Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I'm curious to see how Moore and Samuel are used in the offense.

 

Palmer, Shakir, Coleman, Samuel and Moore?

Idk about you guys, but that's more talented than last season's Cooper, Shakir, rookie Coleman, Hollins and Samuel.

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Agree 2
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted
12 minutes ago, Kaenon said:

I'm curious to see how Moore and Samuel are used in the offense.

 

Palmer, Shakir, Coleman, Samuel and Moore?

Idk about you guys, but that's more talented than last season's Cooper, Shakir, rookie Coleman, Hollins and Samuel.

 

I think had Cooper not come on mid season and wasn't injured, we'd have been able to do more and probably would have been more talented with him. But given what we got from him, it's hard to argue that Palmer and Moore aren't an upgrade over Cooper and Hollins. We'll still have to see what each brings us though before we can declare that truth.

  • Agree 4
Posted
2 hours ago, 3rdand12 said:

It will be fun to see how much Brady has grown.

Do expect more depth of game calling. Still everyone eats. 

Aint nothing wrong with that 🤠

 

Huge point here. Not necessarily for this topic exactly, but I'm really hopeful Brady comes up with all kinds of counters to and expansions off of last year's tendencies, as well as new stuff. Exciting to watch both sides evolve and discover what they can do well in 2025. 

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Agree 2
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted
48 minutes ago, BillsFanForever19 said:

 

I think had Cooper not come on mid season and wasn't injured, we'd have been able to do more and probably would have been more talented with him. But given what we got from him, it's hard to argue that Palmer and Moore aren't an upgrade over Cooper and Hollins. We'll still have to see what each brings us though before we can declare that truth.

If they don't block they won't play.

  • Agree 1
Posted
49 minutes ago, BillsFanForever19 said:

 

I think had Cooper not come on mid season and wasn't injured, we'd have been able to do more and probably would have been more talented with him. But given what we got from him, it's hard to argue that Palmer and Moore aren't an upgrade over Cooper and Hollins. We'll still have to see what each brings us though before we can declare that truth.

I will remain in the " prove-it " mindset with these two

 Hollins was clutch and made plays.

 Cooper was a ? all along for me

 

 we can see the potential for the two new guys in this offense. 

Wait and see for me  :)

Posted (edited)
10 minutes ago, Richard Noggin said:

 

Huge point here. Not necessarily for this topic exactly, but I'm really hopeful Brady comes up with all kinds of counters to and expansions off of last year's tendencies, as well as new stuff. Exciting to watch both sides evolve and discover what they can do well in 2025. 

It fits here I felt

Can Moore and Palmer help expand Brady's playbook ? Add those wrinkles needed each new season ?

 as for the aside :) Much rides on both Bills Coordinators and advisors this year to get Bills past the " wall" lol

Edited by 3rdand12
  • Like (+1) 1
Posted

With the Palmer and Moore signings we have two receivers who are good separators.  We have two good tight ends and Kincaid is only going to get better.  If Coleman can make contested catches and Samuel becomes a more consistent downfield threat along with Shakir doing his damage out of the slot then we have the ingredients for a very efficient and explosive passing game.  

  • Like (+1) 5
  • Awesome! (+1) 1
Posted
1 hour ago, Kaenon said:

I'm curious to see how Moore and Samuel are used in the offense.

 

Palmer, Shakir, Coleman, Samuel and Moore?

Idk about you guys, but that's more talented than last season's Cooper, Shakir, rookie Coleman, Hollins and Samuel.

Yup. Especially the whispers that have came out about just how bad Coop was

Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, 3rdand12 said:

I will remain in the " prove-it " mindset with these two

 Hollins was clutch and made plays.

 Cooper was a ? all along for me

Hollins made plays but he wasn't exactly a tough matchup for CB's in man coverage.  He was ranked 87th of 99 WR's that qualified in terms of receiving ability according to PFF FWIW.  His blocking will be the most missed part of his game.  Correlation doesn't exactly equal causation but our offense put up 30 plus points in eight straight games when we traded for Cooper.

 

We definitely got faster and Palmer and Moore's skill set (smaller, shiftier, better route runners/separators) is what Allen has thrived with in WR's in the past (Diggs, Brown, Beasley, Shakir, and even McKenzie to some extent).  

 

 

Edited by Doc Brown
  • Like (+1) 3
  • Agree 1
Posted (edited)
54 minutes ago, 3rdand12 said:

It fits here I felt

Can Moore and Palmer help expand Brady's playbook ? Add those wrinkles needed each new season ?

 as for the aside :) Much rides on both Bills Coordinators and advisors this year to get Bills past the " wall" lol

 

Palmer doesn't really expand the playbook as much as they hope executes it better?

