear for that turd in a Bills uni. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MattyT Posted February 19, 2009 Share Posted February 19, 2009 If I'm reading between the lines, you find it more likely that the pats* would trade brady* to the Bills because he's damaged goods & on the downside of his career. I just don't think I could chear for that turd in a Bills uni. Don't worry your pretty little head over it. NGFH!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PastaJoe Posted February 19, 2009 Share Posted February 19, 2009 How about we let each team keep their QBs and we swap the rest of our rosters and coaches. What good is bringing in another QB when he won't have the players around him to succeed. The Bills problem isn't QB. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts