Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
1 hour ago, muppy said:

well I'll be the first person in this thread to express my Thankfulness this guy is behind bars..

no yu're not the first person to express this. you're hardly the top 20 of 21 people. you're not special.

Yes Im Happy he is caught

 

surprised? SMH

why would be surprised? you're charmin.

my time in PPP is over

promise?

anyone who would assassinate someone is evil full stop

 

you all can bicker over his motives. It changes NOTHING. Charlie Kirk is still dead and this kid just ruined his own and likely his families lives too

it changes a lot and you're not going to like what this does. this is the naive belief of so many that are going to say we need to find middle ground and "peace and love" and the haters gonna hate. it's not binary. every action creates a deliberate and worse action when it comes to politics. there will be more charlie kirk's but they won't be nice. they'll be Milo, Ben, and people we do not know. extremism will be increased since the liberals have been emboldened by this action for their cause and they preach violence. the republicans will take action because they're concerned and violence will meet violence

only a dinder headed ninny muff would belief nothing changes

1 hour ago, muppy said:

 

 

Posted
4 minutes ago, ALLinALLEN said:

My point is that if a crazed anti-abortion person committed a shooting, It would be wrong to say they were "part of the MAGA movement!" Sure its a shared view, but unless you show me that same person at rallies, on online forums, encouraged by others...then I would conclude the person was just a crazy person acting out tat happened to share similar views. I think this kid shared some (or alot even) of Antifa views, but I'm not saying he is part of the Antifa movement. As facts come out, that could surely change.

 

If the MAGA movement specifically states something along the lines of the Italian anti-facist phrase, then no it wouldn't be wrong to say.

Clear motive.  Political rhetorics create rogue militias.  

 

What MAGA resistance rhetoric does that promotes violence? 

 

Bella ciao is specifically a phrase towards Nazi's, created by the Italians in the 1940's as they were fighting the facist Nazi's.  Tyler Robinson called Kirk a facist. 

This seems simple. 

  • Agree 1
Posted
1 hour ago, BillsFanNC said:

 

Right. It never happens. Hey at least you got Jauronimo with you, which is nice.

 

Now do your job and attack the messenger.

 

 

have you asked @Jauronimo if any of his positions have changed? have you asked him if anything in society changed? have you done any followup to something he evidently said 3-4 years ago when drag queen story hours were not prevelent?

56 minutes ago, muppy said:

look at senor tall trying to dictate when  I can post. FAT CHANCE of that lol

 

you don't get to decide stay off my lawn PLEASE PUT ME ON IGNORE

 

YOU can besamme MUCHO dearie. You mean less than  nothing to me, nor your opinion

 

**** off

 

another QUALITY MAGA POSTER showing his mettle  lmao

you're the one saying you're going to leave. trust me. we won't miss you. you're a postulant betty who pollutes the place with self righteous indignity.  

46 minutes ago, Walking Tall said:


You’re angry. Typing fast, misspelling words…awful punctuation.

 

🤣

she's big angry. lol

  • Haha (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, Royale with Cheese said:

 

If the MAGA movement specifically states something along the lines of the Italian anti-facist phrase, then no it wouldn't be wrong to say.

Clear motive.  Political rhetorics create rogue militias.  

 

What MAGA resistance rhetoric does that promotes violence? 

 

Bella ciao is specifically a phrase towards Nazi's, created by the Italians in the 1940's as they were fighting the facist Nazi's.  Tyler Robinson called Kirk a facist. 

This seems simple. 

I think you are missing my point in what I'm saying, but if you believe that he's Antifa then ok, no changing that. It does nothing for me (whether he is or isnt) as the fringe far-left and far-right groups need to quell tensions and their rhetoric.

  • Agree 1
Posted
3 minutes ago, The Frankish Reich said:

And everyone here is comfortable with calling Kamala a communist. 

I was countering the point attempting to limit the crazies to social media

Posted
5 minutes ago, The Frankish Reich said:

And everyone here is comfortable with calling Kamala a communist. 

Do you imagine that to carry the same weight as a presidential candidate on a reliable mainstream media political telecast?  Of course you don’t but you felt the need to draw a parallel anyway. Ridiculous. 

  • Agree 2
Posted
3 minutes ago, ALLinALLEN said:

I think you are missing my point in what I'm saying, but if you believe that he's Antifa then ok, no changing that. It does nothing for me (whether he is or isnt) as the fringe far-left and far-right groups need to quell tensions and their rhetoric.

