Albwan Posted 13 hours ago Posted 13 hours ago Anything goes for the democrat party in their war vs 47 + America. Many of us saw with our own eyes and are still being gaslighted and persecuted for speaking the truth. 1
SCBills Posted 13 hours ago Posted 13 hours ago Honestly it’s pretty insane that we don’t know who was running the country for 4 years. We had open borders and the leader of the country probably wasn’t even aware this policy was being ushered in under his name. 2
njbuff Posted 13 hours ago Posted 13 hours ago We thought it was bad before hearing these tapes. Now what??
JDHillFan Posted 12 hours ago Posted 12 hours ago The Morning Joe bit comes off as a cartoon. Completely absurd.
njbuff Posted 5 hours ago Posted 5 hours ago Remember, the Dems and the media crucified Hur over this.
All_Pro_Bills Posted 4 hours ago Posted 4 hours ago 9 hours ago, SCBills said: Honestly it’s pretty insane that we don’t know who was running the country for 4 years. We had open borders and the leader of the country probably wasn’t even aware this policy was being ushered in under his name. Like the game of Clue I say it was Obama thru Susan Rice in the White House with the Autopen. 1
BillsFanNC Posted 3 hours ago Posted 3 hours ago (edited) But Fox and right wing media would cover it up just the same for Trump if he was declining. That audio from Trump would be leaked to the media within hours. 😂 Edited 3 hours ago by BillsFanNC
4th&long Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago So now it has been established that he was in rapid decline and that those around him tried to hide it. The question is what to do if this happens again? What are the safeguards? And let's get real with those taking it to far. He was obviously in decline but who was running the country. The same people as always his cabinet. And he was losing it but not like my aunt who is in a home and doesn't recognize her own daughter and is mean to her losing it. He still could make decisions I'm sure. But not someone you want running a country. So what is the protocol?
Doc Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago 15 minutes ago, 4th&long said: So now it has been established that he was in rapid decline and that those around him tried to hide it. The question is what to do if this happens again? What are the safeguards? And let's get real with those taking it to far. He was obviously in decline but who was running the country. The same people as always his cabinet. And he was losing it but not like my aunt who is in a home and doesn't recognize her own daughter and is mean to her losing it. He still could make decisions I'm sure. But not someone you want running a country. So what is the protocol? Step 1 is admitting the truth and step 2 is the 25th Amendment. 1
leh-nerd skin-erd Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago 11 hours ago, Big Blitz said: With respect to the title of your post, I’m not sure his decline was worse than it seemed. He was making up words, struggling to stay on point and had trouble recalling details of his son’s death. This interview seems to follow the trajectory of what we saw the entire time.
leh-nerd skin-erd Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago 33 minutes ago, 4th&long said: So now it has been established that he was in rapid decline and that those around him tried to hide it. The question is what to do if this happens again? What are the safeguards? And let's get real with those taking it to far. He was obviously in decline but who was running the country. The same people as always his cabinet. And he was losing it but not like my aunt who is in a home and doesn't recognize her own daughter and is mean to her losing it. He still could make decisions I'm sure. But not someone you want running a country. So what is the protocol? I think the protocol would be to “get real” much, much sooner than this. One would hope the major media outlets would investigate, using their vaunted inside sources for the greater good, and not shoulder shrug now that they were duped….or that it was someone else’s fault. But, since we cannot trust political operatives to do the right thing, and the media is not trustworthy, we do what we can do—support the agenda that most closely aligns with your values. 1
Andy1 Posted 58 minutes ago Posted 58 minutes ago Clearly he was in mental decline. Reagan also may have had some age decline while President. Same issue with senators on both sides. We will watch time catch up to Trump as he will be older than Biden by the end of his term. We definitely need an age limit to run for office at the Federal level, yet politicians won’t address that issue. Biden and his advisors betrayed the Democratic Party by concealing his decline and trying to run a second time. He said he was going to be a one term bridge, then his ego got too big.
Doc Posted 53 minutes ago Posted 53 minutes ago 5 minutes ago, Andy1 said: Clearly he was in mental decline. Reagan also may have had some age decline while President. Same issue with senators on both sides. We will watch time catch up to Trump as he will be older than Biden by the end of his term. We definitely need an age limit to run for office at the Federal level, yet politicians won’t address that issue. Biden and his advisors betrayed the Democratic Party by concealing his decline and trying to run a second time. He said he was going to be a one term bridge, then his ego got too big. More like they all knew how bad Harris was/would be.
BillsFanNC Posted 32 minutes ago Posted 32 minutes ago What are the safeguards to prevent an empty vessel POTUS again? Oh I don't know maybe holding those who conspired to foist an empty vessel POTUS upon the American people friggin accountable for what they did would be a good start? Nah ..let's just move on!
Recommended Posts