 

And Moore is here more for depth and competition rather than for gameplanning around? 

 

Either way I liked your point about Brady's potential growth. SO important whoever is on the final 53.

Edited by Richard Noggin
Posted
29 minutes ago, Doc Brown said:

Hollins made plays but he wasn't exactly a tough matchup for CB's in man coverage.  He was ranked 87th of 99 WR's that qualified in terms of receiving ability according to PFF FWIW.  His blocking will be the most missed part of his game.  Correlation doesn't exactly equal causation but our offense put up 30 plus points in eight straight games when we traded for him.

 

We definitely got faster and Palmer and Moore's skill set (smaller, shiftier, better route runners/separators) is what Allen has thrived with in WR's in the past (Diggs, Brown, Beasley, and even McKenzie to some extent).  

 

With the bolded bit in first paragraph, are you switching from Hollins to Cooper there (trade and offensive run that followed)?

 

Love the point about smaller/better separators being Josh's wheelhouse, and hadn't viewed Palmer through that lens (6'1" 209), but it's fascinating. So much difference between what Beane likes in a WR (size/physicality) and what suits Allen better (speed/separation). In the draft, Beane loves tall WRs and isn't super troubled by middling 40 times.

 

Right at the start of day three I really fell in love with the idea of Jaylin Lane. Or of course Jalen Royals. One of the Jayleins. Someone with explosiveness and shiftiness and speed. But alas. 

  • Like (+1) 2
Posted
1 hour ago, Richard Noggin said:

 

Huge point here. Not necessarily for this topic exactly, but I'm really hopeful Brady comes up with all kinds of counters to and expansions off of last year's tendencies, as well as new stuff. Exciting to watch both sides evolve and discover what they can do well in 2025. 

I'd like him to call a QB sneak off of right guard instead of left for a change.  I kinda think KC knew what was coming on every single sneak during the playoff game. I know I did. 

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Agree 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted
Just now, Richard Noggin said:

 

With the bolded bit in first paragraph, are you switching from Hollins to Cooper there (trade and offensive run that followed)?

 

Love the point about smaller/better separators being Josh's wheelhouse, and hadn't viewed Palmer through that lens (6'1" 209), but it's fascinating. So much difference between what Beane likes in a WR (size/physicality) and what suits Allen better (speed/separation). In the draft, Beane loves tall WRs and isn't super troubled by middling 40 times.

 

Right at the start of day three I really fell in love with the idea of Jaylin Lane. Or of course Jalen Royals. One of the Jayleins. Someone with explosiveness and shiftiness and speed. But alas. 

Yeah.  I forgot to add his name so even I got confused there.  I'll edit it to make me seem less idiotic than usual.  You're right though in the disconnect between the type of WR's Beane drafts compared to the WR's he's had success with (Shakir being the only exception).  Heck, even an older E. Sanders had more success compared to guys like Coleman (so far) and Davis.  

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
1 hour ago, 3rdand12 said:

 

Can Moore and Palmer help expand Brady's playbook ? Add those wrinkles needed each new season ?

 l

This is interesting. It's not so much a question of whether Palmer and Moore fit Brady's offense. I wouldn't call it "expanding" the play book, more like evolving it. 

 

What's happened is they've substituted guys who are, I think, better physically than the guys who left.  It's up to Brady to figure out how his offense must change to create the kind of opportunities that fit the skills of his new players. And yes, it's true every season, for every coordinator, because as the season progresses, defenses figure out how to stop almost everyone. These free agent signings are about getting Brady the best athletes for him to work with. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
4 hours ago, 3rdand12 said:

It will be fun to see how much Brady has grown.

Do expect more depth of game calling. Still everyone eats. 

Aint nothing wrong with that 🤠

 

 

i agree

 

but he cannot be so focused on that  that when a player gets hot in a game it stops him from feeding him the ball, and again and again and again...

 

he did do that last year, but sometimes not

 

see: AFC Championship Game

 

Cook was on fire, not stoppable. Feed him more and then the rest would have opened up more too, as KC would change things to stop him

 

 McD seems to feel the way most of us do about that game, it seems, so that is a good sign--he is a man who does not forget and learns from the past

 

 

Posted
2 hours ago, Kaenon said:

I'm curious to see how Moore and Samuel are used in the offense.

 

Palmer, Shakir, Coleman, Samuel and Moore?

Idk about you guys, but that's more talented than last season's Cooper, Shakir, rookie Coleman, Hollins and Samuel.

Moore and Samuel aren’t the same player. Moore can stretch the field and actually run routes, Samuel will stick to his RAC game of being a gadget guy 

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...