 

I don't think I'm missing your point, I just don't agree with your point....respectfully.

Whether or not he is "officially" affiliated with Antifa is meaningless to me because the rhetoric is the root cause.

  • Agree 1
Posted
1 minute ago, boyst said:

have you asked @Jauronimo if any of his positions have changed? have you asked him if anything in society changed? have you done any followup to something he evidently said 3-4 years ago when drag queen story hours were not prevelent?

 

Nope. Once someone is on my ignore list it's permanent. I honestly do not care if his position has evolved.

 

I understand if you disagree with that approach, but it's how I choose to exist in the cesspool.

 

And they were very prevelent then, probably moreso than today, but that was in the pre Elon Twitter era where if you drew attention or noticed sexualizing kids it would be taken down or shadow banned on social media.

 

The videos I posted in this thread would be very difficult to find in pre Elon Twitter.

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
Just now, Royale with Cheese said:

 

I don't think I'm missing your point, I just don't agree with your point....respectfully.

Whether or not he is "officially" affiliated with Antifa is meaningless to me because the rhetoric is the root cause.

Ok, agree to disagree...respectfully. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
1 hour ago, Royale with Cheese said:

 

You're being naive on purpose.

We saw the messages on the bullet casings.

Come on man.

 

Just really think about this.  You are upset over a heartfelt tribute....a tribute.  A tribute that is used by Law Enforcement by someone in Law Enforcement and you're not in Law Enforcement..

Something this small is making you angry.  Really think about that.


I don’t think for a second that it’s genuine. Sorry. 

18 minutes ago, boyst said:

3 down V's is 1337 speak brah

 

lurk 4chan lol


Dear god no, I’m already here too much. 

  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted
1 minute ago, Roundybout said:


I don’t think for a second that it’s genuine. Sorry. 

 

 

You are triggered by a tribute.  Think about that.

He knew Charlie Kirk personally.  He was a friend.  You are triggered by a tribute.  Think about that.  You are triggered by a tribute.

You are so triggered that you are reaching to these depths.  He watched a friend of his die in front of his family and you're going to call him disingenuous.  He witnessed an image that was so graphic, watching a man bleed out in front of him, never had a chance...something he will never forget.  And you're triggered by a tribute.  I will never forget it like my older family members remember Kennedy getting assassinated.  And you're triggered by a tribute.

Really think about that.

 

We know how you feel.  We aren't asking for empathy or sympathy but I really think it's incredibly bizarre that you are now taking shots at grieving peoples character to continue your narrative.  Really think about that.

 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
49 minutes ago, sherpa said:

 

It isn't sad. 

You are an idiot who doesn't seem to understand that I am not interested in replying to you statements that are not proven.

I didn't vote for the guy.

I have no responsibility to you to answer any of your claims that have not been proven as fact.

 

Further, I have no "political indoctrination" nor "raw bias."

None whatsoever.

 

You are clearly ignorant of the subject at hand, and trying to change to that to your unproven accusation doesn't interest me.

You didn't vote for Soros either. 

 

Pretty weak response, as always, from you. 

 

Can't even condemn a guy that gives aid and comfort to a child trafficking molester. 

 

Barf! How politically biased some people get, its like brainwashing 

  • Dislike 1
Posted
22 minutes ago, The Frankish Reich said:

And everyone here is comfortable with calling Kamala a communist. 


 

The internet.  Calling Ds what we’ve been calling them for 75 years.  
 

 

Totally same as a propped up presidential candidate, their political leaders, and media surrogates calling Trump and Trump voters nazis and the biggest threat to the Republic.   


24/7/365 for 10 straight years.  

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted

Well Kamala was raised by a Marxist and supports Marxist policies. So there is that.

 

Marxist. Communist. Six of one, half dozen of the other.

 

 

Posted
27 minutes ago, The Frankish Reich said:

And everyone here is comfortable with calling Kamala a communist. 

 

MAGA needs to sit the **** down and admit it - their hero thrives on instigating ***** 24/7.

 

 

Posted
23 minutes ago, ALLinALLEN said:

I think you are missing my point in what I'm saying, but if you believe that he's Antifa then ok, no changing that. It does nothing for me (whether he is or isnt) as the fringe far-left and far-right groups need to quell tensions and their rhetoric.

You're expecting fringe far left groups and fringe far right groups to quell tensions and their rhetoric?  That's like asking Antonio Brown to become a priest.

  • Haha (+1) 2
×
×
  • Create New...